Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  x

☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x
Definitive Proxy Statement
¨
Definitive Additional Materials
¨
Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

xNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(3) Filing Party:
 
(4) Date Filed
 

Date Filed:


LOGO





2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Date and Time

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

Place

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

521 West 57th

533 W. 57th Street,

9th Floor

New York, NYNew York 10019

NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
March 17, 2016
Dear Shareholder:
It is my pleasure to invite you to attend International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2016 Annual Meeting”). The meeting will be held on Monday, May 2, 2016, at 3 p.m. local time / 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, at our offices at 61 rue de Villiers, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. At the meeting, you will be asked to:
1.

Items to be Voted On

LOGO    Elect eleven members of the Board of Directors for aone-year term expiring at the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

2.

LOGO    Ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20162018 fiscal year.

3.

LOGO    Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers in 2015.

4.2017.

LOGO    Transact such other business as may properly come before the 20162018 Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the 20162018 Annual Meeting.

Record Date

Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 8, 2016 may vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting. A live audio webcast of our 2016 Annual Meeting will be available on our website, www.iff.com, starting at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time and a replay will also be available on our website.

It is important that your shares be represented at the 2016 Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares you may hold. Whether or not you plan to attend, please vote using the Internet, by telephone or by mail, in each case by following the instructions in our proxy statement. Doing so will not prevent you from voting your shares in person if you are present.
I look forward to seeing you on May 2, 2016.
Sincerely,
Andreas Fibig
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
We mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and our 2015 Annual Report on or about March 17, 2016.
Our proxy statement and our 2015 Annual Report are available online at www.proxyvote.com.
Except as stated otherwise, information on our website is not part of this proxy statement.





PROXY SUMMARY
This proxy summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement and does not contain all information that you should review and consider. Please read the entire proxy statement with care before voting.
ANNUAL MEETING
Date and Time:
Monday, May 2, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. local time / 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time
Place:
61 rue de Villiers, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
Record Date:
March 8, 2016
Voting:
Each share of our common stock outstanding at the close of business on March 8, 2016 has one vote on each matter that is properly submitted for a7, 2018 may vote at the 20162018 Annual Meeting.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Andreas Fibig

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

March 19, 2018

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATION

Live Audio Webcast

A live audio webcast of our 2018 Annual Meeting will be available on our website,www.iff.com, starting at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time and a replay will also be available on our website.

Proxy Voting

It is important that your shares be represented at the 2018 Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares you may hold. Whether or not you plan to attend, please vote using the Internet, by telephone or by mail, in each case by following the instructions in our proxy statement. Doing so will not prevent you from voting your shares in person if you are present.

Advance Voting Methods

LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 2, 2018:

Our Notice, Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

We are making the Proxy Statement and the form of proxy first available on or about March 19, 2018.

  
LOGO  


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

LOGOWe provide below highlights of certain information in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please refer to the complete Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report before you vote.

2017 Highlights

We Continued to Make Strategic and Financial Progress

In 2017, we made notable progress in both our strategic goals and financial performance, and achieved currency neutral growth in all of our key metrics. The recently-enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act impacted our reported results for 2017, as we recorded a provisional net charge of $139 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 due to the changes resulting from the Tax Act.

 2017 Results (GAAP basis)      

        Change vs.        

Prior Year

 

 Net Sales

 

 

  

 

$3.4 billion

 

 

  

 

9%

 

 

 Operating Profit

 

  

 

$581 million

 

 

  

 

2%

 

 

 

 Diluted Net Earnings Per Share

 

 

  

 

$3.72

 

 

  

 

(26)%

 

 

LOGO

In 2017, our payouts to shareholders, made through a combination of dividends and share repurchases, totaled 56%, consistent with our targeted range of 50% to 60% of adjusted net income*. We increased our quarterly dividend by 8% and our Board extended our repurchase program through December 31, 2022, authorizing a total of $300 million for repurchases under the extended program.

* See reconciliation of GAAP toNon-GAAP financial measures in Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  i

Proxy Statement Summary SALES* ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT* ADJUSTED EPS* Currency Impact Net


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Vision 2020 Strategy

In 2017, we refreshed our Vision 2020 strategy and continued to execute on the four pillars of the strategy, including the following achievements:

 Pillar

2017 Achievements

 Innovating Firsts

•   Achieved growth in encapsulation-related sales

•   Achieved growth in sweetness and savory modulation portfolio sales

•   Launched three new captive fragrance ingredients

•   Commercialized three natural modulators

 Win Where We Compete

•   Opened a fully renovated and expanded facility in Cairo, Egypt to support our regional focus on growth in the Middle East and Africa

•   Launched TastepointSM by IFF to service dynamicmid-tier customers

 Become Our Customers’ Partner

 of Choice

•   LaunchedRe-Imagine platform in Flavors, to accelerate innovation and increase agility to capture unmet opportunities in the changing food and beverage market

•   Introduced our unique IFF Taste Design, a combination of artisanal, handcrafted techniques and proprietary technologies that drive consumer preference and market differentiation

•   Achieved EcoVadis “Gold” status for sustainable performance and CDP “A” rating in climate change and“A-” rating in water assessments

•   Joined FReSH, a project of the World Business Council on Sustainable Development, designed to accelerate transformational change in global food systems

 Strengthen and Expand the

 Portfolio

•   Acquired Fragrance Resources to further improve our market position in specialty fine fragrances and strengthen our position in the U.S. and Germany

•   Acquired PowderPure to further expand product offerings of clean label flavors solutions

•   Achieved growth in cosmetic active ingredients

iiIFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Corporate Governance Highlights

  Our Corporate Governance Policies Reflect Best Practices

Ø    Directors other than our CEO are Independent

Ø    Diverse Board Brings Balance of Skills, Professional Experience and Perspectives

Ø    Independent Lead Director Facilitates and Strengthens the Board’s Independent Oversight

Ø    Formal Board and Executive Succession Planning

Ø    Annual Election of Directors

Ø    Proxy AccessBy-Law Provisions

Ø    Majority Voting and Director Resignation Policy in Elections

Ø    Prohibit Short Sales or Hedging of Our Stock By Our Employees, Officers and Directors

Ø    No Exclusive Forum orFee-Shifting Provisions

Ø    Executives and Directors are Subject to Rigorous Stock Retention Guidelines

Ø    Annual Board and Committee Assessments

Ø    Extensive Executive Clawback Policy

Ø    No Shareholder Rights Plan (“Poison Pill”)

Ø    Long Standing Commitment to Sustainability

Ø    No Limitation on Shareholder Litigation Rights

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  iii


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Matter

  Proposal 1

    Election of 11

    Director Nominees

 Board RecommendationLOGO 
Page Reference
(for more details)
Election

The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of Directors

FORall Director Nominees

Our Nominating and Governance Committee and our Board have determined that each Director Nominee

5
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFOR25
Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationFOR50
2015 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
the nominees possesses the skills and qualifications to collectively comprise a highly effective Board

 LOGOSee “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” beginning on page 1 of this Proxy Statement
In 2015, we announced our Vision 2020 strategy, which focuses on building differentiation

Director Nominees

        

Committee Membership

 

 Name and Primary Occupation

 

 

Joined

 

 

Age

 

 

Indep.

 

 

 

Audit

 

 

 

Comp.

 

 

 

Nom.& Gov.

 

 Marcello V. Bottoli

 Partner, Es Vedra Capital Advisors LLP

 

 2007

 

 56

 

 

 

 LOGO    

 Dr. Linda Buck

 Full Member, Fred Hutchinson Cancer
 Research Center

 

 2007

 

 71

 

 

 

     

 

 Michael L. Ducker

 President and CEO, FedEx Freight

 

 2014

 

 64

 

 

 

   

 

  

 David R. Epstein

 Executive Partner, Flagship Pioneering

 

 2016

 

 56

 

 

 

     

 

 Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

 President and CEO, TIAA

 

 2010

 

 66

 

 

 

   LOGO  

 John F. Ferraro

 Former Global COO, Ernst & Young

 

 2015

 

 62

 

 

 

 LOGO  LOGO    

 Andreas Fibig

 Chairman and CEO, IFF

 

 2011

 

 56

 

        

 Christina Gold

 Former CEO, The Western Union Company

 

 2013

 

 70

 

 

 

   

 

 LOGO

 Katherine M. Hudson

 Former CEO, Brady Corporation

 

 2008

 

 71

 

 

 

   

 

  

 Dale F. Morrison (Lead Director)

 Founding Partner of TriPointe Capital Partners

 

 2011

 

 69

 

 

 

 LOGO 

 

 

 

 Stephen Williamson

 Senior Vice President and CFO, Thermo Fisher  Scientific

 

 2017

 

 51

 

 

 

 LOGO    

 LOGO Committee Chair    LOGO Financial Expert

      

Skills and accelerating profitable growth. During 2015, we began to execute on the four pillars of this strategy with the following achievements:

Qualifications

Our Board continuously evaluates desired attributes in light of the Company’s strategy and needs. Key skills, qualifications and experience currently maintained on the Board include:

“Innovating Firsts” — strengthening our position and driving differentiation in priority R&D platforms:
LOGO

ivIFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT

International and Emerging Markets M&A Operations R&D / Innovation Corporate Governance Sustainability Financial and Accounting Risk and Crisis Management Consumer Products Technology / IT Regulatory


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Our Fragrance encapsulation portfolio improved double-digits on a currency neutral basis, led primarily by Fabric Care, as well as Toiletries and Home Care, which also grew double-digits.
We launched four new captive and proprietary Fragrance Ingredient molecules.
Sales of our Flavors sweetness and savory modulation portfolio improved strong double-digits as we added two new natural taste modulators.
Proprietary Flavors delivery systems grew strong double-digits globally given the expansion into additional categories.



“Win Where We Compete” —achieving a #1 or #2 market leadership position in key markets and categories, and with specific customers:
We fortified our market share position in North American Flavors, one of our key markets, with our acquisition of Ottens Flavors.
North American Flavors grew 11%.
We continued to leverage our long-standing presence in emerging markets, which grew 5% on a currency neutral basis, led by double digit growth in the Middle East and Africa.
From a category perspective, Home Care improved high single digits globally on a currency neutral basis.
“Become Our Customers’ Partner of Choice” — attaining commercial excellence by providing our customers with in-depth local consumer understanding, industry-leading innovation, outstanding service and the highest quality products:
We continued our commitment to sustainability and innovation, winning multiple global sustainability certifications.
Our largest Flavors customer awarded us an innovation award for North America.
We continued to expand our relationships with regional customers and achieved additional core list status with several key customers across both flavors and fragrances.
“Strengthen and Expand the Portfolio” — pursuing value-creation through partnerships, collaborations, and acquisitions within flavors, fragrances and adjacencies:
During 2015, we negotiated and closed two acquisitions that fit into our Vision 2020 strategy.
Through our acquisition of Ottens Flavors in May 2015, we expanded our flavors position in North America and increased our penetration of small and mid-size customers.
Our acquisition of Lucas Meyer Cosmetics expanded our ingredients offerings into the cosmetic industry thereby allowing us to build greater customer intimacy and entry into the skin care and hair care businesses.
2015 was a solid year for the Company in financial and operating performance.
(dollars in millions except earnings per share amounts) 2013
 2014
 2015
Net Sales 
$2,953
 
$3,089
 
$3,023
Currency Neutral Sales Growth* 5% 5% 5%
Diluted Net Earnings Per Share - as Reported 
$4.29
 
$5.06
 
$5.16
Diluted Net Earnings Per Share - as Adjusted* 
$4.46
 
$5.08
 
$5.25
Operating Profit - as Reported 
$516
 
$592
 
$588
Operating Profit - as Adjusted* 
$540
 
$601
 
$612
Net Cash Provided by Operations 
$408
 
$518
 
$434
*   See reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP financial measures in Exhibit A to this proxy statement.
For more information relating to the Company’s financial performance, please review our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 1, 2016.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
ALIGNING PAY WITH PERFORMANCE
Our compensation program for executive officers is designed to align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders by linking their compensation to the achievement of financial and operational performance metrics that build shareholder value.
Our annual incentive plan (“AIP”) provides awards based on (i) local currency sales growth, operating profit, gross margin and working capital, and (ii) individual objectives relating to leadership, succession planning and people development.
Our long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) aligns our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by paying 50% of the earned award in shares of our common stock, with awards based on the achievement of financial and total shareholder return targets by our executives.
In 2015, our financial performance exceeded all but one of the target levels for our performance metrics under our 2015 LTIP. For our 2015 AIP, at the corporate level, we achieved between threshold and target for three of the four financial performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the financial performance metrics. Our Fragrance business unit achieved between threshold and target for three of the four financial performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the financial performance metrics. Our Flavors business unit performance exceeded target for one of the four financial performance metrics, was between threshold and target for two of the financial performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the financial performance metrics. We encourage you to read our Compensation Discussion & Analysis (“CD&A”), beginning on page 29 of this proxy statement, which describes our pay for performance philosophy.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
The following facts outline certain of our corporate governance policies. For a comprehensive discussion of our corporate governance policies, see “Corporate Governance,” beginning on page 11 of this proxy statement.
Our Board has adopted a new “proxy access” by-law that permits eligible shareholders to nominate candidates for election to our Board.
Our Board consists entirely of independent directors, other than our Chairman and CEO.
We have an independent Lead Director to facilitate and strengthen the Board’s independent oversight.
Our Board is elected annually. Our Board is elected via a majority voting standard in uncontested elections.
Our Directors are subject to term limits.
Our Board is diverse, bringing an appropriate balance of skills, professional experience and perspectives.
Our executive clawback policies allow us to recoup certain amounts in cases of accounting misstatements, financial restatements and misstatements (without regard to fault), willful misconduct or violations of Company policy that are material and detrimental to the Company, and violations of non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality and similar covenants.
We require our executives and directors to meet stock retention guidelines.
We do not permit short sales or hedging of our stock by our employees, officers or directors.




PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page








PROXY STATEMENT
You are receiving this proxy statement because you own shares of IFF common stock that entitle you to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting. Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies from shareholders who wish to vote at the meeting. By using a proxy, you can vote even if you do not attend the meeting. This proxy statement describes the matters on which you are being asked to vote and provides information on those matters so you can make an informed decision.

I. ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
Q:What am I voting on?
A:
At the 2016 Annual Meeting you will be asked to vote on the following proposals. Our Board recommendation for each of these proposals is set forth below.

Proposal

Board
Recommendation
1.To elect eleven members of the Board of Directors, each to hold office for a one-year term expiring at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.FOR each Director Nominee
2.To ratify 2

Ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 20162018 fiscal year.year

  LOGO

The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal

Our Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 fiscal year

  LOGO  

See “Proposal 2 — Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” beginning on page 33 of this Proxy Statement

3.To approve,

Proposal 3

Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers  in 2015, which we refer to as “Say on Pay.”2017

  LOGO

The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal

Our Board recommends a vote “FOR” the advisory vote to approve executive compensation for the 2017 performance year

  LOGO  

See “Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” on page 61 of this Proxy Statement and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 37 of this Proxy Statement

We will also consider other business that properly comes before the meeting in accordance with New York law and our By-Laws.
Q:Who can vote?
A:Holders of our common stock at the close of business on March 8, 2016, are entitled to vote their shares at the 2016 Annual Meeting. As of March 8, 2016, there were 79,685,747 shares of common stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock issued and outstanding is entitled to one vote.
Q:What constitutes a quorum, and why is a quorum required?
A:We are required to have a quorum of shareholders present to conduct business at the meeting. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the record date (39,842,875 shares) will constitute a quorum, permitting us to conduct the business of the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares of common stock for which we have received executed proxies will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum at the meeting, regardless of how or whether such shares are voted on any specific proposal.
Q:What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “street name” holder?
A:If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered a “shareholder of record” or a “registered shareholder” of those shares. In this case, your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) has been sent to you directly by us.

1


If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee or custodian (each, a “Broker”), including shares you may own as a participant in one of our 401(k) plans, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, which are held in “street name.” A Notice has been forwarded to you by or on behalf of your Broker, who

Compensation Governance

Ourpay-for-performance compensation program is considered the shareholder of record of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your Broker how to vote your shares by following the instructions for voting set forthreflected in the Notice.

Q:How do I vote?
A:If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote:
via Internet;
by telephone;
by mail, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials; or
in person at the meeting.
Detailed instructions for Internet and telephone voting are set forth in the Notice, which contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement, annual report and shareholder notice online, and the printed proxy card.
If your shares are held in one of our 401(k) plans, your proxy will serve as a voting instruction for the trustee of the 401(k) plan, who will vote your shares as you instruct. To allow sufficient time for the trustee to vote, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 pm Eastern Daylight Time on April 29, 2016. If the trustee does not receive your instructions bystrong compensation governance that date, the trustee will vote the shares you hold through the 401(k) plan in the same proportion as those shares in the 401(k) plan for which voting instructions were received.
If you are a beneficial owner, you must follow the voting procedures of your Broker.
we have adopted.

Q:What are the requirements to elect the director nominees and to approve each of the proposals in this proxy statement?
A:    
ProposalWhat We Do  Vote Required

LOGO

Significant portion of NEO compensation in the form of at-risk variable compensation

  1.Election of Directors

LOGO

  Majority of Votes Cast

Variable compensation based on multiple performance metrics to encourage balanced incentives

  2.

LOGO

Appropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation to reward company, business unit and individual performance

LOGO

Majority of variable compensation awarded as equity-based awards

LOGO

Executive clawback policies to recoup cash and equity compensation upon certain triggering events

LOGO

Executives required to meet share retention guidelines

LOGO

Independent compensation consultant

LOGO

Annual risk assessment of compensation programs

What We Don’t Do

LOGO

No tax gross-ups on severance payments

LOGO

No single-trigger vesting of cash or equity-based awards upon change in control

LOGO

No short-sales, hedging or pledging of our stock by our employees, officers or directors

LOGO

No fixed-duration employment agreements with executive officers

LOGO

No stock option/SAR repricing or exchange of underwater options or SARs for cash without shareholder approval

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  v


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under our By-Laws, in an uncontested election of directors, as we have this year, a majority of votes cast is required in order for a director to be elected, which means that a nominee must receive a greater number of votes “FOR” his or her election than votes “AGAINST” in order to be elected. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” a director nominee.
Under our By-Laws, the votes cast “FOR” must exceed the votes cast “AGAINST” the ratification of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal year. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” this proposal.
Proposal 3 is an advisory vote. This means that while we ask shareholders to approve a resolution regarding Say on Pay, it is not an action that requires shareholder approval. If a majority of votes are cast “FOR” the Say on Pay proposal, we will consider the proposal to be approved. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” this proposal.

2


Principal Accountant Fees and Services

34

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and PermittedNon-Audit Services

34

Audit Committee Report

35
Q:Compensation Discussion and AnalysisWhat if I am a beneficial owner and I do not give the nominee voting instructions?
37
A:

Compensation Committee Report

If you are a beneficial owner and your shares are held in “street name,” the Broker is bound by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) regarding whether or not it can exercise discretionary voting power for any particular proposal if the Broker has not received voting instructions from you. Brokers have the authority to vote shares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions on certain routine matters. A broker non-vote occurs when a Broker returns a proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the Broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the proposal and has not received specific voting instructions for the proposal from the beneficial owner of the shares. Broker non-votes are considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but are not counted as votes cast.60
The table below sets forth, for each proposal on the ballot, whether a Broker can exercise discretion and vote your shares absent your instructions and, if not, the impact of such broker non-vote on the approval of the proposal.
Proposal
Can Brokers
3 — Advisory Vote Absent
Instructions?
Impact of
Broker
Non-Vote
on Executive Compensation   61 
1.Election of DirectorsNoNone
2.Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmYesNot Applicable
3.Say on PayNoNone
Q:Executive CompensationWhat if I sign62

Summary Compensation Table

62

Pay Ratio

63

2017 All Other Compensation

64

Employment Agreements or Arrangements

65

2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

66

Long-Term Incentive Plan

68

Equity Compensation Plan Information

69

2017 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

70

2017 Stock Vested

72

Pension Benefits

73

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.

74

Termination and return my proxy without making any selections?Change in Control Arrangements

76

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

81
A:Information About The MeetingIf you sign and return your proxy without making any selections, your shares will be voted “FOR” each of the director nominees, and “FOR” each of the two other proposals. If other matters properly come before the meeting, the proxy holders will have the authority to vote on those matters for you at their discretion. If your shares are held in “street name,” see the question above on how to vote your shares.85
Q:Other MattersHow do I change my vote?89

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

89

Proxy Solicitation Costs

89

Shareholder Proposals

89

Shareholder Communications

89

Electronic Delivery

90

Householding

90

Available Information

90
A:Exhibit A — GAAP toNon-GAAP ReconciliationsA shareholder of record may revoke his or her proxy by giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary before the meeting, by delivering a later-dated proxy (either in writing, by telephone or over the Internet), or by voting in person at the 2016 Annual Meeting.91
If your shares are held in “street name,” you may change your vote by following your Broker’s procedures for revoking or changing your proxy.
Q:What shares are covered by my proxy card?
A:Your proxy reflects all shares owned by you at the close of business on March 8, 2016. For participants in our 401(k) plans, shares held in your account as of that date are included in your proxy.
Q:What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?
A:If you receive more than one proxy card, it means that you hold shares in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, you should sign and return each proxy card. Alternatively, if you vote by telephone or via the Internet, you will need to vote once for each proxy card and voting instruction card you receive.

vi  IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


3


Q:Who can attend the 2016 Annual Meeting?
A:Only shareholders and our invited guests are permitted to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting. To gain admittance, you must bring a form of personal identification to the meeting, where your name will be verified against our shareholder list. If a Broker holds your shares and you plan to attend the meeting, you should bring a brokerage statement showing your ownership of the shares as of the record date or a letter from the Broker confirming such ownership, and a form of personal identification. If you wish to vote your shares that are held by a Broker at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy from your Broker and bring such proxy to the meeting.
Q:If I plan to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting, should I still vote by proxy?
A:Yes. Casting your vote in advance does not affect your right to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting. If you send in your proxy card and also attend the meeting, you do not need to vote again at the meeting unless you want to change your vote. Written ballots will be available at the 2016 Annual Meeting for shareholders of record.
Q:How can I listen to the live audio webcast of the 2016 Annual Meeting?
A:You may listen to a live audio webcast of the 2016 Annual Meeting at www.iff.com. The webcast will allow you to listen to the Annual Meeting, but shareholders accessing the 2016 Annual Meeting through the webcast will not be considered present at the 2016 Annual Meeting and will not be able to vote their shares through the webcast or ask questions. If you plan to listen to the live audio webcast, then please submit your vote prior to the 2016 Annual Meeting using one of the methods described under “How do I vote?” above. An archived copy of the webcast will be available at www.iff.com following the 2016 Annual Meeting. Registration to listen to the webcast will be required. We have included our website address for reference only. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.


4

LOGO


II. PROPOSAL I — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Current Board

Our Board of Directors (“Board”) currently has twelve members. Mr. Howell, who has served on our Board since 2004, will retire from our Board at the 2018 Annual Meeting in accordance with our term limit policy. Following the 2018 Annual Meeting, the size of our Board will be reduced to eleven members.

Andreas Fibig (Chairman)

Dale F. Morrison (Lead Director)

Marcello V. Bottoli

       Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.Henry W. Howell, Jr.

Dr. Linda Buck

       John F. Ferraro

Katherine M. Hudson

Michael L. Ducker

       Christina Gold

Stephen Williamson

David R. Epstein

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, of our Board, our Board has nominated the followingeleven of our current directors for election at the 20162018 Annual Meeting, each for aone-year term that expires at the 20172019 Annual Meeting: (i) Marcello V. Bottoli, (ii) Dr. Linda Buck, (iii) Michael L. Ducker, (iv) David R. Epstein, (v) Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., (vi) John F. Ferraro; (vii) Andreas Fibig, (viii) Christina Gold, (ix) Henry W. Howell, Jr., (x) Katherine M. Hudson,Meeting.

Director Nominee Experience and (xi) Dale F. Morrison. Each nomineeQualifications

Board Membership Criteria and Selection

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we have at least six but not more than fifteen directors. To ensure independence and to provide the breadth of needed expertise and diversity of our Board, the Board periodically reviews its size and makes appropriate adjustments pursuant to ourBy-Laws. Our Nominating and Governance Committee, together with other Board members, from time to time, as appropriate, identifies the need for new Board members.

Board candidates are considered based on various criteria which may change over time and as the composition of the Board changes. At a minimum, our Nominating and Governance Committee considers the following factors as part of its review of all director candidates and in recommending potential director candidates:

judgment, character, expertise, skills and knowledge useful to the oversight of our business;

diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, experiences and other demographics;

business or other relevant experience; and

the extent to which the interplay of the candidate’s expertise, skills, knowledge and experience with that of other Board members will build a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to our needs and to the requirements and standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Proposed director candidates who satisfy the criteria and who otherwise qualify for membership on the Board are identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee. In identifying candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee seeks input and participation from other Board members and other appropriate sources so that all points of view are considered and the best possible candidates identified. The Nominating and Governance Committee also has consentedengaged a search firm to serve if elected. Proxies cannotassist it in

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  1

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

identifying potential candidates. Members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and other Board members, as appropriate, interview selected director candidates, evaluate the director candidates and determine which candidates are to be voted for a greater numberrecommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee to the Board. Our Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the suitability of persons thanpotential candidates nominated by shareholders in the number of nominees named.

same manner as other candidates recommended to the Nominating and Governance Committee.

We believe that each of our nominees has the experience, skills and qualities to fully perform his or her duties as a director and to contribute to our success. Each of our nominees is being nominated because he or she adheres to the highest standards of personal integrity and possesses excellent interpersonal and communication skills, is highly accomplished in his or her field, has an understanding of the interests and issues that are important to our shareholders and is able to dedicate sufficient time to fulfilling his or her obligations as a director. Our nominees as a group complement each other and each other’s respective experiences, skills and qualities.

Each nominee’s principal occupation

Diversity and other pertinent information aboutTenure

Diversity is one of the factors that the Nominating and Governance Committee considers in identifying and selecting director nominees. As part of this process, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates how a particular experience, qualifications, attributescandidate would strengthen and skills that ledincrease the diversity of the Board in terms of how that candidate may contribute to concludethe Board’s overall balance of perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, experience, skill sets and expertise in substantive matters pertaining to our business. To maintain a balance of experience and new perspectives, our Corporate Governance Guidelines also sets guidance on the number of full annual terms that such person should serve as a director appearscan serve on the following pages.

Theour Board.

We Strive for a Balanced and Diverse Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the following director nominees.


5


NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

DiversityTenure

Executive

Leadership

Experience

MARCELLO V. BOTTOLI, 54
  
Director Since:  2007
Board Committees:
Compensation (until May 2016)
Audit (beginning May 2016)

              < 4 Yrs
                > 8 Yrs

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

4 to 8 Yrs

4 of our 11 Director

Nominees are women or

minorities

82% of our Director

Nominees have served

8 or less full annual terms

on our Board

91% of our Director

Nominees have Senior

Executive Leadership

Experience

2IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Shareholder Nominations and Proxy Access

Under ourBy-Laws, if a shareholder wishes to submit a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee, or wishes a director nomination to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for an annual meeting pursuant to our proxy accessby-law, the shareholder must deliver or mail notice of the request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, in writing, so that it is received not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders. However, if the annual meeting is not within 30 days of the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting, such notice must be received by the Corporate Secretary no later than 10 days following the mailing of notice of the annual meeting or public disclosure of the annual meeting date, whichever occurs first. The notice must be accompanied by the information concerning the director candidate and nominating shareholder described in Article I, Section 3 and Section 4 of ourBy-Laws. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also request any additional background or other information from any director candidate or recommending shareholder as it may deem appropriate. Our proxy accessby-law permits an eligible shareholder (or group of up to 20 eligible shareholders) who owns shares representing at least 3% of our outstanding shares, and has held the shares for at least 3 years, to nominate and include in our proxy materials for an annual meeting director candidates constituting up to 20% of our Board.

Continued Service

The Nominating and Governance Committee annually reviews each current Board member’s suitability for continued service as a member of our Board and recommends to the Board whether such member should bere-nominated. In addition, each director is required to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee if, during his or her tenure as a director, such director:

has a material change in employment,

has a significant change in personal circumstances which may adversely affect his or her reputation, or the reputation of the Company, or

intends to join the board of anotherfor-profit company,

so that the Nominating and Governance Committee can review the change and make a recommendation to the full Board regarding the director’s continued service. Such resignation becomes effective only upon acceptance by the Board.

Ö

YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF
EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  3


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Nominees for Director

Marcello V. Bottoli

LOGO

Director Since:

2007

Committees:

• Audit

Age:56

Business Experience

An Italian national with extensive international experience, Mr. Bottoli has beenis a Partner at Es Vedra Capital Advisors LLP, an operating partner ofadvisory and investment firm dedicated to venture capital and growth equity. Previously, Mr. Bottoli was an Operating Partner at Boston-based Advent International, a global private equity firm, sincebetween 2010 and 2015. Mr. Bottoli also served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Pandora A/S, a designer, manufacturer and marketer of hand-finished and modern jewelry, from August 2011 until March 2012. Mr. Bottoli served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Samsonite Inc., a luggage manufacturer and distributor, from March 2004 through January 2009, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Louis Vuitton Malletier, a manufacturer and retailer of luxury handbags and accessories, from 2001 through 2002. Previously, Mr. Bottoli held a number of roles with Benckiser N.V., and then Reckitt Benckiser plc, a home, health and personal care products company, following the merger of Benckiser with Reckitt & Colman Ltd. His experience as

Public Board Memberships

•  Pandora A/S, a chief executive and emphasis on consumer products, strategic insights and marketing as well as his experience with strategic transactions, has enabled Mr. Bottoli to provide many insights and contributions to our Board. Mr. Bottoli is Chairman of Pharmafortune S.A., a pharmaceuticals and biotechnologydesigner, manufacturer and is a membermarketer of the advisory board of Aldo Group, a Canadian footwear retailer,hand-finished and serves on the board of directors of Desigual, an international fashion retailer based in Spain. Mr. Bottoli served on the board ofcontemporary jewelry, from 2010 to 2014

  True Religion Apparel, Inc., a California-based fashion jeans, sportswear and accessory manufacturer and retailer, from 2009 to 2013 on the board of Pandora A/S from 2010 to 2014, on the Board of

  Ratti Spa,S.p.A., an Italian manufacturer ofhigh-end fabrics and textiles for the fashion industry from 2003 to 2010

Additional Accomplishments and onMemberships

•  Chairman of the board of Pharmafortune S.A., a pharmaceuticals and biotechnology manufacturer

  Board of Blushington LLC,Desigual, an international fashion retailer based in Spain

•  Board of Pelostop S.A., a California-based makeup and beauty services retailer between 2011based in Spain

•  Board of Il Bisonte S.p.A., a leather goods retailer based in Italy

•  Board of FaceGym Ltd., a beauty services retailer based in London

•  Advisory Board of Aldo Group, a Canadian footwear retailer from 2013 to 2018

Qualifications

Mr. Bottoli brings to our Board his experience as a chief executive and 2014.


as an investor, with an emphasis on consumer products, strategic insights and marketing. In addition, his experience with strategic transactions and M&A has enabled Mr. Bottoli to provide many insights and contributions to our Board.

4IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Dr. Linda Buck

  
DR. LINDA BUCK, 69

LOGO

Director Since:

2007

Committees:

• Nominating and Governance

Age:71

    
Director Since:  2007
Board Committees:
Nominating and Governance

Business Experience

Dr. Linda Buck has been a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator since 1994, aFull Member of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center since 2002, and2002. In addition, Dr. Buck has been an Affiliate Professor of Physiology and Biophysics at the University of Washington since 2003. She was previously Full Professor of Neurobiology at Harvard Medical School. Dr. Buck serves onBuck’s research has provided key insights into the mechanisms that underlie the sense of smell and she has been the recipient of numerous awards, including The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2004.

Public Board Memberships

•  DeCode Genetics Inc., a biotechnology company, from 2005 to 2009

Additional Accomplishments and Memberships

•  Scientific Advisory BoardsBoard of The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and The Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, and previously served on the Medical Advisory Board of The Gairdner Foundation, a Canadian non-profit organization devoted to the recognition of outstanding achievement in biomedical research worldwide. She is a member

•  Member of the International Advisory Panel of the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the largest private foundation promoting scientific research in Sweden and the

•  President’s Council of the New York Academy of Sciences. Dr. Buck is an electedSciences

•  Elected Member of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, the European Academy of Sciences, and the Royal Society, the United Kingdom’s national academy of science. science

•  Previous Member of the Medical Advisory Board of The Gairdner Foundation, a Canadiannon-profit organization devoted to the recognition of outstanding achievement in biomedical research worldwide

Qualifications

Dr. Buck’s research has provided key insights into the mechanisms that underlie the sense of smell and she has been the recipient of numerous awards, including The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2004. In May 2015, Dr. Buck received an honorary Doctor of Science degree from Harvard University. Herscientific knowledge is important to our research and development efforts in both flavors and fragrances, as is Dr. Buck’sher technical and advisory board experience in evaluating a host of issues. Dr. Buck served on the Board of Directors of DeCode Genetics Inc., a biotechnology company, from 2005issues that are relevant to 2009.

our innovation and research and development activities.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  5



6


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Michael L. Ducker

MICHAEL L. DUCKER, 62
 

LOGO

Director Since:

2014

Board

Committees:

• Compensation

Age:64

Business Experience

Mr. Ducker has been President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Freight since January 2015. In that role, he provides strategic direction for FedEx'sFedEx’s less-than-truckload (LTL) companies throughout North America and for FedEx Custom Critical, a leading carrier of time sensitive, critical shipments. Mr. Ducker was formerly the Chief Operating Officer and President of International for FedEx Express, where he led all customer-facing aspects of the company’s U.S. operations and its international business, spanning more than 220 countries and territories across the globe. Mr. Ducker also oversaw FedEx Trade Networks and FedEx Supply Chain. During his FedEx career, which began in 1975, Mr. Ducker has also served as president of FedEx Express Asia Pacific in Hong Kong and led the Southeast Asia and Middle East regions from Singapore, as well as Southern Europe from Milan, Italy. His

Additional Accomplishments and Memberships

•  Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce

•  Board of Amway Corporation

•  National Advisory Board of the Salvation Army

•  Executive Committee and Treasurer of the American Trucking Association

•  Board of the American Transportation Research Institute

Qualifications

Mr. Ducker’s significant senior executive and international experience at a global organizationcoupled with his extensive expertise in complex operations and logistics complements the strength of our Board. Mr. Ducker servesDucker’s current position as anChief Executive Officer of FedEx Freight provides him with knowledge of a number of important areas that assist our Board, Memberincluding leadership, risk assessment and Chairman of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and as a board member of the Coalition of Service Industries. Mr. Ducker also serves on the board of directors of Amway Corporation, the National Advisory Board of the Salvation Army, the Executive Committee of the American Trucking Association and as a member of the American Transportation Research Institute Board of Directors.operational issues.

6IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

David R. Epstein

  
DAVID R. EPSTEIN, 54

LOGO

Director Since:

2016

Committees:

• Nominating and
Governance

Age: 56

    
Director Since: 2016
Board Committees:
Audit

Business Experience

Mr. Epstein is an Executive Partner at Flagship Pioneering, a venture capital firm focused on life sciences companies, where he has served since January 2017. Previously, Mr. Epstein served as Division Head and CEO atof Novartis Pharmaceuticals, a division of Novartis AG, a Swiss multinational pharmaceutical company, and isfrom January 2010 until July 2016. In addition, Mr. Epstein was a member of Novartis’s Executive Committee. He has been the Head of Novartis Pharmaceuticals since 2010. From September 2000 to February 2010, Mr. Epstein served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Novartis Oncology division. He joined Sandoz, the predecessor of Novartis, in 1989 and held various leadership positions of increasing responsibility, including Chief Operating Officer of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in the United States and Global Head of Novartis Specialty Medicines until August 2000. Before joining Sandoz, Mr. Epstein was an associate in the strategy practice of Booz Allen Hamilton, a consulting firm. Mr. Epstein’s extensive global business experience

Additional Accomplishments and understandingMemberships

•  Executive Chairman of research and development initiatives provides valuable insights to our Board. Mr. Epstein servedthe Board of Rubius Therapeutics, Inc., a Flagship company focused on the boarddevelopment of Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals from 2008 to 2010 andred blood cell therapeutics

•  Chairman of the Board of Axcella Health, Inc., a company focused on the boarddevelopment of products to treat multifactorial diseases

•  Board of Evelo Biosciences, a leading immuno-microbiome company

•  Novartis Oncology and Molecular Diagnostics from 1999 to 2010. He also participated inRepresentative on the inaugural CEO Roundtable on Cancer, a non-profit organization working to make continual progress toward the elimination of cancer which was held May 8,from 2001 to 2008

•  Named by FierceBiotech as one of “The 25 most influential people in Biopharma”

Qualifications

Mr. Epstein’s extensive global business experience, deep understanding of life sciences and wasunderstanding of research and development initiatives provides valuable insights to our Board. We benefit from Mr. Epstein’s senior leadership experience and achievement in both business and the Novartis member representative through 2008.

life sciences.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  7



7


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

ROGER W. FERGUSON, JR., 64
 
 

LOGO

Director Since:

2010

Board

Committees:

• Compensation (Chair)

Age:66

Business Experience

Mr. Ferguson has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of TIAA (formerly TIAA-CREF), a major financial services company, since April 2008. He joinedPrior to joining TIAA, after his tenure at Swiss Re, a global reinsurance company, where heMr. Ferguson served as Chairman of the firm’sSwiss Re America Holding Corporation, Head of Financial Services, and a member of the Executive Committeeglobal insurance company, from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Ferguson currently servesserved as Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve System from 1999 to 2006. He represented the Federal Reserve on several international policy groups and served on key Federal Reserve System committees, including Payment System Oversight, Reserve Bank Operations and Supervision and Regulation. In addition, Mr. Ferguson led the board of directors ofFed’s initial response on 9/11. From 1984 to 1997, Mr. Ferguson was an associate and partner at McKinsey & Company.

Public Board Memberships

  General Mills, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of branded consumer foods

•  Alphabet Inc., the parent holding company of Google Inc.

Additional Accomplishments and the Advisory Board of Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP, a global alternative asset manager. He serves on the boardsMemberships

Boards of a number of charitable and non-governmental organizations, including the Institute for Advanced Study, Memorial Sloan-KetteringSloan Kettering Cancer Center and the American Council of Life Insurers, the Partnership for New York, and Math for America. He is Smithsonian Institution

Chairman of The Conference Board a member of the Executive Committee of the Business-Higher Education Forum, and a member

•  Member of the Economic Club of New York

•  Member of the Council on Foreign Relations and

•  Member of the Group of Thirty. Mr. Ferguson is also a fellow ofThirty

•  Fellowof the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-chairCo-Chair of the Academy’s Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education. Mr. Ferguson previously served onEducation

•  Fellowof the Congressional Budget Office's PanelAmerican Philosophical Society

•  PreviousChairman and Executive Committee Member of Economic Advisers. Mr. Ferguson holds a B.A. and a Ph.D. in Economics and a J.D., all from Harvard University. the Business-Higher Education Forum

Qualifications

Mr. Ferguson brings to our Board his sound business judgment, and extensive knowledge of the finance industry.financial services industry and regulatory experience. We benefit from Mr. Ferguson’s service as Chief Executive Officer of TIAA and his experience as a member of other public company boards, which provides him an enhanced perspective on issues applicable to our company.

 

8IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

John F. Ferraro

  
JOHN F. FERRARO, 60

LOGO

Director Since:

2015

Committees:

• Audit (Chair)

Age:62

    
Director Since: 2015 
Board Committees: Audit (Chair beginning May 2016)

Business Experience

Mr. Ferraro was the global chief operating officerGlobal Chief Operating Officer of Ernst & Young, a leading professional services firm, from 2007 to January 2015. In that role, he was responsible for the overall operations and services of Ernst & Young worldwide. Prior to the COO role, Mr. Ferraro served in several leadership positions, including as Global Vice Chair of Audit and as the senior advisory partner on some of the firm’s largest and global accounts. Mr. Ferraro began his career with Ernst & Young Milwaukee in 1976 and has served a variety of global companies. He has worked in Europe (London and Rome), throughout the Midwest (Chicago, Cleveland and Kansas City) and New York. Mr. Ferraro has served on the board of

Public Board Memberships

  Advance Auto Parts, Inc., an automotive aftermarket parts provider since February 2015, and on the board of

  ManpowerGroup Inc., a global workforce solution and service provider since January 2016. He founded

Additional Accomplishments and Memberships

•  Founded the Audit Committee Leadership Network in 2003 and is a member

•  Board of theTrustees of Boston College High School board of trustees. He is aand Marquette University

  CPA and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Ferraro was elected to the Marquette University Board of Trustees in 2006, served as vice chair from 2011 to 2014, and was elected chair in 2014. Accountants

Qualifications

Mr. Ferraro brings to our Board his extensive accounting,executive, auditing and executiveaccounting experience working with large and global corporations.

We benefit from his extensive understanding of global business operations, markets and risks.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  9



8


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Andreas Fibig

ANDREAS FIBIG, 54
 

LOGO

Director Since:

2011

Chairman of the Board

Board

Age:56

Business Experience

Mr. Fibig joined our Board in 2011 and has been our Chairman since December 2014 and Chief Executive Officer since September 2014. Previously, he served as President and Chairman of the Board of Management of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, the pharmaceutical division of Bayer AG, from September 2008 to September 2014. Prior to that position, Mr. Fibig held a number of positions of increasing responsibility at Pfizer Inc., a research-based pharmaceutical company, including as Senior Vice President of the US Pharmaceutical Operations group from 2007 through 2008 and as President, Latin America, Africa and Middle East from 2006 through 2007. Mr. Fibig has been nominated for election to the Board of Novo Nordisk, a global healthcare company, for its March 2018 annual meeting.

Public Board Memberships

•  Board of Bunge Limited, a leading agribusiness and food company with integrated operations, until the Bunge Limited May 2018 annual meeting

Additional Accomplishments and Memberships

•  Executive Committee of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, aCEO-led organization focused on creating a sustainable future for business, society and the environment

•  German American Chamber of Commerce, Inc.

•  German Academy of New York

Qualifications

Mr. Fibig’s prior work experience with various pharmaceutical companies has provided him with extensive experience in international business, product development and strategic planning, which are directly translatable to his work as our Chairman and CEO. Mr. Fibig chairs the Board of Trustees of the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology.

10IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Christina Gold

  
CHRISTINA GOLD, 68

LOGO

Director Since:

2013

Committees:

• Compensation

• Nominating and Governance (Chair)

Age:70

    

Business Experience

Director Since:  2013


Board Committees: Compensation, Nominating and Governance
From September 2006 until September 2010, Ms. Gold was Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of The Western Union Company, a leader in global money movement and payment services. She was President of Western Union Financial Services, Inc. and Senior Executive Vice President of First Data Corporation, former parent company of The Western Union Company and provider of electronic commerce and payment solutions, from May 2002 to September 2006. Prior to that, Ms. Gold served as Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Excel Communications, Inc., a former telecommunications ande-commerce services provider, from October 1999 to May 2002. From 1998 to 1999, Ms. Gold served as President and CEO of Beaconsfield Group, Inc., a direct selling advisory firm that she founded. Prior to founding Beaconsfield Group, Ms. Gold spent 28 years (from 1970 to 1998) with Avon Products, Inc., a leading global beauty company, in a variety of positions, including as Executive Vice President, Global Direct Selling Development, Senior Vice President and later President of Avon North America, and Senior Vice President & CEO of Avon Canada.

Public Board Memberships

•  ITT Corporation, a manufacturer of highly engineered components and technology solutions for industrial markets

•  Korn/Ferry International, a leadership and talent management organization

•  Exelis, Inc., a diversified, global aerospace, defense and information solutions company, from October 2011 to May 2013

Additional Accomplishments and Memberships

•  Board of New York Life Insurance, a private mutual life insurance company

•  Board of Safe Water Network, anon-profit organization working to develop locally owned, sustainable solutions to provide safe drinking water

•  Board of Governors of Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada

Qualifications

Ms. Gold brings a number of valuable characteristics to our Board, including her extensive international and domestic business experience, her familiarity with the Company’s customer base, her financial expertise and her prior experience as a chief executive officer. Ms. Gold is currently a director of ITT Corporation, a manufacturer of highly engineered components and technology solutions for industrial markets (since 1997), New York Life Insurance, a private mutual life insurance company, and Korn/Ferry International, a leadership and talent management organization. From October 2011 to May 2013, Ms. Gold was a director of Exelis, Inc., a diversified, global aerospace, defense and information solutions company. She also sits on the board of Safe Water Network, a non-profit organization working to develop locally owned, sustainable solutions to provide safe drinking water, and is a member of the Board of Governors of Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  11



9


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Katherine M. Hudson

HENRY W. HOWELL, JR., 74
Director Since:  2004
Board Committees: Audit, Nominating and Governance (Chair)
Until 2000, Mr. Howell served in various positions during his 34 years with J.P. Morgan, a financial services firm. At J.P. Morgan, Mr. Howell secured extensive business development, finance and international management experience which enables him to provide both a public and a private sector perspective on corporate finance, corporate governance and mergers and acquisitions. This experience also serves us well in conjunction with his service on our Nominating and Governance and Audit Committees. While at J.P. Morgan, Mr. Howell held several overseas positions including head of banking operations in Germany and Chief Executive Officer of J.P. Morgan’s Australian merchant banking affiliate, which was publicly listed. Both of these assignments enhanced his ability to analyze complex international business and financial matters. He is currently Chairman of the board of trustees of the Norton Art Museum and is a life trustee of the Chicago History Museum.
  
KATHERINE M. HUDSON, 69

LOGO

Director Since:

2008

Committees:

• Compensation

Age:71

    
Director Since:  2008
Board Committees: Audit (Chair)(until May 2016)
Compensation (beginning May 2016)

Business Experience

As Chairperson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Brady Corporation, a global manufacturer of identification solutions and specialty industrial products, from 1994 until 2004, Ms. Hudson oversaw a doubling of annual revenues. Her prior experience during 24 years with Eastman Kodak, an imaging technology products provider, covered various areas of responsibility, including systems analysis, supply chain, finance and information technology. Her general management experience spans both commercial and consumer product lines. Ms. Hudson served as

Public Board Memberships

Charming Shoppes, Inc., a directorwoman’s specialty retailer from 2000 to 2012

CNH Global NV, a manufacturer of agricultural and construction equipment, from 1999 to 2006.

Apple Computer Corporation, a designer and manufacturer of consumer electronics and software products, CNH Global NV, a manufacturer of agricultural and construction equipment where she was as a member of the audit committee, and, between 2000 and 2012, Charming Shoppes, Inc., a woman’s specialty retailer, where she served as chair of the audit committee. from 1994 to 1997

Qualifications

Ms. Hudson’s executive experience in supply chain, finance and information technology at Eastman Kodak and Brady Corporation and her governance leadership on other boards have translated to sound guidance to our Board on governance, supply chain, finance matters and as Chair of our Audit Committee.information technology.

12IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Dale F. Morrison

  
DALE F. MORRISON, 67

LOGO

Director Since:

2011

Committees:

• Audit

• Compensation

• Nominating and Governance

Lead Director

Age:69

    
Director Since:  2011
Board Committees: Audit, Nominating and Governance,
Lead Director
(Compensation beginning May 2016)

Business Experience

Mr. Morrison has been a founding partner of TriPointe Capital Partners, a private equity firm, since 2011. Prior to TriPointe, he served from 2004 until 2011 as the President and Chief Executive Officer of McCain Foods Limited, an international leader in the frozen food industry. A food industry veteran, his experience includes service as Chief Executive Officer and President of Campbell Soup Company, various roles at General Foods and PepsiCo and as an operating partner of Fenway Partners, a private equity firm.

Public Board Memberships

InterContinental Hotels Group, an international hotel company

Trane Inc. from 2005 to 2008

Additional Accomplishments and Memberships

Non-Executive Chairman of the Center of Innovation at the University of North Dakota

Non-Executive Chairman of Young’s, a frozen foods company

Board of Harvest, a food distribution company

Qualifications

Mr. Morrison is a seasoned executive with strong consumer marketing, sales and international credentials and his knowledge of our customer base is very valuable to our Board. His experience in private equity and mergers and acquisitions is also an important asset for our Board.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  13


 PROPOSAL1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

Stephen Williamson

LOGO

Director Since:

2017

Committees:

• Audit

Age:51

Business Experience

Mr. MorrisonWilliamson currently serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Thermo Fisher Scientific, a leader in life sciences and healthcare technologies. Appointed to this role in August 2015, Mr. Williamson is currently Non-Executive Chairmanresponsible for the company’s finance, tax, treasury and investor relations functions.

He joined Thermo Fisher in 2001 as Vice President, European Financial Operations, based in the U.K., and oversaw its integration activities across Europe. In 2004, Mr. Williamson moved to the U.S. and held finance leadership roles for many of Thermo Fisher’s operating businesses. In 2008, he became Vice President of Financial Operations for the company and led the finance function supporting all businesses.

Prior to Thermo Fisher, Mr. Williamson served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Asia Pacific for Honeywell International (formerly AlliedSignal) in Singapore and held other finance roles in corporate development and operational finance. He began his career with Price Waterhouse in the transaction support group and the audit practice, working in both London and New York.

Additional Accomplishments and Memberships

•  Member of the CenterInstitute of Innovation at the UniversityChartered Accountants of North Dakota, the Non-Executive Chairman of Findus Group, a frozen foods company,England and a director of Hale and Hearty, a restaurant business, and InterContinental Hotels Group,Wales

Qualifications

Mr. Williamson is an accomplished finance leader with extensive international hotel company,senior management experience and he previously servedbrings a deep understanding of the power of innovation and R&D as a directorwell as the value of Trane, Inc.

M&A — core components of IFF’s strategy. His deep understanding of complex, global businesses, 20 years of M&A experience and extensive financial insight adds considerable guidance to our Board and Audit Committee.

14IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT



10

LOGO

TableCode of Contents

III. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to all of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and our Chief Accounting Officer. We also have adopted a Code of Conduct for Directors and a Code of Conduct for Executive Officers (together with the Code of Ethics, the “Codes”). The Codes are available through the Investor—Leadership & Governance—Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.

Only the Board or the Audit Committee may grant a waiver from any provision of our Codes in favor of a director or executive officer, and any such waiver and any amendments to the Codes will be publicly disclosed on our website, www.iff.com.

Shareholder Engagement

We regularly engage with our shareholders to better understand their perspectives on our Company, including our strategies, performance, matters of corporate governance and executive compensation. This dialogue has helped inform the Board’s decision-making and ensure our interests remain well-aligned with those of our shareholders. During 2017, we interacted with our largest active shareholders, representing approximatelytwo-thirds of our outstanding shares. We believe that all of these engagements provide valuable feedback and this feedback is shared regularly with our Board and its relevant committees. As a result of the feedback we received from our shareholders in the past few years, we have, among other things, raised our annual dividend, executed our share repurchase program, pursued value-creating acquisitions, completed a perception study on capital allocation preferences, and increased our investor relations exposure with enhanced marketing in key markets in the United States and across continental Europe.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the management of our Company.

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which set forth our governance principles relating to, among other things:

director independence;

director qualifications and responsibilities;

board and committee structure and meetings;

management succession; and

the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)CEO evaluation and succession process.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a person that has served for twelve consecutive, full annual terms on our Board cannot continue to serve as a director following the twelfth year of service, unless (i) unless:

such person is one of our employeesemployees; or (ii)

our Board has made a determination that the nomination of such person would be in the best interests of our Company and our shareholders.

A director’s first full annual term begins on the date he or she is first elected at an annual meeting of shareholders and continues until the next annual meeting of shareholders. Unless a director is an employee of our Company, prior to the conclusion of the twelfth full annual term, the director shall submit his or her resignation as a director effective immediately prior to that year’s annual meeting of shareholders.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  15

Corporate Governance


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines annually, and recommends changes to the Board as appropriate. A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is available through the Investor - Investor—Leadership & Governance - Governance—Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.

www.iff.com.

Sustainability Initiatives

Sustainability is an important part of how we do business. We have developed a sustainability strategy that is underpinned by the concept of a circular economy and guided by our vision to lead positive transformational changes toward a regenerative, healthy and abundant world. We aim to implement these principles in the way we design and manufacture our products, and in the way we treat our employees as well as the communities in which we operate.

In 2017, IFF was named by CDP to the Climate “A” list for the third consecutive year as a reflection of our leadership in carbon management. CDP also awarded IFF leadership status for our water management strategy. Additional achievements in 2017 included:

the industry’s first GreenCircle Certified Zero Waste to Landfill designation, at our South Brunswick, New Jersey manufacturing facility;

member of WBCSD’s Food Reform for Sustainability and Health (FReSH) initiative; and

Shubh Mint, a unique partnership with Mars Wrigley Confectionery to advance mint plant science and support mint farmers and their communities.

From the raw materials we source responsibly, to oureco-efficient manufacturing facilities and carefully designed products, we will continue our efforts to make a positive difference in the world.

Independence of Directors

The Board has affirmatively determined that each of our current directors (other than Mr. Fibig, our CEO) meets our independence requirements and those of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board undertakes an annual review of director independence, which includes a review of each director’s responses to questionnaires asking about any relationships with us.the Company. This review is designed to identify and evaluate any transactions or relationships between a director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company or members of our senior management.

The Board has affirmatively determined that each of our current directors (other than Mr. Fibig, our CEO) meets our independence requirements and those of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards:

Independent Directors

Marcello V. BottoliChristina Gold
Dr. Linda BuckHenry W. Howell, Jr.
Michael L. DuckerKatherine M. Hudson
David R. EpsteinDale F. Morrison
John F. FerraroStephen Williamson

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

16IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

In the ordinary course of business, transactions may occur between the Company or members of our senior management and entities with which some of our directors are or have been affiliated. During 2015,2017, in connection with its evaluation of director independence, our Board reviewed transactions between the Company and any company that has any ofwhere our directors or their family members of our directors servingserve as executive officers. Specifically, (i) in the ordinary course of business, we utilize the services of FedEx Freight, of which Mr. Ducker serves as President and Chief Executive Officer, of FedEx Freight, a shipping company that provides services to the Company. We reviewed this commercial relationship and found that all the transactions between the Company and FedEx were made(ii) in the ordinary course of business we purchase services from, and were negotiated at arm’s length. Assell products and services to Thermo Fisher Scientific, a result,life sciences and healthcare technology company, of which Mr. Williamson serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and (iii) one of our executive officers has purchased an immaterial interest in aco-investment vehicle managed by Mr. Bottoli. The Board determined that this commercial relationship did not impair Mr. Ducker’s independence.

Other Information
On August 5, 2008,none of these transactions impaired the SEC approved a settlement with Ernst & Young LLP and two of its partners, including Mr. Ferraro, relating to auditor independence issues arising out of business relationships between Ernst & Young LLP and an individual who was also a member of the board of directors of three of its audit clients. The matter arose out of actions taken by Mr. Ferraro in 2002 in his role as Vice Chairman of Ernst & Young LLP. Ernst & Young LLP and Mr. Ferraro resolved that matter by way of a negotiated settlement in which the respondents neither admitted nor denied the underlying allegations and accepted an administrative cease and desist order. The negotiated resolution did not involve any suspension, fines or other sanctions against Mr. Ferraro. Mr. Ferraro thereafter remained a partner in good standing at Ernst & Young through January 2015. Our Board of Directors took into consideration all factors regarding Mr. Ferraro’s character and experience and believes that he is a significant asset to the Board.

11

respective director.


Board Leadership Structure

As stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board does not have a policy that requires a separation of the Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”) and CEO positions. The Board believes that it is important to have the flexibility to make this determination from time to time based on the particular facts and circumstances then affecting our business.

Currently, we combine the positions of Chairman and CEO. We believe that the CEO, as the Company’s chief executive, is in the best position to fulfill the Chairman’s responsibilities, including those related to identifying emerging issues facing our Company, and communicating essential information to the Board about our performance and strategies. We also believe that the combined role of Chairman and CEO provides us with a distinct leader and allows us to present a single, uniform voice to our customers, business partners, shareholders and employees. If at any point in time the Board feels that its current leadership structure may be better served by separating the roles of Chairman and CEO, it may then determine to separate these positions.

In order to mitigate potential disadvantages of a combined Chairman and CEO, the Board has created the position of Lead Director to facilitate and strengthen the Board’s independent oversight of our performance, strategy and succession planning and to promote effective governance standards. The independent directors of the Board elect a Lead Director from among the independent directors. Our current Lead Director is Mr. Morrison.

Duties of our Lead Director

Ø    Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman and CEO is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, and provides prompt feedback regarding those meetings to the Chairman and CEO;

Ø    Approves and provides suggestions for Board meeting agendas, with the involvement of the Chairman and CEO and input from other directors;

Ø    Serves as liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the independent directors;

Ø    Monitors significant issues occurring between Board meetings and assures Board involvement when appropriate; and

Ø    Ensures, in consultation with the Chairman and CEO, the adequate and timely exchange of information between the management team and the Board.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  17


The duties of our Lead Director include:
presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman and CEO is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, and providing prompt feedback regarding those meetings to the Chairman and CEO;
approving, and providing suggestions for, Board meeting agendas, with the involvement of the Chairman and CEO and input from other directors;
serving as the liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the independent directors;
monitoring significant issues occurring between Board meetings and assuring Board involvement when appropriate; and
ensuring, in consultation with the Chairman and CEO, the adequate and timely exchange of information between our management and the Board.

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Board Committees

Our Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee, each of which operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. Each Committee reviews its charter at least annually and recommends charter changes to the Board as appropriate. In December 2015,2017, each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee reviewed its charter, and amended it where appropriate. Each Committee charter provides that the Committee will annually review its performance.performance, and each Committee reviewed and discussed its performance in 2017. A current copy of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee charters is available through the Investor - Investor—Leadership & Governance - Governance—Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.


12


www.iff.com.

The table below provides the current and expected membership and chairperson for each of our Committees and identifies our current Lead Director.

NameAuditCompensation

Nominating and

Governance

Lead Director

Marcello V. Bottoli

X1
X1
   
Dr. Linda BuckX 
Michael L. Ducker

Dr. Linda Buck

  X   

Michael L. Ducker

David R. Epstein

X

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

LOGO

John F. Ferraro

LOGO

Christina Gold

LOGO

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

**

Katherine M. Hudson

Dale F. Morrison

Stephen Williamson

    
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.X (Chair)
John F. Ferraro
X (Chair elect)1
Christina GoldXX
Henry W. Howell, Jr.XX (Chair)
Katherine M. Hudson
X (Chair)1
X1
Dale F. MorrisonX
X1
XX

X

LOGO = Committee member

1Chair

* = Effective immediately followingas of the 20162018 Annual Meeting, if elected to our Board of Directors (i) Mr. BottoliHowell will become a member ofretire from the Audit Committee and rotate off the Compensation Committee, (ii) Mr. Ferraro will become Chair of the Audit Committee, (iii) Ms. Hudson will become a member of the Compensation Committee and rotate off the Audit Committee and (iv) Mr. Morrison will become a member of the Compensation Committee.

Board.

Board and Committee Meetings

Our Board held fivesix meetings during 2015.2017. The Audit Committee held seven meetings, the Compensation Committee held five meetings and the Nominating and Governance Committee held six meetings during 2015. Each of our2017. All incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the Board and CommitteesCommittee meetings on which he or she served during 2015.2017. All of our directors who were serving on the day of last year’s annual meeting of shareholders attended that meeting. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, unless there are mitigating circumstances, such as medical, family or business emergencies, Board members should endeavor to participate (either in person or by telephone) in all Board meetings and all Committee meetings of which the director is a member and to attend our annual meeting of shareholders. Ournon-employee directors, all of whom are currently independent, meet in executive session, without the presence of any corporate officer or member of management, in conjunction with regular meetings of the Board and Committees. During 2015, our non-employee directors met in executive session as part of every regularly scheduled Board and Committee meeting.

18IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Audit Committee
Responsibilities
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include overseeing and reviewing:
the financial reporting process and the integrity of our financial statements, capital structure and related financial information;
our internal control environment, systems and performance;
the audit process followed by our independent accountant and our internal auditors;
the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent accountant and our internal auditors;
our independent accountant's qualifications, performance and independence, and whether it should be rotated, considering the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent public accountant; and

13


the procedures for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Additional responsibilities include assisting the Board in overseeing and reviewing enterprise-wide risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks, in particular as they relate to financial risk, cybersecurity and information security risk generally.
Under procedures adopted by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves all audit and non-audit services performed by our independent accountant. The Audit Committee may, when it deems appropriate, delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Audit Committee members or subcommittees.
Independence and Financial Expertise
The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the current Audit Committee members and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Audit Committee:
meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards;
meets the enhanced independence standards for audit committee members required by the SEC;
is financially literate, knowledgeable and qualified to review financial statements; and
qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.
Compensation Committee
Responsibilities
The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include:
determining, subject to approval by the independent directors of the Board, the CEO’s compensation;
reviewing and making determinations regarding compensation of executive officers (other than the CEO) and other members of senior management;
reviewing, adopting and recommending to the Board, or shareholders as required, general compensation and benefits policies, plans and programs, and overseeing the administration of such policies, plans and programs;
reviewing and discussing with management each year the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in our annual proxy statement or annual report on Form 10-K;
recommending to the Board any changes to the compensation and benefits of non-employee directors; and
conducting a risk assessment of our overall compensation policies and practices.
Under its charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in ensuring that long-term and short-term compensation provide performance incentives to management, and that compensation plans are appropriate and competitive and reflect the goals and performance of management and our Company. As discussed in more detail in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee considers Company-wide performance against applicable annual and long-term performance goals pre-established by the Compensation Committee, taking into account economic and business conditions, and comparative compensation and benefit performance levels. If the Compensation Committee deems it appropriate, it may delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Compensation Committee members or subcommittees.

14


Independence
The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the Compensation Committee members and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Compensation Committee:
meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards;
is an “outside director” pursuant to the criteria established by the Internal Revenue Service; and
is a “non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Role of Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants or advisors to assist it in evaluating CEO, senior executive and non-employee director compensation. From time to time, management also retains its own outside compensation consultants. In connection with the approval of the 2015 compensation program, including individual targets, as in prior years, the Committee directly engaged W.T. Haigh & Company (“Haigh & Company”) as its independent compensation consultant. From late 2014 through August 2015, Haigh & Company’s work with the Committee included analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs, and the design of our 2015 SAIP. In addition, Haigh & Company provided the Committee with advice and recommendations regarding compensation provided to Ms. Cornell in connection with her hiring. In August 2015, the Compensation Committee directly engaged F.W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent consultant. In late 2015, FW Cook provided the Committee with advice and a review of director compensation. FW Cook will continue to work with the Committee to provide it with analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. Both Haigh & Company and FW Cook were engaged exclusively by the Committee on executive and director compensation matters and do not have other consulting arrangements with the Company. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of each of Haigh & Company and FW Cook and determined that no conflicts of interest were raised.
Role of Management
Our Compensation Committee relies on management for legal, tax, compliance, finance and human resource recommendations, and data and analysis for the design and administration of the compensation, benefits and perquisite programs for our senior executives. The Compensation Committee combines this information with the recommendations and information from its independent compensation consultant.
Our CEO, our Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”) and our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (“General Counsel”) generally attend Compensation Committee meetings. CEO performance and compensation are discussed by the Compensation Committee in executive session, with advice and participation from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant as requested by the Compensation Committee. Our CEO and CHRO, without the presence of any other members of senior management, actively participate in the compensation discussions of our senior executives, including making recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to the amount and form of compensation (other than their own).
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 2015 or at any other time an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

15


Nominating and Governance Committee
Responsibilities
The Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:
developing and reviewing criteria for the selection of directors, and making recommendations to the Board with respect thereto;
reviewing the suitability of directors for continued service, including in case of a resignation tendered by a director, and making recommendations to the Board with respect to their re-nomination or action to be taken with respect to the resignation;
identifying qualified individuals to serve on the Board, reviewing the qualifications of director candidates and recommending to the Board the nominees to be proposed by the Board for election as directors at the annual meeting of shareholders;
reviewing director candidates recommended by shareholders for election;
establishing and reviewing policies pertaining to roles, responsibilities, tenure and removal of directors;
overseeing CEO and senior management succession plans;
developing and reviewing the Board and Board committee evaluation process and overseeing the annual CEO evaluation process;
reviewing and recommending changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and monitoring corporate governance issues; and
reviewing and, if appropriate, approving transactions with related parties.
The Nominating and Governance Committee may, when it deems appropriate, delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Nominating and Governance Committee members or subcommittees.
Independence

Current Members:Responsibilities

John F. Ferraro (Chair)

Marcello V. Bottoli

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

Dale F. Morrison

Stephen Williamson

Meetings in 2017:  7

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include overseeing and reviewing:

•  the financial reporting process and the integrity of our financial statements, capital structure and related financial information;

•  our internal control environment, systems and performance;

•  the audit process followed by our independent accountant and our internal auditor;

•  the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent accountant and our internal auditor;

•  our independent accountant’s and internal auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence, and whether our independent accountant and internal auditor should be rotated, considering the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent accountant or internal auditor;

•  the procedures for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics;

•  assisting the Board in overseeing and reviewing with management financial risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks;

•  establishing, monitoring and reviewing procedures for the treatment of concerns regarding compliance, accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters; and

•  reviewing andpre-approving all audit andnon-audit services performed by our independent accountant.

Delegation.Under its charter, the Audit Committee may, when it deems appropriate, delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Audit Committee members or subcommittees.

Independence and Financial Expertise

The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the current Audit Committee members and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Audit Committee:

•  meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards;

•  meets the enhanced independence standards for audit committee members required by the SEC;

•  is financially literate, knowledgeable and qualified to review financial statements; and

•  qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the SEC rules.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  19


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Compensation Committee

Current Members:Responsibilities

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. (Chair)

Michael Ducker

Christina Gold

Katherine M. Hudson

Dale F. Morrison

Meetings in 2017:  5

The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include:

•  determining, subject to approval by the independent directors of the Board, the CEO’s compensation;

•  reviewing and making determinations regarding compensation of executive officers (other than the CEO) and certain other members of senior management;

•  reviewing, adopting and recommending to the Board, or shareholders as required, general compensation and benefits policies, plans and programs, and overseeing the administration of such policies, plans and programs;

•  reviewing and discussing with management each year the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in our annual proxy statement;

•  recommending to the Board any changes to the compensation and benefits ofnon-employee directors;

•  conducting a risk assessment of our overall compensation policies and practices; and

•  reviewing succession planning for executive officers (other than the CEO) and certain members of senior management.

Authority and Delegation.  Under its charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in ensuring that long-term and short-term compensation provide performance incentives to management, and that compensation plans are appropriate and competitive and reflect the goals and performance of management and our Company. As discussed in more detail in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee considers Company-wide performance against applicable annual and long-term performance goalspre-established by the Compensation Committee, taking into account economic and business conditions, and comparative compensation and benefit performance levels. If the Compensation Committee deems it appropriate, it may delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Compensation Committee members or subcommittees.

Independence

The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the Compensation Committee members and, based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Compensation Committee:

•  meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards;

•  is an “outside director” pursuant to the criteria established by the Internal Revenue Service; and

•  is a“non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

20IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Role of Compensation Consultant.  The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants or advisors to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities, including evaluating CEO, executive andnon-employee director compensation, and in fulfilling its other responsibilities. From time to time, management also retains its own outside compensation consultants. In 2017, the Committee directly engaged FW Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent compensation consultant. FW Cook’s work with the Committee included analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. In addition, in 2017, FW Cook conducted a review of our current peer group to ensure that it continues to serve as an appropriate benchmark for executive andnon-employee director compensation levels and practices. FW Cook also reviewed our executive pay for performance, our aggregate long-term incentive practices, and provided updates on executive compensation trends and developments. FW Cook will continue to work with the Committee to provide it with analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. FW Cook was engaged exclusively by the Committee on executive and director compensation matters and does not have any other consulting arrangements with the Company. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of FW Cook and determined that no conflicts of interest exist.
Role of Management.  Our Compensation Committee relies on management for legal, tax, compliance, finance and human resource recommendations, and data and analysis for the design and administration of the compensation, benefits and perquisite programs for our executives. The Compensation Committee combines this information with the recommendations and information from its independent compensation consultant.
Our CEO, our Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”) and our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (“General Counsel”) generally attend Compensation Committee meetings. CEO performance and compensation are discussed by the Compensation Committee in executive session, with advice and participation from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant as requested by the Compensation Committee. Our CEO and CHRO, without the presence of any other members of senior management, actively participate in the compensation discussions of our executives, including making recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to the amount and form of compensation (other than their own).
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.  None of the members of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 2017 or at any other time an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  21


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Nominating and Governance Committee

Current Members:Responsibilities

Christina Gold

(Chair)

Linda Buck

David R. Epstein

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

Dale F. Morrison

Meetings in 2017:  6

The Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:

•  developing and reviewing criteria for the selection of directors, and making recommendations to the Board with respect thereto;

•  identifying qualified individuals to serve on the Board, reviewing the qualifications of director candidates and recommending to the Board the nominees to be proposed by the Board for election as directors at the annual meeting of shareholders;

•  reviewing the suitability of directors for continued service, including in case of a resignation tendered by a director following a change in employment or anticipated board memberships, and making recommendations to the Board with respect to their continued service;

•  reviewing director candidates recommended by shareholders for election;

•  establishing and reviewing policies pertaining to roles, responsibilities, tenure and removal of directors;

•  overseeing CEO succession planning;

•  developing and reviewing the Board and Board committee evaluation process;

•  overseeing the annual CEO evaluation process and recommend to the Board the annual performance goals for the CEO;

•  reviewing and recommending changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and monitoring corporate governance issues; and

•  reviewing and, if appropriate, approving transactions with related parties.

Delegation.  The Nominating and Governance Committee may, when it deems appropriate, delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Nominating and Governance Committee members or subcommittees.

Independence

The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the Nominating and Governance Committee members, and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards.

22IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Board and Committee Assessment Process

Each year, the Nominating & Governance Committee leads an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board and each of its committees. Each member of the Board and each member of the Board committees responds to an anonymous survey regarding the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and their leadership, and the dynamics between the Board and management. The Board supplements this process through the use ofin-person director interviews every other year during which the Lead Director and the Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee interviews each director to obtain his or her assessment of the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. After consulting with each other, the Lead Director and Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee summarize and review the results with the Board and each Board committee.

Succession Planning

Our Board recognizes that one of its most important duties is to ensure excellence and continuity in our senior leadership by overseeing the development of executive talent and planning for the effective succession of our Chairman and CEO and other senior members of executive management. As part of this process, our CEO and our executive officers are required to prepare a detailed development and succession plan for themselves and for their direct reports on an annual basis. The Company’s executives regularly attend Board meetings and maintain an ongoing dialogue with Board members, which is critical to the Company’s succession planning. The Compensation Committee reviews, on an annual basis, potential successors for the Company’s executive officers and such other senior management employees as the Compensation Committee may determine. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee members, and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards.

Director Candidates
Our Nominating and Governance Committee has established a policy regarding the consideration of director candidates. The Nominating and Governance Committee, together with other Board members, from time to time, as appropriate, identifies the need for new Board members. Proposed director candidates who satisfy the criteria described below and who otherwise qualify for membership on the Board are identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee. In identifying candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee seeks input and participation from other Board members and other appropriate sources so that all points of view are considered and the best possible candidates identified. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also engage a search firm to assist it in identifying potential candidates. Members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and other Board members, as appropriate, interview selected director candidates, evaluate the director candidates and determine which candidates are to be recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee to the Board. Our Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the suitability of potential candidates nominated by shareholders in the same manner as other candidates recommended to the Nominating and Governance Committee.

16


In addition, in December 2015, our Board adopted a “proxy access” by-law, which permits eligible shareholders to nominate candidates for election to our Board. Proxy access candidates will be included in the Company’s proxy statement and ballot. The proxy access bylaw provides that holders:
of at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding shares, which can comprise up to 20 shareholders,
holding the shares continuously for at least 3 years,
can nominate individuals constituting up to 20% of the Board for election at an annual shareholders meeting.
Board candidates are considered based on various criteria which may change over time and as the composition of the Board changes. At a minimum, our Nominating and Governance Committee considers the following factors as part of its review of all director candidates and in recommending potential director candidates:
judgment, character, expertise, skills and knowledge useful to the oversight of our business;
diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, experiences and other demographics;
business or other relevant experience; and
the extent to which the interplay of the candidate’s expertise, skills, knowledge and experience with that of other Board members will build a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to our needs and to the requirements and standards of the NYSE and the SEC.
Under our By-Laws, if a shareholder wishes to submit a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee, or wishes a director nomination to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for an annual meeting pursuant to our proxy access by-law, the shareholder must deliver or mail notice of the request to the Corporate Secretary of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., in writing, so that it is received not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders. However if the annual meeting is not within 30 days of the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting, such notice must be received by the Corporate Secretary no later than 10 days following the mailing of notice of the annual meeting or public disclosure of the annual meeting date, whichever occurs first. The notice must be accompanied by the information concerning the director candidate and nominating shareholder described in Article I, Section 3 and Section 4 of our By-Laws. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also request any additional background or other information from any director candidate or recommending shareholder as it may deem appropriate.
Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we have at least six but not more than fifteen directors. To ensure independence and to provide the breadth of needed expertise and diversity of our Board, the Board periodically reviews its size and makes appropriate adjustments pursuant to our By-Laws. While the Nominating and Governance Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy with regard to the selection of director nominees, diversity is one of the factors that the Nominating and Governance Committee considers in identifying director nominees. As part of this process, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates how a particular candidate would strengthen and increase the diversity of the Board in terms of how that candidate may contribute to the Board’s overall balance of perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, experience, skill sets and expertise in substantive matters pertaining to our business. The Nominating and Governance Committee also annually reviews each current Board member’s suitability for continued service as a member of our Boardagrees upon and recommends to the Board whether such member should be re-nominated. In addition, each directora succession plan for our CEO, including in emergency situations. Our Board is requiredcommitted to promptly tender hisbeing prepared for a planned or her resignation to the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee if, during his or her tenure as a director, such director (i) has a materialunplanned change in employment, or (ii) a significant changeour leadership in personal circumstances, which may adversely affect his or her reputation, or the reputation of the Company, or (iii) intendsorder to join the board of another for-profit company, so that the Nominating and Governance Committee can review the change and make a recommendation to the full Board regarding the director’s continued service. Such resignation becomes effective only upon acceptance by the Board.

17

ensure our stability.


Risk Management Oversight

Board Role in Overseeing Risk

Our Board is actively involved in the oversight of risks that could affect our Company. This oversight is conducted primarily through the AuditCompany and Compensation Committees of the Board, but the full Board has retained responsibility for the general oversight of risks. The Board is responsible for overseeing and reviewing with management the Company’s enterprise-wide risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks. It is the responsibility of the CEO and other senior management to manage the Company’sday-to-day business risks and its risk management process. We believe this division of responsibility is the most effective approach for addressing risk management.

Management maintains an enterprise risk management (“ERM”) processprogram which is designed to identify and assess our global risks and to develop steps to mitigate and manage risks. As part of its risk management practices, the Company has established a management risk committee made up of key members of the Company’s management to integrate global risk activities (including cybersecurity, compliance, business and crisis management) and to ensure appropriate prioritization of resources and alignment across the Company. The Board receives regular reports on the ERM process. The Boardprocess and the Audit Committee focusCompany’s risk mitigation activities. The full Board focuses on the most significant risks facing us, including operational risk, financial risk, regulatory risk, litigation risk, cybersecurity and information security risk, tax risk, credit risk, and liquidity risk, as well as our general risk management strategy, and how these risks are being managed. The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for assisting the Board in its responsibility to oversee and review with management our enterprise-widefinancial risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks, in particular as they relate to financial risk, cybersecurity and information security risk.also oversees and reviews procedures for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Compensation Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the management of risks associated with compensation policies and practice, our compensation plans (including equity compensation plans and programs), severance, change in control and other employment-related matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee monitors the Company’s governance risk and CEO succession risk.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  23


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Compensation Risks

In the fourth quarter of 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee, working with its independent compensation consultant, conducted a risk assessment of our executive compensation programs. The goal of this assessment was to determine whether the general structure of our executive compensation policies and programs, annual and long-term performance goals or the administration of the programs posed any material risks to our Company. In addition, with the input of our CHRO, the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation programs and policies below the executive level in a Company-wide risk assessment. The Compensation Committee shared the results of this review with our full Board.

The Compensation Committee determined, based on the reviews of its independent compensation consultant and management’s input and other factors, that the compensation policies and practices for the Company’s employees in 2015,2017, including the established performance goals and incentive plan structures, did not result in excessive risk taking or the implementation of inappropriate business decisions or strategies by the Company’s senior executives or employees generally, and that there are no risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.


18


Related Person Transactions
and Other Information

Transactions with Related Persons

In 2015,2017, there were no transactions and there are no currently proposed transactions in excess of $120,000 in which the Company was or will be a participant and in which any director or executive officer of the Company, any known 5% or greater shareholder of the Company or any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest as defined in Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K.

Related Person Transactions Policy

In accordance with SEC rules, our Board has adopted a written policy for the review and the approval or ratification of related person transactions. This policy is available through the Investor-Leadership & Governance-Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.www.iff.com. Under the policy, a “related person” is specifically defined as an executive officer, a director, a director nominee, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of voting securities, an immediate family member of any of the foregoing, or a controlled entity, which is defined as an entity owned or controlled by any of the foregoing or in which any such person serves as an officer or partner, or together with all of the foregoing persons, owns 5% or more equity interests. The policy defines a “related person transaction” as a transaction or series of transactions involving a related person and the Company, excluding employment arrangements involving an executive officer or other senior officer or employee of the Company and director compensation arrangements. The policy requires that any such transaction be approved or ratified by the Nominating and Governance Committee. If accounting issues are involved in the transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consult with the Audit Committee if deemed appropriate.

Pursuant to the policy, a related person transaction will be approved or ratified only if the Nominating and Governance Committee determines that it is being entered into in good faith and on fair and reasonable terms which are in the best interest of our Company and our shareholders. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the following factors, to the extent relevant:

the related person’s relationship to the Company and interest in the transaction;

the material facts of the transaction;

the benefits to the Company;

24IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

the availability of alternate sources of comparable products or services and the terms of such alternative; and

an assessment as to whether the transaction is on terms comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally.

No related person may participate in the review of a transaction in which he or she may have an interest. In addition, except fornon-discretionary contributions made pursuant to our matching contributions program, a charitable contribution by our Company to an organization in which a related person is known to be an officer, director or trustee, is subject to approval by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

Code In 2017, there were no related person transactions presented under the policy.

Other Information

On August 5, 2008, the SEC approved a settlement with Ernst & Young LLP and two of Business Conductits partners, including Mr. Ferraro, relating to auditor independence issues arising out of business relationships between Ernst & Young LLP and Ethics

We have adoptedan individual who was also a Codemember of Business Conductthe board of directors of three of its audit clients. The matter arose out of actions taken by Mr. Ferraro in 2002 in his role as Vice Chairman of Ernst & Young LLP. Ernst & Young LLP and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”)Mr. Ferraro resolved that applies to all of our employees, including our CEO, our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and our Chief Accounting Officer (“CAO”). We also have adopted a Code of Conduct for Directors and a Code of Conduct for Executive Officers (together with the Code of Ethics, the “Codes”). The Codes are available through the Investor - Leadership & Governance - Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.
Only the Board or the Audit Committee may grant a waiver from any provision of our Codes in favormatter by way of a directornegotiated settlement in which the respondents neither admitted nor denied the underlying allegations and accepted an administrative cease and desist order. The negotiated resolution did not involve any suspension, fines or executive officer,other sanctions against Mr. Ferraro. Mr. Ferraro thereafter remained a partner in good standing at Ernst & Young LLP until he retired in January 2015. Our Board took into consideration all factors regarding Mr. Ferraro’s character and any such waiverexperience and any amendmentsbelieves that he is a significant asset to the Codes will be publicly disclosed on our website, Board.

www.iff.com.


19


Share Retention Policy

We encourage our executives and directors to own our common stock so that they share the same long-term investment risk as our shareholders.

Our Share Retention Policy provides executives and directors flexibility in personal financial planning, yet requires them to maintain ongoing and substantial investment in our common stock.

Under our Share Retention Policy, each executive and director must retain shares of Company common stock based onat a targeted ownership level. There is no deadline by which an executive or director must meet his or her targeted ownership level. The targeted ownership level for directors is five times the cash portion of the annual retainer (not including any retainer for service as a committee chairperson or lead director). The targeted ownership levels for executives are (1) are:

the lesser of shares equal in value to five times base salary or 120,000 shares for our CEO, (2)

the lesser of shares equal in value to three times base salary or 35,000 shares for our CFO and Group Presidents, and (3)

the lesser of shares equal in value to two times base salary or 20,000 shares for other executives, including our General Counsel and Mr. O'Leary.Counsel.

If an executive or director does not meet the targeted ownership level, the executive or director may not sell or transfer any shares held in an equity, a deferred compensation or a retirement plan account managedprovided by us,the Company, and the executive or director must retain such shares in such accounts until the targeted ownership level is met. For executives, until theif their retention requirement is not met, the executive must alsois required to retain a portion (50%, in the case of our named executive officers) of any shares of common stock acquired from the exerciseas a result of a stock option orexercising any stock settled appreciation right (“SSAR”) or as a result of the vesting of restricted stock or a restricted stock unit (“RSU”) (after payment of any exercise price and taxes).

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  25


Our Share Retention Policy provides executives and directors flexibility in personal financial planning, yet requires them to maintain ongoing and substantial investment in our common stock.

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

As of March 8, 2016,7, 2018, all of our named executive officers and directors were in compliance with their individual retention requirements.our Share Retention Policy. Additional detail regarding ownership of our common stock by our executivesexecutive officers and directors is included in this proxy statement under the heading “Securities Ownership of Management, Directors and Certain Other Persons.”

Equity Grant Policy

The Compensation Committee has adopted an equity grant policyEquity Grant Policy with respect to the issuance of equity awards under our equity plans. Under the equity grant policy,Equity Grant Policy, the Compensation Committee approves all equity awards to our executives exceptother than our CEO, and our Board approves all equity awards to our CEO and to ournon-employee directors, which are approved by our Board. directors. The grant date for annual awards to all employees and for annual awards to ournon-employee directors is the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders. The grant date for LTIPawards under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) is the date that the Compensation Committee (or Board in the case of our CEO) approves the applicable LTIP metrics. In addition to the annual grants, equity awards may be granted “off-cycle”“off-cycle” at other times during the year to new hires, employees receiving promotions, director appointments and in other special circumstances. The grant price of equity awards (other than LTIP awards) will beis the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of the grant or, if the grant date is not a business day, the closing price on the NYSE on the following business day. The grant price for LTIP awards will beis the20-day trailing average price of our common stock on the NYSE as of the first trading day of the applicable LTIP performance cycle.

Policy Regarding Derivatives, Short Sales, Hedging and Pledges

Under our insider trading policy, directors and executive officers,all employees, including our named executive officers, are prohibited from entering into transactions designed to hedge against economic risks associated with an investment in our common stock. These individuals may not trade in derivatives in our securities (such as put and call options), effect “short sales” of our common stock, or enter into monetization transactions or similar arrangements (such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars or exchange funds) relating to our securities. These individuals are also prohibited from holding shares of our common stock in margin accounts or pledging shares of our common stock as collateral for a loan.

26IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


LOGO



20


IV. DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION
Director Compensation Program

Annual Director Cash and Equity Compensation

In 2015,

Under ournon-employee director compensation program, for the service year from the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2017 Annual Meeting”) to the 2018 Annual Meeting, eachnon-employee director received an annual retainer of $225,000 (or a prorated portion for a partial year$235,000, of service) relating to the service year from the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2015 Annual Meeting”) to the 2016 Annual Meeting. Of this amount,which $112,500 was paid in cash in November 2015, and $112,500$122,500 was paid in RSUs issued under our 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (“2015 SAIP”) on the date of the 20152017 Annual Meeting. These RSUs vest at least one year from the grant date and are subject to accelerated vesting upon a change in control. The 952882 RSUs granted to each director on the date of the 20152017 Annual Meeting was calculated using the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date. Any director who is an employee of our Company does not receive any additional compensation for his or her service as a director.

Annual Committee Chair and

Compensation for our Lead Director Compensation

During 2015,and Committee Chairs

For the service year from the 2017 Annual Meeting to the 2018 Annual Meeting, the Lead Director received an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000, the Chair of each of the Audit Committee andreceived an additional annual cash retainer of $17,500, the Chair of the Compensation Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 and the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000.

$12,500.

Participation in our Deferred Compensation Plan

Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”). Anon- employee director may defer all or a portion of his or her cash compensation as well as any RSUs granted to him or her, subject to tax law requirements. Additional details regarding our DCP may be found in this proxy statement under the heading “Executive Compensation - Compensation—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”Non-employee directors are not entitled to matching contributions or the 25% premium on deferrals into our common stock fund that are applicable to employees under the DCP.

Other

Additional Benefits

We reimburse ournon-employee directors for travel and lodging expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and Committee meetings, our shareholder meetings and other Company-related activities.

In addition, our current directors are eligible to participate in our Matching Gift Program. Under this program, we match, on a dollar for dollar basis, contributions made by directors to qualifying charitable organizations up to a maximum of $10,000 per person per year.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  27

Director’s Compensation


 DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION 

The following table details the compensation paid to or earned by ournon-employee directors for the year ended December  31, 2015.

20152017.

2017 Directors’ Compensation

Name (1) 
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash($)(2)
 
Stock
Awards
($)(3)(4)(5)
 
All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
 Total ($)
Marcello V. Bottoli 112,569 107,081 5,000 224,650
Dr. Linda Buck 112,500 107,081  219,581
J. Michael Cook (7)   10,000 10,000
Michael L. Ducker 112,500 107,081 10,000 229,581
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. 127,500 107,081  234,581
John F. Ferraro 112,500 107,081 10,000 229,581
Christina Gold 112,569 107,081 10,000 229,650
Alexandra A. Herzan (7)   10,000 10,000
Henry W. Howell, Jr. 122,500 107,081 10,000 239,581
Katherine M. Hudson 127,500 107,081 10,000 244,581
Arthur C. Martinez (7)   10,000 10,000
Dale F. Morrison 132,500 107,081 10,000 249,581


21


Name  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)(1)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)(4)  
  All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
   Total ($)     

Marcello V. Bottoli

  112,500   120,217   10,000    242,717 

Dr. Linda Buck

  112,500   120,217       232,717 

Michael L. Ducker

  112,500   120,217       232,717 

David R. Epstein

  112,500   120,217   10,000    242,717 

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

  127,500   120,217       247,717 

John F. Ferraro

  130,000   120,217   10,000    260,217 

Christina Gold

  129,178   120,217   10,000    259,395 

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

  112,500   120,217   10,000    242,717 

Katherine M. Hudson

  112,500   120,217   10,000    242,717 

Dale F. Morrison

  132,500   120,217   10,000    262,717 

Stephen Williamson (6)

  84,760   90,021       174,781 

(1)Mr. Epstein joined our Board in 2016 and is not included in the table above, as he received no director compensation for 2015.
(2)The amounts in this column include (i) the annual cash retainer for service as anon-employee director, (ii) for certain directors, the annual cash retainer for service as Lead Director or as chairperson of a Board committee during 2015,2017, and (iii) nominal amounts of cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of common stock. Of the amounts in this column, the following amounts were deferred in 20152017 under our DCP: Dr. Buck - $112,500; Mr. Ducker - $112,500; Mr. Epstein - $112,500; Mr. Ferguson - $127,500; Mr. Ferraro - $112,500; Mr. Howell - $122,500;$130,000; Ms. Hudson - $127,500; and$112,500; Mr. Morrison - $132,500.$132,500 and Mr. Williamson - $84,760. Earnings in our DCP were not above-market or preferential and thus are not reported in this table.

(3)(2)The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2017, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Details on and assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of RSUs and options may be found in Note 12 to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20152017 included in our Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2016.February 27, 2018.

(4)(3)Each director received a grant on May 6, 20153, 2017 of 952882 RSUs under our 2015 SAIP, other than Messrs. Cook and Martinez and Ms. Herzan,SAIP. Mr. Williamson, who retired prior to last year's annual meeting.joined our Board during 2017, received a grant of 669 RSUs on August 1, 2017. None of our directors forfeited any RSUs or shares of deferred stock during 2015.2017.

(5)(4)As of December 31, 2015,2017, the following directors held the following number of unvested RSUs and shares of deferred common stock.stock indicated in the table below.

Director  RSUs   

Deferred  

Stock  

 

Marcello V. Bottoli

   882    16,727 

Dr. Linda Buck

   882    17,929 

Michael L. Ducker

   882    4,226 

David R. Epstein

   882    1,865 

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

   882    10,048 

John F. Ferraro

   882    1,927 

Christina Gold

   882    1,333 

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

   882    43,638 

Katherine M. Hudson

   882    18,581 

Dale F. Morrison

   882    14,624 

Stephen Williamson

   669    575 

28IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


Director RSUs         
Deferred
Stock        
 
Marcello V. Bottoli 2,247
 12,959
 
Dr. Linda Buck 2,247
 14,115
 
Michael L. Ducker 952
 2,213
 
Roger L. Ferguson, Jr. 2,247
 6,532
 
John Ferraro 952
 
 
Christina Gold 2,247
 
 
Henry W. Howell, Jr. 2,247
 39,881
 
Katherine M. Hudson 2,247
 14,743
 
Dale F. Morrison 2,247
 9,097
 

 DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION 

The deferred shares, which are held under the DCP, result from deferral of vested equity grants, voluntary deferral of retainer fees or the
crediting of additional share units as a result of reinvestment of dividend equivalents. Deferred shares will be settled by delivery of common stock upon the director’s separation from service on the Board, or as otherwise elected by the director. All of the deferred shares are included for each director in the Beneficial Ownership Table.

(6)(5)The amounts in this column are contributions made by us under our Matching Gift Program to eligible charitable organizations matching contributions of the director to those charitable organizations during 2015.2017.

(6)
(7)Each of Messrs. Cook and Martinez and Ms. Herzan retired fromMr. Williamson joined our Board in 2015 and therefore did not receive any cash retainer or equity compensation in 2015.August 2017.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  29


22

LOGO


V. SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT, DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN OTHER PERSONS
Beneficial Ownership Table
Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 8, 2016,7, 2018, by each current director, each director nominee, the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement and all current directors and executive officers as a group. To our knowledge, except as otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership includes sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) 
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
      Owned(2)(3)      
 
Percent of
      Class**      
     
Marcello V. Bottoli 17,451
(4)*
Dr. Linda Buck 16,362
(5)*
Anne Chwat 58,871
(6)*
Alison A. Cornell 3,103
(7)*
Michael L. Ducker 3,165
(8)*
David R. Epstein 
 *
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. 8,779
(9)*
John F. Ferraro 952
(10)*
Andreas Fibig 35,760
(11)*
Christina Gold 3,392
(12)*
Matthias Haeni 23,678
(13)*
Henry W. Howell, Jr. 42,128
(14)*
Katherine M. Hudson 19,490
(15)*
Nicolas Mirzayantz 78,144
(16)*
Dale F. Morrison 11,344
(17)*
Richard O’ Leary 19,900
(18)*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (19 persons) 437,563
(19)*
_____________________

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)

 

  

Shares of

Common Stock

Beneficially

Owned (2)(3)

 

   

Percent of    

Class**    

 

Marcello V. Bottoli

   19,854  (4)   *

Dr. Linda Buck

   18,811  (5)   *

Anne Chwat

   48,340  (6)   *

Michael L. Ducker

   5,108  (7)   *

David R. Epstein

   2,747  (8)   *

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

   10,930  (9)   *

John F. Ferraro

   2,809(10)   *

Andreas Fibig

   79,576(11)   *

Christina Gold

   5,250(12)   *

Matthias Haeni

   23,008(13)   *

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

   45,718(14)   *

Katherine M. Hudson

   21,963(15)   *

Nicolas Mirzayantz

   49,027(16)   *

Dale F. Morrison

   15,506(17)   *

Richard O’ Leary

   21,263(18)   *

Stephen Williamson

   575(19)   *

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (19 persons)

   392,783(20)   *

*Less than 1%.

**Based on 79,685,74778,912,323 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 8, 2016.7, 2018.

(1)Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each person named in the table is c/o International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 521 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019.

(2)This column includes (i) shares held by our executive officers in our 401(k) Retirement Investment Fund Plan and (ii) shares of Purchased Restricted Stock (“PRS”) held by our executive officers. Shares of PRS are subject to vesting and may be forfeited if the executive’sexecutive officer’s employment is terminated.

(3)In determining the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by each person, shares that may be acquired by such person within 60 days after March 8, 20167, 2018 are deemed outstanding for purposes of determining the total number of outstanding shares for such person and are not deemed outstanding for such purpose for all other shareholders. Certain stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP are premium stock equivalent units paid to executivesexecutive officers that are subject to vesting and may be forfeited if the executive’sexecutive officer’s employment is terminated. To our knowledge, except as otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership includes sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares.

(4)Includes (i) 2,2451,100 shares held indirectly by a trust for which Mr. Bottoli is the settlor/grantor and Mr. Bottoli and two immediate family members are the beneficiaries, (ii) 12,95916,727 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (iii) 2,247882 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016 that will be automatically deferred7, 2018 which Mr. Bottoli has elected to defer to our DCP.

30IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT

Securities Ownership


 SECURITIES OWNERSHIP 

(5)Represents (i) 14,11517,929 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 2,247882 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016 that will be automatically deferred7, 2018 which Ms. Buck elected to defer to our DCP.

23


(6)Includes (i) 7,5496,840 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 1,679 shares earned under the completed 2015-2017 LTIP cycle that will be issued within 60 days of March 7, 2018.

(7)Represents (i) 4,226 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 882 shares pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 7, 2018 which Mr. Ducker has elected to defer to our DCP.

(8)Represents (i) 1,865 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 882 shares pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 7, 2018 which Mr. Epstein has elected to defer to our DCP.

(9)Represents (i) 10,048 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 882 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 7, 2018 which Mr. Ferguson has elected to defer to our DCP.

(10)Represents (i) 1,927 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 882 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 7, 2018 which Mr. Ferraro has elected to defer to our DCP.

(11)Includes (i) 22,528 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP, (ii) 7,620 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 7, 2018 and (iii) 12,022 shares earned under the completed 2015-2017 LTIP cycle that will be issued within 60 days of March 7, 2018.

(12)Includes (i) 1,333 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 882 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 7, 2018.

(13)Includes 3,006 shares earned under the completed 2015-2017 LTIP cycle that will be issued within 60 days of March 7, 2018.

(14)Includes (i) 43,081 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 882 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 7, 2018.

(15)Includes (i) 18,581 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 882 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 7, 2018 which Ms. Hudson has elected to defer to our DCP.

(16)Includes (i) 2,212 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 3,006 shares earned under the completed 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle that have not yet been issued.will be issued within 60 days of March 7, 2018.

(7)(17)Includes 495 shares earned under the completed 2013-2015 LTIP cycle that have not yet been issued.
(8)Represents (i) 2,21314,624 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 952882 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016 that will be automatically deferred7, 2018 which Mr. Morrison has elected to defer to our DCP.

(18)
(9)RepresentsIncludes (i) 6,5322,601 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 2,2471,176 shares issuable pursuant to RSUsearned under the completed 2015-2017 LTIP cycle that vestwill be issued within 60 days afterof March 8, 2016 that will be automatically deferred to7, 2018.

(19)Includes 575 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP.

(10)Represents 952 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016 that will be automatically deferred to our DCP.
(11)(20)Includes an aggregate of (i) 4,602165,097 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP, (ii) 1,29516,440 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, 20167, 2018, and (iii) 6,11423,248 shares earned under the completed 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle that have not yet been issued.
(12)Includes 2,247 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vestbe issued within 60 days after March 8, 2016, of which 952 shares will be automatically deferred to our DCP.7, 2018.
(13)Includes (i) 1,922 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016 and (ii) 1,822 shares earned under the completed 2013-2015 LTIP cycle that have not yet been issued.
(14)Represents (i) 39,881 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 2,247 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016 that will be automatically deferred to our DCP.
(15)Includes (i) 14,743 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 2,247 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016 that will be automatically deferred to our DCP.
(16)Includes (i) 1,543 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 4,851 shares earned under the completed 2013-2015 LTIP cycle that have not yet been issued.
(17)Represents (i) 9,097 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 2,247 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016 that will be automatically deferred to our DCP.
(18)Includes (i) 1,144 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 1,570 shares earned under the completed 2013-2015 LTIP cycle that have not yet been issued.
(19)Includes an aggregate of (i) 114,621 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP, (ii) 21,821 shares issuable pursuant to restricted stock units that vest within 60 days after March 8, 2016, and (iii) 24,197 shares earned under the completed 2013-2015 LTIP cycle that have not yet been issued.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  31


24

 SECURITIES OWNERSHIP 


Certain Other Owners
5% Shareholders

The following table sets forth information regarding each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, as of March 8, 2016,7, 2018, based on a review of filings with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 
Number of Shares and
Nature of Beneficial Ownership
 
Percent
of Class*
     
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
 4,655,216
(1)5.8%
Capital Research Global Investors
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
 6,225,302
(2)7.8%
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
 7,467,990
(3)9.4%

              Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

  

Number of Shares

and

Nature of Beneficial

Ownership

 

   

Percent

of Class*

 

 

Winder Investment Pte Ltd

#03-00 8 Robinson Road, ASO Building

Singapore 048544

 

   10,420,193(1)    13.2

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

 

   8,968,346(2)    11.4

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

   5,289,706(3)    6.7

*Based on 79,685,74778,912,323 shares of common stock outstanding.outstanding as of March 7, 2018.

(1)This amount is based solely on Amendment No. 6 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 2016 by BlackRock, Inc. Of these shares, BlackRock has the sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 3,969,533 of these shares and sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 4,655,216 of these shares.
(2)This amount is based solely on Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 16, 201614, 2018 by Capital Research Global Investors, a division of Capital Research and Management Company (“Capital Research”). Capital ResearchWinder Investment Pte Ltd. Winder Investment has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of these shares.

(3)(2)This amount is based solely on Amendment No. 59 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 20169, 2018 by The Vanguard Group. Of these shares, The Vanguard Group has the (i) sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 149,808113,056 of these shares, (ii) shared power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 7,70016,763 of these shares, (iii) the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 7,308,5188,840,684 of these shares, and (iv) shared power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 159,472127,662 of these shares.

(3)This amount is based solely on Amendment No. 8 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 8, 2018 by BlackRock, Inc. Of these shares, BlackRock has the (i) sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 4,544,791 of these shares and (ii) sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 5,289,706 of these shares.

32IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


LOGO

VI. PROPOSAL II — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Selection of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of our Board is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. To execute this responsibility, the Audit Committee engages in a comprehensive annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence to determine whether the independent registered public accounting firm should be rotated, and considers the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016,2018, and our Board has directed that our management submit that selection for ratification by our shareholders at the 20162018 Annual Meeting. PwC has been retained as our external auditor continuously since 1957. In connection with the selection of PwC, the Audit Committee annually reviews and negotiates the terms of the engagement letter entered into with PwC. This letter sets forth important terms regarding the scope of the engagement, associated fees, payment terms, responsibilities of each party and the election of the parties to be subject to binding arbitration in the case of any dispute.

In accordance with SEC rules and PwC policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide audit service to our Company. For lead and quality review audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years. The process for selection of our lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the Chair of the Audit Committee and the candidate for the role, as well as discussion by the full Audit Committee and management.


25


The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders, and we are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.2018. Although ratification is not required by ourBy-Laws or otherwise, we are submitting the selection of PwC to our shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders'shareholders’ views on our Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. The Audit Committee will consider the outcome of our shareholders’ vote in connection with the Audit Committee’s selection of our independent registered public accounting firm in the next fiscal year, but is not bound by the shareholders’ vote. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that a change would be in the best interests of our Company and our shareholders.

Representatives of PwC are expected to attend the 20162018 Annual Meeting, where they will be available to respond to questions and, if they desire, to make a statement.

Our Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  33

Proposal 2 – Ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2016.


 PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table provides detail about fees for professional services rendered by PwC for the years ended December 31, 20152017 and December 31, 2014.

 2015 2014
Audit Fees (1)$4,674,019
 $4,733,219
Audit-Related Fees (2)$60,006
 $610,004
Tax Fees (3)   
Tax Compliance$554,447
 $1,148,853
Other Tax Services$90,786
 $82,127
All Other Fees (4)$67,849
 $63,799
Total$5,447,107
 $6,638,002
________________________
2016.

    

 

2017

 

  

 

2016

 

 

Audit Fees (1)

 

  $

 

6,501,799

 

 

 

 $

 

5,269,019 

 

 

 

Audit-Related Fees (2)

 

  

 

$

 

 

69,140

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

133,035 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees (3)

 

    

Tax Compliance

 

  $

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

12,000 

 

 

 

 

Other Tax Services

 

  

 

$

 

 

391,107

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

500,000 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees (4)

 

  

 

$

 

 

9,015

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

11,781 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

  

 

$

 

 

    6,971,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

  5,925,835 

 

 

 

 

(1)Audit Fees were for professional services rendered for audits of our consolidated financial statements and statutory and subsidiary audits, consents and review of reports filed with the SEC and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. Audit Fees also included the fees associated with an annual audit of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes- OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, integrated with the audit of our annual financial statements.

(2)Audit-Related Fees were for due diligence.services related to review of certain governance, risk and compliance procedures and other local statutory requirements.

(3)Tax Compliance services consisted of fees related to the preparation of tax returns, assistance with tax audits and appeals, indirect taxes, expatriate tax compliance services and transfer pricing services. Other Tax Services consisted of tax planning and tax advisory services.

(4)All Other Fees were for software licenses and other professional services.

26


Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and PermittedNon-Audit Services

Consistent with requirements of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for (i) for:

appointing, (ii)

negotiating, and setting the compensation of, and (iii)

overseeing the performance of, the independent registered public accounting firm.

In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established policies and procedures topre-approve all audit andnon-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to our Company by category, including audit-related services, tax services and other permittednon-audit services. Under the policy, the Audit Committeepre-approves all services obtained from our independent registered public accounting firm by category of service, including a review of specific services to be performed, fees expected to be incurred within each category of service and the potential impact of such services on auditor independence. The term of anypre-approval is for the financial year, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period in thepre-approval.

34IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

If it becomes necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the originalpre-approval, the Audit Committee requires separate pre- approvalpre-approval before engaging the independent registered public accounting firm. To facilitate the process, the policy delegatespre-approval authority to the Audit Committee chairperson topre-approve services up to $20,000, and the Audit Committee may also delegate authority to one or more of its members topre-approve services. The Audit Committee member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes, only, anypre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

All services rendered by PwC to our Company are permissible under applicable laws and regulations. During 2015,2017, all services performed by PwC which were subject to the SEC’spre-approval requirements were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Audit Committee’spre-approval policy in effect during 2015.

2017.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee (“we,” “us” or the “Committee”) operates in accordance with a written charter, which was adopted by the Board of Directors.Board. A copy of that charter is available through the Investor - Investor—Leadership & Governance - Governance—Governance link on the Company’s website at www.iff.com. The Committee comprisesis composed of five directors whom the Board has determined are “independent,” as required by the applicable listing standards of the NYSE and the rules of the SEC, and each of whom qualify as an “audit committee financial expert”experts” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), is responsible for performing an integrated audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

The Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process and internal control structure on behalf of the Board of Directors.Board. We met seven times during 2015,2017, including meeting regularly with PwC and the Company’s internal auditor, both privately and with management present. For 2015,2017, we have reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management. We have reviewed and discussed with management its process for preparing its report on its assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and at regular intervals we received updates on the status of this process and actions taken by management to respond to issues and deficiencies identified. We discussed with PwC its audit of the financial statements and of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. We discussed with PwC and the Company’s internal auditorsauditor the overall scope and plans for their respective audits.

We have discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16,1301, Communications with Audit Committees. We also received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC as required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with PwC its independence. We concluded that PwC’s independence was not adversely affected by thenon-audit services provided by PwC, the majority of which consisted of audit-related and tax compliance services.


27


Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board (and the Board subsequently approved our recommendation) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 for filing2017 filed with the SEC.SEC on February 27, 2018.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  35


 PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

In determining whether to retain PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 20162018 fiscal year, we took into consideration a number of factors, including:

the quality and effectiveness of PwC’s historical and recent performance on the Company’s audit;

the length of PwC’s tenure as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and its familiarity with our business, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting;

PwC’s capability, understanding and expertise in handling the breadth and complexity of our global operations;

the appropriateness of PwC’s fees and payment terms; and

PwC’s independence.

Based on this evaluation, we believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to retain PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016,2018, which the shareholders will be asked to ratify at the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Audit Committee

John F. Ferraro (Chair)

Marcello V. Bottoli

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

Dale F. Morrison

Stephen Williamson

Audit Committee
Katherine M. Hudson (Chair)
David R. Epstein
John Ferraro
Henry W. Howell, Jr.
Dale F. Morrison

Ö

YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

RATIFICATION OF PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2018

36IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT



28

LOGO


VII. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
Reference Guide to our CD&A

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, is designed to provideor CD&A, describes and analyzes our shareholders with a clear understanding of ourexecutive compensation philosophy and objectives, compensation-setting processprogram in the context of the compensation paid during the last fiscal year to our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer and the 2015 compensationeach of our namedthree most highly compensated executive officers or NEOs. during 2017 (collectively referred to as our NEOs). This CD&A is organized as follows:

As discussed in Proposal III,3, we are conducting our annual Say on Pay vote that requests your approval of the compensation of our NEOs as described in this section and in the tables and accompanying narrative contained below under “Executive Compensation.” To assist you with this vote, please review our compensation philosophies, the design of our executive compensation programs and how, we believe, these programs have contributed to and are aligned with our performance.

Executive Summary

For 20152017 our NEOs were:

Name

Title

Andreas Fibig

  Chairman and CEO
Alison A. Cornell

     Richard O’Leary

  CFO

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  Group President, Fragrances

Matthias Haeni

  Group President, Flavors

Anne Chwat

  

General Counsel

Richard O’LearyFormer Interim CFO

Alison A. Cornell was appointed as our CFO, effective July 8, 2015, replacing Richard O’Leary who served as our interim CFO from December 2014 through July 2015. Upon the appointment of Ms. Cornell, Mr. O’Leary was named SVP, Controller

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  37

Compensation Discussion and Chief Accounting Officer.Analysis


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Compensation Philosophy

The core of our executive compensation philosophy is that our executives’ paycompensation should be linked to achievement of financial and operating performance metrics that build shareholder value. Consequently,value over both the short- and long-term. As such, we consistently focus on the following key drivers of shareholder value maximization:

LOGO

We designed our compensation program to motivatefocus on elements that we believe will contribute to these shareholder value drivers. Our compensation program:

LOGO

38IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT

Financial Results Acquisitions Dividends Share Repurchase Increase Shareholder Value Is Variable and rewardTied to Value Creating Performance Metrics Includes a Significant Equity Component Shareholder Value Reflects Each Executive’s Level of Responsibility Rewards Individual Performance and Contributions


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

The design of our executives for the achievement of both annual and long-term business goalsexecutive compensation program reflects our belief that are challenging yet attainable. A significant portion of compensation is variable and tied directly to Company and individual performance. We believe thatour executive compensation should (i) be tied to overall Company performance, (ii) reflect each executive’s level of responsibility, (iii) reflect individual performance and contributions and (iv) include a significant equity component. We believe that by keeping the majority of executive pay variable and equity-based we can best ensure alignment(1) aligned with shareholder value and Company growth.

Our Executive Compensation Program Rewards Executives for Achievements that Create Shareholder Value. During 2015, we continued to compensate our executive officers based on (i) the achievement of financial and operational metrics offor both theour company and the respective segmentbusiness function in which the executive serves which we believe creates shareholder value and (ii)(2) tied to the total shareholder return delivered to our shareholders. In addition, for 2015, we added an individual performance metric for a portion ofThe following illustrates how our Annual Incentive Program (“AIP”) to measure our executive officers’ achievement in the areas of leadership, succession planning and people development as we believe that the strength of our employees will be key to our ability to build differentiation and accelerate growth.
Compensation is Variable and Tied to Our Performance. Our target total direct compensation for 2015 reflects our commitment that a significant portion of our executive compensation should be variable and tied directly to achievement of our financial, operational and shareholder return objectives. During 2015, as in prior years, our executive officers’ direct compensation elements primarily consisted of (1) base salary, (2) AIP awards, (3) Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) awards and (4) Equity Choice Program (“ECP”) awards. For 2015, 76% on average of the target total direct compensation payable to Messrs. Fibig, Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat was variable, and the value of such variable compensation was tied directly to stock price performance or performance versus pre-defined annual and long-term performance metrics, with 71% of this performance-based compensation tied to long-term performance.

29


______
(1)Compensation for Mr. O’Leary is not included in the amounts reflected due to his status as interim CFO and the distinct nature of his compensation. Compensation for Ms. Cornell is included on an annualized basis.
Compensation Aligns Executives with Our Shareholders. We have designed our2017 executive compensation program to providemet these design objectives by tying a significant portion of our executives’ total direct compensation in the form of equity and to encourage both their direct investment in the Companyvariable and long-term ownership. For 2015, approximately 56% of the variable target compensation payable to Messrs. Fibig, Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat was payable in equity. The proportion of long-term incentive compensation opportunity provided in the form of equity versus cash under our LTIP and ECP for (i) Mr. Fibig and (ii) Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat, on average, for 2015, was as follows:
Target Long-Term Incentivegoals:

LOGO

LOGO

Our 2017 NEO Compensation

______
(1)Compensation for Mr. O’Leary is not included in the amounts reflected due to his status as interim CFO and the distinct nature of his compensation. Compensation for Ms. Cornell is included on an annualized basis.

30


Our 2015 NEO Pay Reflects Our Overall 20152017 Performance

During 2015,2017, we achieved currency neutral growth in all of our financial results were affected by softening of sales performance in certain markets, currency pressures, and operating expenses, offset by contributions from our recent acquisitions.key metrics. For the year, on a currency neutral basis, we achieved 5%9% sales growth, 8%5% adjusted operating profit growth, and 11%9% adjusted earnings per share growth, in each case within our long-term growth targets.growth. In addition, we delivered a three-year Total Shareholder Return at approximately the 80th70th percentile relative to the S&P 500. As a result of our financial and operational results, (1) our AIPAnnual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) achievement levels ranged fromwere approximately 42%110% for those executive officers evaluated at the corporate level, to 39%92% for our Group President, Fragrances and 41%123% for our Group President, Flavors and (2) our 20152015-2017 LTIP achievement level was approximately 117% of target.

2015 Annual Incentive Plan Targets and Payout. For 2015, our AIP was based on the achievement of (1) four financial performance metrics that management and the Board believe are significant indicators of our financial performance: (i) local currency sales growth, (ii) operating profit, (iii) gross margin and (iv) working capital and (2) individual objectives relating to leadership, succession planning and people development. Financial performance metrics are measured (A) at the consolidated corporate level for our CEO, CFO, interim CFO and General Counsel and (B) at both the consolidated corporate level and the business unit level for the Group Presidents of Fragrances and Flavors.
For 2015, at the corporate level, we achieved between threshold and target for three of the four financial performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the financial performance metrics. As a result, the overall corporate AIP payout was approximately 42%123% of target.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  39

CEO Target Opportunity Mix Fixed vs. Variable Variable Short–Term v. Long-Term Long Term Cash v. Equity NEO Average (excluding CEO) Target Opportunity Mix Fixed vs. Variable Variable Short-Term v. Long-Term Long-Term Cash v. Equity


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

In 2017, we refreshed our Vision 2020 strategy, which focuses on four pillars to drive differentiation, accelerate profitable growth, and increase shareholder value.

LOGO

Vision 2020 Refreshed Strategy

Innovating Firsts

Win Where We
Compete
Become Our
Customers’
Partner of
Choice
Strengthen and
Expand the
Portfolio

Ø Drive differentiation by leveraging existing expertise in key technologies and exploring prioritized innovation opportunity areas

Ø Develop responsible products to meet the future needs of our customers and consumers

ØLead in key markets

ØAchieve balanced growth in customer base

ØStrengthen our position with multinational customers

Ø Address the specialized needs of local and regional customers

Ø Actively support our customers’ success

Ø Achieve commercial excellence and service leadership

Ø Become a marketing powerhouse

Ø Maximize and expand our existing category mix to strengthen the Flavors and Fragrances core

Ø Stretch into adjacencies by leveraging current acquisitions, while exploring new opportunities

Ø Pursue partnerships and collaborations to drive new offerings and solutions

During 2017, we made significant progress on our Vision 2020 strategic objectives including:

Acquiring Fragrance Resources and PowderPure;

Continuing to grow sweetness and savory modulation portfolio sales by double-digits;

Growing encapsulation-related sales, led by Fabric Care and Personal Wash;

Launching TastepointSM to serve our dynamicmid-tier flavor customers;

Continuing strong growth in Cosmetic Active Ingredients;

Improving Middle East and Africa sales growth in both flavors and fragrances and expanding our Flavors site in Cairo to support growth in this key market;

Reaffirming our sustainability leadership with a CDP “A” climate list rating and EcoVadis “Gold” status; and

Joining FReSH, a project of the target award for our CEO, CFO, interim CFO and General Counsel, whom are evaluated solelyWorld Business Council on corporate performance for purposes of our AIP. Our Fragrance business unit achieved between threshold and target for three of the four financial performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the four performance metrics. This resultedSustainable Development, designed to accelerate transformational change in an AIP payout, when combined with the corporate level performance, of approximately 39% of the target award for our Group President, Fragrances. Our Flavors business unit performance exceeded target for one of the four financial performance metrics, was between threshold and target for two of the four performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the financial performance metrics. This resulted in an AIP payout, when combined with the corporate level performance, of approximately 43% of the target award for our Group President, Flavors.global food systems.

Long-Term Incentive Plan Results for 2015.40  Our LTIP is structuredIFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

During 2017, we paid $206 million in three-year cycles, which are administereddividends to our shareholders, increased our quarterly dividend by 8% to $0.69 per share in four equally-weighted performance segments: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 (each an “annual performance segment”)August 2017, and cumulative performance over the three-year period (the “cumulative performance segment”). During the three annual performance segments, Company performance is measured against two equally-weighted financial metrics, Economic Profit (“EP”)repurchased approximately 459,000 shares of common stock for $58 million. The total payout ratio (total cash returned to shareholders in dividend payments and relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”). Relative TSR is the sole financial metric for the cumulative performance segment for allshare repurchases compared to adjusted net income) was 56% of the current LTIP cycles.

For 2015,adjusted net income, consistent with our EP was $273 million, as adjusted for 2015 non-core items. As a result, our NEOs earned approximately 34%target range of the EP goal for the 2015 segment of its current LTIP cycles. Our TSR for 2015 was at the 80th percentile and generated a payout of approximately 200%50% to 60%. Our cumulative TSR for the 2013-2015 LTIP cycle was at the 74th percentile, and resulted in a 196% payout.
For additional details regarding the AIP and LTIP, including the threshold, target and maximum levels for each performance metric, please see the sections below titled “Direct

Compensation Components and 2015 Compensation Decisions “- Annual Incentive Plan” and “- Long Term Incentive Plan.”

Compensation-Related Corporate Governance

To ensure continued alignment of compensation with Company performance and the creation of shareholder value on a long term,long-term, sustainable basis, we maintain strong compensation-related corporate governance policies, including the following:

Our clawback policies for recovery of cash and equity compensation from executives apply to accounting restatements, financial restatements and misstatements (without regard to fault), an employee’s willful misconduct or violation of a Company policy that is materially detrimental to the Company, and an employee’s violation of non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality and similar covenants;
We require our executives, including our NEOs, to meet share retention guidelines to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders, as described above under “Share Retention Policy”;

31


We do not permit short-sales or hedging of our stock by our employees, officers or directors;
Our Executive Severance Policy (“ESP”) provides that all equity awards are subject to a “double trigger” and only accelerate in connection with a change in control if an ESP participant is terminated without cause or terminates for “good reason” within two years following a change in control; and
None of our NEOs are entitled to a tax gross-up for severance payments.
Compensation Setting Process
AnnualReview
Our Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) is responsible for overseeing the design, implementation and administration of short-term and long-term compensation (including equity awards, benefits and perquisites) for all executive officers and other members of senior management. The Committee recommends CEO compensation to the independent directors of the Board for their approval. In connection with the approval of the 2015 compensation program, including individual targets, as in prior years, the Committee engaged W.T. Haigh & Company (“Haigh & Company”) as its independent compensation consultant to assist the Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities. From late 2014 through August 2015, Haigh & Company’s work with the Committee included analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs, and the design of our 2015 SAIP. In addition, Haigh & Company provided the Committee with advice and recommendations regarding compensation provided to Ms. Cornell in connection with her hiring. In August 2015, the Compensation Committee directly engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent consultant. FW Cook works with the Committee to provide it with analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. Both Haigh & Company and FW Cook were engaged exclusively by the Committee on executive and director compensation matters and do not have other consulting arrangements with the Company. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of each of Haigh & Company and FW Cook and determined that no conflicts of interest were raised.
Our CEO and CHRO evaluate the individual performance and, with input from the Committee’s independent consultant, the competitive pay positioning for senior management members that report directly to the CEO, including our NEOs, and make recommendations to the Committee concerning each such executive’s target compensation. Our CEO follows the same process with regard to the target compensation for our CHRO, without her input, and the Committee follows the same process with regard to the target compensation for our CEO, without his input.
As part of its compensation setting process, the Committee also considers the results of the prior year’s shareholder advisory vote on our executive compensation. The Committee believes these voting results provide useful insight as to whether shareholders agree that the Committee is achieving its goal of designing and administering an executive compensation program that promotes the best interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing its executives with appropriate compensation and meaningful incentives to deliver strong financial performance and increase shareholder value. As part of its 2015 compensation setting process, the Committee reviewed the results of the 2014 shareholder advisory vote, in which 94.6% of the votes cast were voted in favor of our executive compensation program.
New Executive Officer Compensation
In May 2015, in connection with our hiring of Ms. Cornell as CFO, the Committee approved Ms. Cornell’s compensation package after consultation with the Committee’s compensation consultant. As part of establishing Ms. Cornell’s compensation package, the Committee reviewed the compensation package of the Company’s prior CFO and the median to 75th percentile of the relevant market benchmarks. The Committee approved offering Ms. Cornell a base salary of $560,000, an AIP target of 80%, and an ECP award of $500,000 (pro-rated for time she served as CFO during 2015). Consistent with the treatment of previous newly-hired senior executives, Ms. Cornell was also granted pro-rata participation in each of the current LTIP cycles, with a pro-rated LTIP target award for each of the current three-year performance cycles equal to $500,000. The Committee also approved a one-time sign-on cash bonus of $250,000. The Committee believed that the $250,000 cash bonus would facilitate Ms. Cornell selecting PRS for her pro-rated ECP award of $250,000, which requires a co-investment, and therefore further align her interests with those of the shareholders.

32


Concurrently with Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO, Mr. O’Leary, who had been serving as our Interim CFO, was appointed to serve as our Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. In this role, the Committee approved an increase to Mr. O’Leary’s on-going base salary to $400,000. In accordance with the terms of his agreement to serve as Interim CFO, during such service, Mr. O’Leary received an additional $15,000 per month in base salary, of which $7,500 was paid each month and $7,500 was deferred until three months following the appointment of Ms. Cornell. All other terms of Mr. O’Leary’s compensation remained unchanged.
Principles for Setting Compensation Targets
On an annual basis, the Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our NEOs. We use a global grading structure for our NEOs, with compensation ranges for each grade. Our NEOs are placed in a particular grade based on internal factors (including scope of responsibilities and job complexity) and an external market evaluation. The external market evaluation is based on published third party general survey information and a review of similar positions within our selected peer groups described below. This process is referred to as “market benchmarking.”
Market Benchmarking
The Committee reviews its external market benchmarking and peer group data annually. The Committee��s goals are to position (i) target total cash compensation at median or slightly above and (ii) target total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation) between the median to 75th percentile of relevant market benchmarks. In July 2014, the Committee reviewed peer group data with our independent compensation consultant for purposes of determining the appropriate peer group for setting 2015 compensation levels and opportunities.
2015 Benchmarking for the CEO, CFO and Group Presidents. For 2015 compensation decisions regarding (i) the CEO, (ii) the CFO (which was evaluated at the time of her appointment) and (iii) each of the Group Presidents, the Committee, based on recommendations from Haigh & Company, decided to benchmark compensation against the average of (1) its Select Peer Group of consumer products-based companies and (2) the General Industry Cut of the Towers Watson General Industry Index Survey.
The Committee annually reviews the Select Peer Group versus the criteria set forth below, taking into consideration its belief that short-term market and performance volatility should not affect the benefit of maintaining a level of consistency within the Select Peer Group:
policies.

1.U.S. publicly traded companies of comparable size with manufacturing operations (generally based on revenue of $1B - $7B and market capitalization of $1B - $14B);
2.Strong in-house R&D activities;
3.Global scope with significant international presence (international operations generally accounting for at least 25% of total revenues);
4.Growth orientation, with positive sales and earnings growth over the three years prior to the review and selection of the peer group;
5.Companies with which we compete for executive talent; and
6.Progressive companies with positive reputations.

33


For 2015, the Select Peer Group consisted of the following companies:
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.Hormel Foods Corporation
The Clorox CompanyJarden Corporation
Coty, Inc.McCormick & Company, Incorporated
Elizabeth Arden, Inc.Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
Energizer Holdings, Inc.Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.Revlon, Inc.
Herbalife Ltd.Sensient Technologies Corporation
The Hershey CompanyTupperware Brands Corporation
There were four companies in the Select Peer Group that did not meet all of the desired criteria-Elizabeth Arden, Estee Lauder, Hershey and Jarden. Each of Hershey, Jarden and Estee Lauder were slightly above either the revenue or market capitalization criteria, while Elizabeth Arden was slightly below the market capitalization criteria. The Committee decided to keep these companies in the Select Peer Group (i) based on the significant comparability of these businesses to one of our two business units and (ii) to allow for year-over-year consistency in the peer group.
At the time of the Committee’s determination of the Select Peer Group, we were positioned at approximately the 38th percentile of the Select Peer Group in terms of revenue, the primary scope comparison measure, for the respective fiscal year. Our current relative revenue positioning remains at approximately the 38th percentile of the Select Peer Group.
As discussed above, the Committee weighted the compensation data derived from the General Industry Cut of the Towers Watson Survey equally with the Select Peer Group data. The General Industry Cut comprises 230 companies having $1 billion to $7 billion in reported revenues, with median revenues of $2.9 billion. Energy and financial companies were excluded from this selection as the Committee believed that the industry business models and the pay practices of these two industries are less comparable to ours, particularly in a volatile economic climate.
In August 2015, the Committee reviewed its Select Peer Group with Haigh & Company for purposes of its upcoming 2016 compensation setting process and determined that for 2016 the only change was the deletion of Energizer Holdings, as a result of its split into two companies, and the addition of Edgewell Personal Care, which consists of the former personal care division of Energizer Products.
2015 Benchmarking for Other Executive Officers. Based on recommendations by its compensation consultant, the Committee determined that the Select Peer Group did not provide sufficient comparative data for the other executive officer positions that were reviewed by the Committee. Consequently, for all other executive officer positions, including the General Counsel, instead of using the Select Peer Group, the Committee used the aggregate data available from a select cut of the Towers Watson General Industry Index that (i) identified themselves as belonging to the consumer products or the food and beverage industry and (ii) had revenues between $1 billion and $7 billion (the “Consumer Products Select Cut”). The Committee averaged (1) the Consumer Products Select Cut with (2) the Towers Watson General Industry Index to determine median and 75th percentile target compensation.
For 2015, Towers Watson modified its General Industry Index to remove Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. Inc., Flowers Foods and Owens Corning and to add Acuity Brands, Brown-Forman, Brunswick and Nu Skin Enterprises. Therefore, for 2015, the Consumer Products Select Cut comprised 23 companies, (including seven companies that are also part of the Select Peer Group) with median revenue of $4.4 billion. The companies included in the Consumer Products Select Cut were as follows:

34


Acuity Brands Jack In The Box Inc.
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

LOGO

What We Do

 The J.M. Smucker Company
Beam Lorillard, Inc.

LOGO

What We Don’t Do

Brown-Forman

LOGO

 Mattel, Inc.
Brunswick

Pay for performance.A significant portion of the compensation for our NEOs is in the form ofat-risk variable compensation

 Molson Coors Brewing Company
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
Hanesbrands Inc.

LOGO

 Nu Skin Enterprises

No taxgross-upsfor severance payments.

Harman International Industries, Incorporated

LOGO

 Polaris Industries Inc.
Hasbro, Inc.

Base variable compensation onmultiple performance metrics to encourage balanced focus

 Revlon, Inc.
The Hershey Company Steelcase Inc.
HNI

LOGO

 Tupperware Brands CorporationNo single-trigger vesting of cash or equity-based awards upon change in control
Hormel

LOGO

Provideappropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation to reward company, business unit and individual performance

LOGO

No short-sales, hedging or pledging of our stock by our employees, officers or directors

LOGO

Award a majority of variable compensationas equity-based awards

LOGO

No fixed-duration employment agreementswith executive officers

LOGO

Maintainexecutiveclawback policiesto recoup cash and equity compensation upon certain triggering events

LOGO

No stock option/SAR repricing or exchangeof underwater options or SARs for cash

LOGO

Require our executives tomeet share retention guidelines

LOGO

Engage anindependent compensation consultant

LOGO

Engage in anannual risk assessment of our compensation programs

  

Use of Market Reference RangesIFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  . The Committee’s independent compensation consultant derives the median and 75th percentile “market reference” values for each executive position based on the average of the two relevant compensation indexes and uses these values to analyze each NEO’s actual pay from the prior fiscal year and base salary, target total cash compensation and target total direct compensation for the current year. This analysis is reviewed with the Committee and, in the case of the compensation of NEOs other than the CEO, with the CEO. In determining target total direct compensation for each executive in 2015, the Committee considered the consultant’s market reference analysis. In addition, the Committee considered a number of other important factors, including each executive’s:41


individual experience and performance;
scope of responsibilities;
relative responsibilities compared with other senior Company executives;
contribution relative to overall Company performance;
compensation relative to his or her peers within the organization; and
long-term potential.
The Committee uses the market reference range in order to establish a starting point for the compensation levels that the Committee believes would provide our NEOs with competitive compensation. However, the actual target total direct compensation approved by the Committee may be above or below the market reference range based on the Committee’s review of market compensation levels, its desire to create internal pay equity among our executives and the individual factors set forth above.
For 2015, the target total direct compensation awarded by the Committee to Mr. Fibig and to each of Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz and Ms. Chwat was between or slightly below the targeted 50th to 75th percentile range. The target total direct compensation awarded by the Committee to Ms. Cornell, excluding a one-time sign on bonus, was also between the 50th and the 75th percentile of the relevant market reference range. The total actual compensation paid for the year, as compared to target compensation approved at the beginning of the year, may differ depending on Company and individual performance. Consequently, the actual pay received by a NEO may be higher or lower than his or her market reference range.

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Compensation Elements and Targeted Mix

Our executive compensation program includes direct and indirect compensation elements. Our indirect compensation elements consist of (i) our Deferred Compensation Program, (ii) a limited perquisite program, (iii) severance and other benefits under our Executive Severance Policy, (iv) benefits under an Executive Death Benefit Plan and (v) long-term disability coverage. The Committee regularly reviews the costs and benefits of these programs.


35


We believe that direct compensation should be the principal form of compensation. The table below provides a brief description of the principal elements of direct compensation, whether such compensation is fixed or variable, and the compensation program objectives served by each pay element. From time to time, the Committee may also approve discretionary bonusesawards to executives in connection with their initial employment or for extraordinary individual performance, or a significant contribution to Companythe Company’s strategic objectives or for retention purposes.

Element  Fixed or Variable  Primary Objective

Base Salary

  

Fixed

Short-Term

Cash

  

To attract and retain executives by offering salary that is competitive with market opportunities and that recognizes each executive’s position, role, responsibility, experience and experience.individual contributions.

  

AIP award

  

Variable

Short-Term

Cash

  

To motivate and reward the achievement of our annual financial performance objectives, including local currency neutral sales growth, operating profit, gross margin and working capital, and individual objectives.capital.

  

LTIP award

  

Variable

Long-Term

Equity and Cash

  

To motivate and reward theefficient capital allocation and annual profitability performance, measured by annual economic profit, and long-term shareholder value creation, measured by the annual and cumulative relative TSR performance over rolling three-year periods.

To align executives’ interests with those of shareholders by paying 50% of the earned award in shares of our common stock (with the remaining 50% being payablesettled in cash) and including relative TSR as a key measure of long-term performance.

  
ECP

Equity Choice

Program (“ECP”)

award

  

Variable

Long-Term

Equity

  

To align executives’ interests with the interests of shareholders through equity-based compensation.

To encourage direct investment in theour Company.

To serve as an important retention tool.

• To recognize individual contributions.

The payouts under our AIP and LTIP plans are based on our achievement of performance metrics set at the beginning of the relevant measurement period. Our ECP awards are used as a retention tool and the amounts are determined at the beginning of each year and reflect the executive’s performance in the prior year. These payouts vary from year to year and thus compensation of our NEOs varies with performance.
For 2015, based on target AIP and LTIP achievement levels and actual ECP awards, the components of total direct compensation for Mr. Fibig and the average of the total direct compensation components for Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat, as a group, were as follows:

36


We believe that the significant portion of direct compensation that is variable; i.e., 78% in the case of Mr. Fibig and 73% in the case of Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat, as a group, closely aligns our executives’ compensation opportunity with our performance by enabling our executives to earn more than target compensation if we achieve superior performance, or causing them to earn less than target compensation if we do not meet our performance goals or if the value of our common stock does not increase over time. The proportionately greater variable portion of direct compensation targeted for our CEO reflects his role and responsibility as our executive most accountable to our shareholders for company-wide performance.
Long-term compensation to our NEOs includes LTIP awards and ECP awards. LTIP awards, if earned, are paid 50% in common stock and 50% in cash. Equity makes up a larger portion of total long-term compensation than cash. This approach, combined with our Share Retention Policy discussed above, is intended to promote significant long-term share ownership by each of our executives and to align their interests, and their at-risk longer term compensation, with those of our shareholders.

The Committee periodically reviews the mix between variable and fixed and short-term and long-term incentive compensation opportunities and between cash andnon-cash opportunities based on (1) benchmarking and other external data provided by our independent compensation consultant, (2) recommendations from our independent compensation consultant and (3) recommendations from our CEO and CHRO.

Direct

Our indirect compensation elements consist of (1) our Deferred Compensation ComponentsProgram and 2015401(k) savings plan, (2) a perquisite program, (3) severance and other benefits under our Executive Severance Policy, (4) benefits under an Executive Death Benefit Plan and (5) long-term disability coverage. The Committee regularly reviews the costs and benefits of these programs.

42IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

2017 Compensation Decisions

Salaries

The Committee reviews the salaries of our NEOs annually, and adjusts salaries periodically. In February 2015,2017, the Committee reviewed the base salaries of its NEOs. As a result of this review, theNEOs after consultation with its independent compensation consultant. The base salaries of each of Messrs. HaeniFibig, Mirzayantz and Mirzayantz, were increased, and the base salaries of Mr. FibigO’Leary and Ms. Chwat remained unchanged.unchanged for 2017. Mr. Haeni, who had been appointedHaeni’s base salary was increased by 4.8%, effective April 1, 2017, to reward demonstrated performance in his position in April 2014, received a $40,000 increaserole and Mr. Mirzayantz received a $60,000 increase in April 2015.

to reflect market adjustments.

Annual Incentive Plan

The Committee maintains the

During 2017, our AIP forcompensated our NEOs and other employees. Overall, the Committee seeks to establish corporate performance goals that are challenging yet attainable. For our NEOs, 2015 AIP payouts dependedexecutive officers based on the achievement of (1) specific Company-wide quantitativecertain levels of Company financial performance. Financial performance goalsmetrics are measured (A) at the consolidated corporate level for our CEO, CFO, and inGeneral Counsel and (B) at both the case ofconsolidated corporate level and the business unit level for the Group Presidents of Fragrances and Flavors.

In February 2017, the Committee approved certain changes to the AIP for 2017. The 2017 weightings for performance at the consolidated corporate level and business unit goalslevel were adjusted to balance the weightings of currency neutral sales growth and operating profit and to eliminate the individual performance metric for our executive officers. The Committee believes that these changes better reflect our focus on overall annual profitability and reduce complexity in the AIP for executive officers. In addition, if our company does not meet the corporate operating profit threshold, then no AIP payouts will be awarded to any participant, including the NEOs.

The performance metrics for the 2017 AIP and their assigned weightings were as well, and (2) individual objectives relating to leadership, succession, planning and people development. follows:

Annual Incentive Program

    

Currency

neutral sales

growth

    

Operating

profit

    Gross Margin    

Working

Capital

    

Total

Weighting

All NEOs     

 Except Group      

Presidents     

Corporate     

Weighting     

 

 LOGO  

 35%  35%  15%  15%  100%
          
    

Currency

neutral sales

growth

    

Operating

profit

    Gross Margin    

Working

Capital

    

Total

Weighting

Group     

Presidents     

Corporate     

Weighting     

 

 LOGO  

 10%  15%  0%  15%  100%

Group     

Presidents     

Business Unit     

Weighting     

 

 LOGO  

 25%  20%  15%  0%  

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  43


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Each year the Committee sets an AIP target (stated as a percentage of base salary) for each NEO. For 2015,2017, the Committee maintained the AIP percentage targets at the same level as 2014. 

 2015 Salary   
Target AIP as
  % Base Salary  
 AIP Target  
Andreas Fibig
$1,200,000
 120% 
$1,440,000
Alison A. Cornell(1)
$560,000
 80% 
$448,000
Nicolas Mirzayantz
$600,000
 80% 
$480,000
Matthias Haeni
$500,000
 80% 
$400,000
Anne Chwat
$465,000
 60% 
$279,000
Richard O’Leary(2)
$445,311
 50% 
$220,603
2016.

(1)Reflects Ms. Cornell’s salary and AIP target on an annualized basis. Her actual 2015 AIP payout was calculated on a pro rata basis to reflect her appointment as CFO effective as of July 8, 2015.
(2)Includes Mr. O’Leary’s salary as interim CFO through Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015 (including the $7,500 per month that was deferred until appointment of the permanent CFO) and as Controller and Chief Accounting Officer thereafter. Mr. O’Leary’s AIP target percentage remained unchanged following his change in role.

37


    
      2017 Salary     

Target AIP as   

% Base Salary    

    AIP Target  
  

Andreas Fibig

  $1,300,000   120%  $    1,560,000  
  

Richard O’Leary

  $500,000   80%  $400,000  
  

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  $600,000   80%  $480,000  
  

Matthias Haeni

  $550,000   80%  $440,000  
  

Anne Chwat

  $475,000   

60%

  $285,000  

Performance Metrics and Capped AIP Payouts: Based on a review of the annual and long-term financial goals, operational plans, strategic initiatives and the prior year’s actual results, the Committee annually sets the financial performance metrics for theour Company and the respective business units that it will use to measure performance as well as the relative weighting that will be assigned to each metric. The Committee then approves threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance metric. Upon achievement of the relative performance level, an executive has the opportunity to earn upthreshold (25%), target (100%) and maximum (200%) amounts. The Committee seeks to the following AIP target award for such metric:

Threshold —25%
Target100%
Maximum200%
2015 AIP Performance Metrics: establish corporate performance goals that are challenging yet attainable.

As discussed above, for 20152017 AIP awards, the Committee approved (1) the following four financial performance metrics: (i) local currency sales growth, (ii) operating profit, (iii) gross margin percentage and (iv) working capital percentage; and (2) individual leadership objectives. The financial performance metrics were selected for the following reasons:

Local currency sales growth reflects both increases in market share and sales expansion, which drives increases in gross profit. By measuring achievement exclusive of currency fluctuations, this goal helps to ensure that we are rewarding real incremental growth.
An increase in operating profit (in dollar terms) encourages the management of gross profit dollars against operating expenses. Achieving this goal helps provide the Company with the funding to reinvest in the business to drive future growth.
Improvement in gross margin percentage is an important measure for analyzing our ability to effectively recover increases in the cost of raw materials, cost discipline and operating efficiencies.
Reductions in working capital drive better operating cash flow generation. For this purpose, we define working capital as inventories and trade accounts receivable less trade accounts payable.
In addition, each NEO was assigned individual leadership objectives that were reflective of our focus on continuing to develop the people of our organization.
For 2015, the weighting assigned to each of the performance metrics was as follows:
  Corporate Participants(1)   Business Unit Participants(2)
Performance Metric Corporate Weighting   Bus. Unit Weighting   Corporate Weighting   Bus. Unit Weighting   Total Weighting  
Local Currency Sales Growth 40% 0% 20% 20% 40%
Operating Profit 25% 0% 12.5% 12.5% 25%
Gross Margin 15% 0% 0% 15% 15%
Working Capital 10% 0% 10% 0% 10%
Individual 10% 0% 0% 0% 10%
Total 100% 0% 42.5% 47.5% 100%
reasons noted below:

(1)All NEOs except our two Group Presidents.
(2)2017 AIP Performance MetricsOur two Group Presidents.Reasons for Selection
Currency neutral sales growth

•  Reflects both increases in market share and sales expansion, which drives increases in gross profit. By measuring achievement exclusive of currency fluctuations, this goal helps to ensure that we are rewarding actual incremental growth.

Operating profit

•  An increase in operating profit (in dollar terms) encourages the management of gross profit dollars against operating expenses. Achieving this goal helps provide us with the funding to reinvest in the business to drive future growth.

Gross margin percentage

•  Improvement in gross margin percentage is an important measure of our ability to effectively recover increases in the cost of raw materials, cost discipline and operating efficiencies.

•  Gross margin also promotes greater focus on R&D and innovation.

Working capital percentage

•  Reductions in working capital drive better operating cash flow generation. For this purpose, we define working capital as inventories and trade accounts receivable less trade accounts payable, expressed as a percentage of sales.

For 2015, a new individual performance metric was introduced as the Committee believes establishing operating objectives tied to the development of our people and the next generation of leadership will directly contribute to building differentiation and accelerating growth on a sustainable basis. Working capital and operating profit metrics were reduced by 5% each to accommodate the new metric. Otherwise, 2015 weightings for corporate and business unit participants remained unchanged, and continue to assign greater weight to local currency sales growth and operating profit goals because the Committee believes that these two performance metrics are the most relevant measures of overall annual Company performance and are key to driving sustained long-term growth.

38


Determination of 20152017 Performance LevelsLevels: In determining our 20152017 AIP performance threshold, target and maximum levels, the Committee considered our annual targets for 2015,2017, our 20142016 actual results and payout trends over the prior three-year and five-year periods and the pro forma impact of the Aromor acquisition.periods. The performance target level waslevels for the financial metrics were set in line with our 20152017 budget and above our 20142016 actual results, and the threshold performance target level was set above the low end of our Company’s long-term strategic growth targets.results.

44IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


2015 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

2017 Corporate and Business Unit AIP Performance: Our actual performance against our 20152017 AIP corporate financial metrics is set forth in the tables below. In establishing AIP financial performance metrics and in determining actual achievement against performance metrics, we eliminated the net impact of certainnon-core expenses andnon-core gains in order to reflect our fundamental operating results. 20152017 LTIP and AIP target performance levels and actual achievement against the target performance levels excluded costs or income associated with (i) adjustments related to the closing of our Fragrance ingredients plant in Augusta, Georgia,operational improvement initiative costs and restructuring charges, (ii) plant closings and relocations in Asia, (iii) acquisition related items, (iv) itemsincluding integration costs, (iii) an increase in the loss provision related to the reclassification ofZoomEssence litigation, (iv) certain liability accounts, (v) adjustmentsforeign currency gains related to profit improvement initiatives undertaken in the fourth quarterliquidation of 2015,a foreign entity, (v) costs associated with an FDA mandated recall, (vi) with respecta charge related to 2015 LTIP only, certain tax-related items, andNYC commercial rent tax related to prior years, (vii) with respect to 2015the operating profit metric of the 2017 AIP only, unbudgetedmark-to-market adjustments related to our Deferred Compensation Plan, (viii) charges for settlement losses related to a U.K. pension plan, (ix) for purposes of calculating economic profit under the LTIP, charges associated with recently-enacted U.S. tax legislation, and (x) costs incurred due to an interruption in supply chain for a key ingredient (together, the “2015 “2017non-core items”). Similarly, we excluded the effects of incentive compensation provisions in calculating gross margin performance in order to better focus on the underlying operating performance of our product portfolio. The Committee believes that the necessary self-funding of incentive compensation payments is covered in the operating profit component of the AIP program.

Corporate Performance

The table below reflects the 20152017 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the payouts earned for each metric and overall by each of Messrs. Fibig and O’Leary and Mmes. Cornell andMs. Chwat, who were all evaluated solely on corporate performance.

Performance Metric Threshold  Target  Maximum  Actual  
Award
Payout
(as % of
 Target) 
 
Corporate
 Weighting 
 
Total
Weighted
 Award 
Local Currency Sales Growth 2.3% 4.8% 7.3% 2.7% 37.0% 40% 14.8%
Operating Profit $611M
 $643M
 $675M
 $603M
 
 25% 
Gross Margin 44.0% 45.5% 47.0% 45.0% 75.0% 15% 11.3%
Working Capital 30.0% 28.5% 27.0% 28.7% 91.7% 10% 9.2%
Individual Objectives 
 
 
 100.0% 69.0% 10% 6.9%
Total Award (as % Target) 25% 100% 200%   
 100% 42.2%
During 2015,

Corporate Level

LOGO

As indicated above, during 2017, our corporate performance was between target and maximum for the currency neutral sales growth and operating profit performance metrics and was between threshold and target for three of the performance metrics, local currency sales growth, gross margin and working capital and was below threshold for the remaining performance metric, operating profit.metrics. The actual dollar amount earned by each NEO is set forth below under “2015“2017 Individual AIP Payouts.” With respect to the individual objectives component, the Committee reviewed each NEOs performance in 2015 against the NEO’s leadership and execution

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  45

Threshold Target Maximum Award Payout as a % of strategic and organizational individual objectives established by the Committee. The Committee determined that each NEO had met his or her individual objectives for 2015.Target 5.4% 8.1% 10.8% Currency Neutral 45.4% Sales Growth Actual 8.9% $614M $646M $678M Operating Profit 47.7% Actual $657M 44.7% 46.2% 47.7% Gross Margin 9.0% Actual 44.8% 29.5% 28.0% 26.5% Working Capital 7.5% Actual 29.0% Overall Corporate Payout 109.6%



39


Fragrance

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Fragrances Business Unit Performance

The table below reflects the 20152017 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the payouts earned for each metric and overall by Mr. Mirzayantz, our Group President, Fragrance.

Performance
Metric
 Threshold Target Max. 
Award
Payout
(as % of
Target)
 
Bus.
Unit
Weight
 
Bus. Unit
Weighted
Award
 
Corp.
Weight %
 
Corp.
Weighted
Award
 
Total
Weighted
Award
Local Currency Sales Growth 2.2% 4.7% 7.2% 37.0% 20% 7.4% 20% 7.4% 14.8%
Operating Profit $333M
 $349M
 $376M
 
 12.5% 
 12.5% 
 
Gross Margin 44.3% 45.8% 47.3% 50.0% 15% 7.5% 
 
 7.5%
Working Capital 33.2% 31.5% 29.8% 95.5% 0%
 
 10% 9.2% 9.2%
Individual 
 
 
 69.0% 10% 6.9% 
 
 6.9%
Total Award (as % Target) 25% 100% 200% 
 57.5% 
 42.5% 
 38.4%
During 2015,Fragrances.

Fragrances Business Unit

LOGO

As indicated above, during 2017, our FragranceFragrances business unit performance was between target and maximum for the currency neutral sales growth business unit performance metric and was between threshold and target for three of the performance metrics, local currency sales growth,operating profit and gross margin and working capital, and was below threshold for the remainingbusiness unit performance metric, operating profit.metrics. The actual dollar amount earned by our Group President, FragranceFragrances is set forth below under “2015“2017 Individual AIP Payouts.”

46IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT

Threshold Target Maximum Award Payout as a % of Target 5.4% 8.1% 10.8% Currency Neutral Sales 30.6% Growth (Business Unit) Actual 8.7% 5.4% 8.1% 10.8% Currency Neutral Sales 13.0% Growth (Corporate) Actual 8.9% $327M $343M $368M Operating Profit 13.8% (Business Unit) Actual $336M $614M $646M $678M Operating Profit 20.5% (Corporate) Actual $657M 44.3% 45.8% 47.3% Gross Margin 6.3% (Business Unit) Actual 44.7% 29.5% 28.0% 26.5% Working Capital 7.5% (Corporate) Actual 29.0% Overall Payout for Group President, Fragrances 91.7%


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Flavors Business Unit Performance

The table below reflects the 20152017 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the payouts earned for each metric and overall by Mr. Haeni, our Group President, Flavors.

Performance
Metric
 Threshold Target Max. 
Award
Payout
(as % of
Target)
 
Bus.
Unit
Weight
 
Bus. Unit
Weighted
Award
 Corp.  Weight % 
Corp
Weighted
Award
 
Total
Weighted
Award
Local Currency Sales Growth 2.8% 5.3% 7.8% 37.0% 20% 7.4% 20% 7.4% 14.8%
Operating Profit $326M
 $342M
 $369M
 
 12.5% 
 12.5% 
 
Gross Margin 43.0% 44.5% 46.0% 65.0% 15% 9.8% 
 
 9.8%
Working Capital 26.6% 25.3% 24.0% 115.0% 0%
 
 10% 9.2% 9.2%
Individual 
 
 
 69.0% 10% 6.9% 
 
 6.9%
Total Award (as % Target) 25% 100% 200% 
 57.5% 
 42.5% 
 40.7%

Flavors Business Unit

LOGO

During 2015,2017, our Flavors business unit performance was between target and maximum for one of the currency neutral sales growth, at maximum for operating profit business unit performance metrics working capital,and was between threshold and target for two of the performance metrics, local currency sales growth and gross margin and was below threshold for the remainingbusiness unit performance metric, operating profit.metric. The actual dollar amount earned by our Group President, Flavors is set forth below under “2015“2017 Individual AIP Payouts.”


40


2015

2017 Individual AIP Payouts

The AIP payout for 20152017 for the NEOs, based on the actual achievement of each of the performance metrics, is included in the “Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement. Based on the Corporate and Business Unit performance outlined in the tables above, 20152017 AIP payouts were as follows:

  
2015
    AIP Target ($)    
 2015 Payout
Executive As % of Target         Award ($)        
Andreas Fibig 
$1,440,000
 42% 
$607,680
Alison Cornell(1) 
$448,000
 20% 
$91,679
Nicolas Mirzayantz 
$480,000
 38% 
$184,320
Matthias Haeni 
$400,000
 41% 
$162,800
Anne Chwat 
$279,000
 42% 
$117,738
Richard O’Leary(2) 
$220,603
 42% 
$93,094

   2017
 AIP Target ($) 
  2017 Payout 

Executive

   As % of Target       Award ($)      

Andreas Fibig

 $       1,560,000                  109.6%  $       1,709,760 

Richard O’Leary

 $400,000   109.6%  $438,400 

Nicolas Mirzayantz

 $480,000   91.7%  $440,160 

Matthias Haeni

 $440,000   123.0%  $553,753(1) 

Anne Chwat

 $285,000   109.6%  $312,360 

(1)Reflects Ms. Cornell’sFor Mr. Haeni, the AIP target on an annualized basis. Thereflects the US Dollar target approved by the Compensation Committee in early 2017. Effective November 1, 2017, Mr. Haeni relocated to Hilversum, Netherlands. His actual 2015 AIP payout was calculatedpaid in Euros and converted into US Dollars based on a pro rata basisthe exchange rate of 1.188 Euros to reflect her appointment as CFO effectiveUS Dollars (the exchange rate as of July 8, 2015.December 29, 2017).
(2)Mr. O’Leary’s actual 2015 AIP payment was calculated based on his actual salary received in 2015.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  47

Threshold Target Maximum Award Payout as a % of Target 5.6% 8.3% 11.0% Currency Neutral Sales 33.3% Growth (Business Unit) Actual 9.2% 5.4% 8.1% 10.8% Currency Neutral Sales 13.0% Growth (Corporate) Actual 8.9% $337M $353M $379M Operating Profit 39.7% (Business Unit) Actual $379M $614M $646M $678M Operating Profit 20.5% (Corporate) Actual $657M 43.6% 45.2% 46.6% Gross Margin 9.4% (Business Unit) Actual 44.4% 29.5% 28.0% 26.5% Working Capital 7.5% (Corporate) Actual 29.0% Overall Payout for Group President, Flavors 123.4%


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Long-Term Incentive Plan

We believe that LTIP awards reward our executive officers, including our NEOs, for financial results and align their interests with the interests of our shareholders. Annually, the Committee reviews the LTIP to determine (1) the metrics that should be used to encourage long-term success, (2) the weightings that should be applied to such metrics and (3) the annual and cumulative targets for such metrics. The Committee believes that commencing a new three-year LTIP cycle each year (i) year:

provides a regular opportunity tore-evaluate long-term metrics, (ii)

aligns goals with the ongoing strategic planning process, and (iii)

reflects our evolving business priorities and market factors.

The Committee also annually sets a total LTIP target award for each NEO, which reflects the total LTIP award aan NEO has the opportunity to receive at the end of the three-year cycle if we meet all of our targets. To the extent that we meet the minimumDepending upon our actual performance relative to financial and TSR goals or the maximum financial and TSRrelative total shareholder return goals, the actual payout to the NEO could be significantlygreater or less or more than the total LTIP target award.

Performance Segments.  Given the difficulty in setting long-term goals in current volatile global economic environments, the Committee believes that the LTIP should continue to comprise four performance segments. Thesegments: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 (each an “annual performance segment”) and cumulative performance over the three-year period (the “cumulative performance segment”).

Performance Metrics.  For the 2015-2017 LTIP, each annual performance segment is measured equally against Economic Profit (“EP”) (12.5%) and Relative Total Shareholder Return (“Relative TSR”) (12.5%). In 2016, the Committee replaced the annual Relative TSR performance segments consistwith a cumulative,3-year Relative TSR performance metric as the sole metric for the cumulative performance segment for LTIP awards beginning with the 2016-2018 LTIP. The Committee believes that an LTIP consisting of three annual performance segments (Year 1, Year 2 and Year 3)based on EP and a cumulative segment coveringbased on Relative TSR better aligns its compensation objectives with the three-year period, with 25%interests of our shareholders and our focus on long-term growth initiatives. The tables below reflect the totalperformance metrics for the outstanding LTIP target award credited in each performance segment.

cycles and their assigned weightings:

Long-Term Incentive Plan

    Segment EP Relative TSR    


2015-2017    

LTIP     performance     cycle only    

 LOGO 

 

Year 1

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

12.5%

 

  
  

 

Year 2

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

12.5%

 

  
  

 

Year 3

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

12.5%

 

  
  

 

Cumulative Segment

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

25%

 

  
  

 

Total

 

 

 

37.5%

 

 

 

62.5%

 

  

 

100%

 

Performance Metrics48. During the three annual performance segments, Company performance is measured against two equally-weighted financial metrics, TSR and EP. IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

    Segment EP Relative TSR    

 

2016-2018    

and    

2017-2019    

LTIP     performance     cycles    

 

 

LOGO

 

 

Year 1

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

0%

 

  
  

 

Year 2

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

0%

 

  
  

 

Year 3

 

 

 

12.5%

 

 

 

0%

 

  
  

 

Cumulative Segment

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

62.5%

 

  
  

 

Total

 

 

 

37.5%

 

 

 

62.5%

 

  

 

100%

 

We believe that evaluating EP helps us identifyis a key factor in identifying the sources and drivers of value across our businesses and that EP growth is closely linked to the creation of long-term shareholder value. EP measures operating profitability after considering (i)(1) all our revenues and operating costs, (ii)(2) income taxes and (iii)(3) a charge for the capital employed in the business. Capital employed primarily consists of working capital, property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets. The capital charge is determined by applying the estimated weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) to the adjusted average invested capital employed (including changescharges and/or loss provisions associated withnon-operating events such as restructurings and tax or litigation settlements) during the relevant period. The estimated WACC rate is the blendedweighted average cost of our debt and equity capital. In determining the EP target for the 20152017 segments of the 2015-2017, 2016-2018 and 2017-2019 LTIP cycles, the Committee considered our annual targets for 2015,2017, our 20142016 actual results and payout trends over the prior three-year and five-year periods and thepro-forma impact of the acquisitions of Lucas Meyer Cosmetics and Ottens Flavors.

For the cumulative performance segment, Company performance is measured by TSR. recent acquisitions.

The Committee believes that three-year Relative TSR, as compared to other public companies in which shareholders may choose to invest, is a good indicator of our overall long-term performance, and directly ties our executives’ compensation opportunity to our share price appreciation and dividend payments relative to a majorlarge-cap index.


41


Relative TSR is calculated by measuring the change in the market price of stock plus dividends paid (assuming the dividends are reinvested) for theour Company and the S&P 500 companies over the performance period. The market price for purposes of calculating the Relative TSR of theour Company and the S&P 500 on each year-end or cycle-end date is determined based on the average closing price per share of each company’s common stock over the period of 20 consecutive trading days preceding that date, as reported by S&P Capital IQ.
For each of

Our EP goal for the three annual performance segments of each of the goals for EP and TSRour current LTIP cycles is set at the beginning of each annual performance segment and is equally weighted. Forsegment. The Relative TSR goal for the cumulative performance segment the TSR goalof each of our current LTIP cycles is set at the beginning of the three-year cycle.

The table below sets forth For the relative weightings2015-2017 LTIP cycle, the Relative TSR goal for the annual performance segments was set at the beginning of each metric for each of our current LTIP cycles:
Segment 
Economic Profit
(EP) Growth
 
Total Shareholder
Return (TSR)
relative to the S&P
500
 
Total Weighting of
Segment
Year 1 12.5% 12.5% 25%
Year 2 12.5% 12.5% 25%
Year 3 12.5% 12.5% 25%
Cumulative Segment (Year 1-Year 3) 0% 25% 25%
Total LTIP Cycle 37.5% 62.5% 100%
annual performance segment.

At the end of each year, the Committee reviews our annual performance and cumulative performance for the newly completed three-year cycle. To the extent that our annual performance has met or exceeded the threshold annual EP goal and(and for the 2015-2017 LTIP cycle, the threshold annual Relative TSR goal,goal), the Committee approves “banking” the credit that will be applied to the payout at the end of the three-year cycle. For the completed three-year cycle, the Committee approves the total payout, taking into consideration the performance for each of the prior annual performance segments.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  49


2015-2017

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

2017-2019 LTIP Target Awards

In early 2015,2017, the Committee approved the following total LTIP target awards to each of our NEOs for the 2015-2017 performance cycle, other than Ms. Cornell’s LTIP target award which was approved in May 2015 as part of her employment arrangement:

2017-2019 LTIP:

NEO

  

Total

  LTIP Target Award  

Andreas Fibig

  
$2,000,000
Alison A. Cornell (1) 
    $2,000,000

Richard O’Leary

$500,000

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  
$500,000

Matthias Haeni

  
$500,000

Anne Chwat

  
$279,000
Richard O’Leary 
$195,395285,000

(1)Reflects Ms. Cornell’s LTIP target on an annualized basis. Ms. Cornell’s actual LTIP award was pro-rated to reflect her partial year of employment.
The Committee set the cumulative three-year Relative TSR goal for the 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle at the same level that had been set for the prior year’s LTIP cycle, as follows:
CriteriaThreshold (25%)  Target (100%)  Maximum (200%)  
Cumulative TSR vs. S&P 50035th percentile55th percentile75th percentile

42


cycle. For the 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle, the Committee determined that 50% of the value of any payoutsthe awards would be denominated and paid in cash and 50% would be denominated and paid in shares, consistent with the 2013-2015 and 2014-2016prior LTIP cycles. The Committee believes that paying 50% of the LTIP value in shares creates a stronger alignment between executives and shareholders, and provides additional incentive for executives to achieve superior Company performance and to produce share price appreciation over the three-year performance cycle. The number of shares of our common stock for the 50% portion that would be paid in stock is determined based on the market price of the common stock at the beginning of the cycle. For the 20152017 cycle, it was based on $102.14$120.31 per share, the average closing market price for the twenty trading days prior to January 2, 2015,3, 2017, the first stock trading day of the cycle. At the conclusion of each of the first two annual performance segments, the dollar value and number of shares will be “banked” based on the performance of each such segment. When the final performance segment and the cumulative Relative TSR three-year cycle are concluded and the LTIP payouts are approved by the Committee, the cumulative dollar value and cumulative number of shares will beare paid to the executive.
Annual

2017 LTIP Goals and 2015 LTIP Performance

In early 2015, the Committee also set the threshold, target and maximum 2015 annual EP goal and threshold, target and maximum annual TSR goal which applies to each of the three current LTIP performance cycles, as follows:
CriteriaThreshold (25%)  Target (100%)  Maximum (200%)  
EP$270M$294M$318M
Annual TSR vs S&P 50035th percentile55th percentile75th percentile
LTIP Cycle Performance

For the 20152017 segment of each of the existing LTIP cycles, our EP of $273$260 million, as adjusted for 2015 2017non-core items, was between threshold andexceeded the target performance level. As a result, our NEOs earned approximately 34%146.6% of target based on the EP goal for the year. Our Relative TSR for 2015 was at2017 and for the 80th percentile,cumulative, three-year performance period exceeded target and, as a result, our NEOs earned approximately 200%179.0% of target based on the Relative TSR goal for 2017 and 173.1% of target based on the Relative TSR goal for the 2015 segment.three-year 2015-2017 LTIP cycle. The LTIP award earned and “banked” for the 2015 segment2017 segments of each existingthe 2016-2018 and 2017-2019 LTIP cyclecycles was therefore equal to approximately 117%146.6% of target..

2013-2015target. As previously discussed, for the 2016-2018 and 2017-2019 LTIP grant cycles, the three annual Relative TSR performance segments were replaced with the cumulative,3-year Relative TSR segment.

50IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

2017 LTIP Results

LOGO

2015-2017 LTIP Payout

As noted above, our NEOs earned approximately 34%146.6% of target based on the EP goal for 2015, and our TSR for 2015 was at179.0% of target based on the 80th percentile, resulting in our NEOs earning approximately 200% of theRelative TSR goal for the 2015 segment.2017. Our cumulative, three year Relative TSR was positioned at approximately the 74th70th percentile versus the S&P 500, which equatesequated to a payout of 196%173.1% of target.

The overall payout for the 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle was approximately 142%122.8% of target, based on the following EP and Relative TSR results against objectives, as determined by the Committee.

Segment 
Segment
Weighted
EP Result
 
Segment
Weighted
TSR Result
 
Combined
Segment
Weighted
Result
 
Segment
Weighting
 
Overall
Result
2013 191% 77% 133.8% 25.00% 33.4%
2014 133% 112% 122.4% 25.00% 30.6%
2015 34% 200% 117.0% 25.00% 29.3%
Cumulative 
 196% 195.5% 25.00% 48.9%
           
Total       100.00% 142.2%

Segment  Segment
Weighted
EP Result
   Segment
Weighted
TSR
Result
  Combined
Segment
Weighted
Result
  Segment
Weighting
  Overall
Result
 
2015   34.0%    200.0  117.0  25.0  29.2
2016   76.7%    0.0  38.4  25.0  9.6
2017   146.6%    179.0  162.8  25.0  40.7
Cumulative       173.1  173.1  25.0  43.3
Total                

 

100.0

 

 

  

 

122.8

 

 

The LTIP payout for the 2013-20152015-2017 performance cycle for the NEOs, based on the actual achievement of quantitative objectives, is discussed in greater detail following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

For the LTIP performance cycles that concluded in 2011 through and including 2015,the five-year period from 2013 to 2017, the actual overall corporate percentage payout under the LTIP against those long-term cycle performance goals ranged from approximately 105%105.2% to 150%146.4%, with an average payout of 133% over the five LTIP performance cycles.125.0%.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  51



43

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 


Equity Choice Program
We believe that equity

Equity is a key component of our long-term incentive compensation as it (1) provides participants with a meaningful stake in theour Company, thereby aligning their interests more closely with shareholders, (2) encourages participants to focus on long-term success, and (3) helps to attract and retain top talent.talent and (4) recognizes individual contributions. We believe that our ECP is an effective vehicle to encourage ownership as it provides participants the flexibility to allocate their award among three types of equity.

Annually our Committee determines

Under the dollar range of ECP awards for each level of participating executive based on peer group and long-term incentive practices survey data, a review of the competitiveness of the combined value of the ECP awards and LTIP awards with market practices and other factors that it deems appropriate. In 2015, the Committee increased the range for ECP grants to our CEO from $750,000 to $2,250,000 with a midpoint of $1,500,000 to a range of $1,000,000 to $3,500,000with a midpoint of $2,000,000. The other ranges remained the same in 2015 and were as follows:

  Lower Limit Midpoint Upper Limit
CEO $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,500,000
Group Presidents and CFO $250,000 $500,000 $750,000
General Counsel $175,000 $350,000 $525,000
The Committee then approves the actual dollar award to be granted to each NEO other than the CEO, and recommends to the independent members of the Board for approval the actual dollar award for the CEO. All ECP awards are generally subject to a vesting period of approximately three years. The Committee believes the ECP is an attractive tool for recruiting, motivating and retaining executive talent and encourages alignment with shareholders by reinforcing investment and ownership in our Company by our executives.
ECP, participants, including all of our NEOs, may choose from three types of equity award grants. For ECP grantedawards in 2015,2017, these three types were (1) Purchased Restricted Stock or Purchased Restricted Stock Units (“PRS”PRSUs”), (2) stock settled appreciation rights (“SSARs”), and (3) Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). PRS isPRSUs are assigned an adjustment factor of 120% to provide incentive to participants to invest in and accumulate shares to promote retention and increase alignment of participants’ interests with those of our shareholders. Elections are made in 5% increments. Based on the participant’s election, a participant’s dollar award value is converted into PRS,PRSUs, SSARs or RSUs on the grant date based on the market price of our common stock on such date.

All ECP awards are generally subject to a vesting period of approximately three years. The Committee believes the ECP is an attractive tool for recruiting, motivating and retaining executive talent and encourages alignment with shareholders by reinforcing investment and ownership in our Company by our executives.

The table below sets forth each of the three types of equity awards offered and their adjustment factor. During 2015,2017, ECP participants, including all of our NEOs, made choices based on the differences among thedifferent equity award types described below.


44


Types of

Equity

 

Description of Equity Type

PRSUs

 
Adjustment 
Factor
PRS
PRS

PRSUs are shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units which the Company grantsthat are granted as a match against shares of ourCompany stock purchased at full value by an ECP participant on the grant date. As an incentive to promote share accumulation and direct investment in our stock, there is a 20% adjustment upward of the award value if PRS isPRSUs are elected. If an ECP participant chooses PRS,PRSUs, then he or she must deliver funds (or shares with an equivalent value) equal to the dollar amount of the ECP award (including the 20% adjustment) that he or she is electing to receive in PRS.. Upon receipt of the funds by the Company, the ECP participant receives a matching number of PRS shares or RSUs from the Company.


During the restricted period, a PRS holder has the same rights as an ordinary shareholder including the right to vote and dividend rights (or dividend equivalents in the case of restricted stock units). Holders of restricted stock unitsPRSUs.

PRSU holders have no voting rights during the vesting period. On the vesting date, which isperiod but accrue dividend equivalents on their PRSUs. PRSUs vest approximately three years from the date of grant, PRS shares become unrestricted. PRS sharesgrant. PRSUs are the most rapid way for participants to accumulate and build share ownership based on the participant’s direct investment in ourCompany stock.

SSARs

 120%
SSARs

SSARs are a contractual right to receive the value, in shares of Company stock, of the appreciation in our stock price from the SSAR grant date to the date the SSAR is exercised by the participant. As an approximation of binomial stock option valuation methods used under ASC Topic 718 (as used for financial reporting purposes), participantsParticipants receive a number of SSARs equivalent to 4.55 times (i.e. the approximate binomial value of the SSARs) the elected SSAR award value divided by the grant price. SSARs provide upside potential for share accumulation and greater alignment with shareholders because SSARS only have value if the stock price increases after the grant date. The adjustment factor for SSARs is 1.0.


SSARs become exercisable on a stated vesting date, which is approximately three years from the grant date, and expire on the seventh anniversary of the grant date. SSARs do not require a financial investment by the SSAR grantee.

RSUs

 100%
RSUs

RSUs are our promise to issue unrestricted shares of our stock on the stated vesting date, which is approximately three years from the grant date. The adjustment factor for RSUs is 1.0. RSUs do not require a financial investment by the RSU grantee.

100%

52IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

As an example of howthe value that may be delivered by the ECP offersto the participant a range of outcomes,based on the three election types, the following table shows the different number of shares and valuesvalue to the participant at vesting for an ECP award of $500,000. For all three choices, vesting occurs approximately three years from the grant date:

Assumes a Common Share Value of $100.00 at Award(1)
  PRS(2)         RSUs      SSARs(3)
Award Value 
$500,000
 
$500,000
 
$500,000
Adjustment Factor 1.2
 1.0
 1.0
Post-Factor Value 
$600,000
 
$500,000
 
$500,000
Participant Required Investment 
$600,000
 
 
Award Shares/SSARs At Grant Date 6,000 Shares
 5,000 Shares
 22,500 SSARs
Dollar Value of Award At Vesting/Exercise (Assuming 8% Compounded Annual Stock Price Increase) (2) 
$755,827
 
$629,856
 
$584,352
Dollar Value of Award At Vesting/Exercise (Assuming 8% Compounded Annual Stock Price Decrease) 
$476,299
 
$396,916
 
______

                                                                                                            

Assumes a Common Share Value of $140.00 at Award (1)

 
    PRSU (2)   RSUs   SSARs (3) 
Award Value  $500,000   $500,000   $500,000 
Adjustment Factor   1.2    1.0    1.0 
Post-Factor Value  $600,000   $500,000   $500,000 
Participant Required Investment  $600,000         
Award Shares/SSARs At Grant Date     4,286 Shares      3,571 Shares      17,857 SSARs 
Dollar Value of Award At Vesting/Exercise (Assuming 8% Compounded Annual Stock Price Increase) (2)  $755,827   $629,856   $649,280 

Dollar Value of Award At Vesting/Exercise (Assuming 8% Compounded Annual Stock Price Decrease)

 

  

$

 

476,299

 

 

 

  $

 

396,916

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

(1)ShareDollar values and share value increase/decreaseof awards are used in this table are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended as forecasts of future stock price performance. All values shown are before tax withholding.

45


(2)PRS values at grant and vesting include the participant’s appreciation or loss on the required investment in addition to the value of the granted restricted stock. ThePRSU values exclude dividends.dividend equivalents.

(3)The examples above illustrate value delivered for each ECP grant form over the approximate three-year vesting period. However, SSARs are only taxable when the SSAR is exercised. Participants may choose to hold their SSARs longer than the three-year vesting period (up to the full seven-year contractual term) and continue to participate in future stock price appreciation, if any.
2015

2017 Equity Choice Program Awards

Our Committee annually determines the dollar range of ECP awards for each level of participating executive based on peer group and long-term incentive practices survey data, a review of the competitiveness of the combined value of the ECP awards and LTIP awards with market practices and other factors that it deems appropriate. For 2017, these ranges were as follows:

    

 

   Lower Limit   

     

 

   Upper Limit   

CEO

  $    1,000,000         $      3,500,000    

Group Presidents and CFO

  $     250,000           $       750,000      

General Counsel

  $     175,000           $       525,000      

The Committee then approves the actual dollar award to be granted to each NEO other than the CEO, and recommends to the independent members of the Board for approval the actual dollar award for the CEO.

In January 2015,February 2017, the Committee approved the 20152017 ECP values awarded to each executive, including our NEOs, (other than our CFO), with an effective grant date of May 6, 2015.3, 2017. The period of time between approval of ECP values and the actual grant date gives ECP participants time to make their irrevocable ECP elections and to arrange for the purchase of PRSshares from the Company if soPRSUs are elected. The Committee determined that the 20152017 ECP grants would vest on April 6, 2018,3, 2020, which is slightly less than three years from the grant date, to enable participants to use vested PRS shares vesting in 2020 to acquire new PRS shares in 2018, to the extent granted.

For 2015, similar2020 if they elect PRSUs for their 2020 ECP award.

Similar to prior years, the actual amount of each ECP awarded to each NEO in 2017 was based on an evaluation of the NEO’s individual performance, long-term potential, and market factors includingand retention considerations. As part of her compensation package, Ms. Cornell received an ECP award of $500,000, prorated for her hire date, which will vest in 2018. The actual value of these awards will depend on future stock price performance.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  53


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

The following table shows the ECP dollar award value approved by the Committee or Board for each NEO during 20152017 and the percentage and adjusted dollar value after application of the adjustment factor of each type of award elected by each NEO. None of the NEOs elected SSARs in 2015.

 
  2015 Unadjusted  
ECP Award
 PRS Election RSU Election
 Percent Election   
  Adjusted  
Value
 Percent Election   
  Adjusted  
Value
Adjustment Factor    120%   100%
Andreas Fibig
$2,000,000
 55% 
$1,320,000
 45% 
$900,000
Alison A. Cornell (1)
$250,000
 100% 
$300,000
 
 
Nicolas Mirzayantz
$700,000
 100% 
$840,000
 
 
Matthias Haeni
$400,000
 100% 
$480,000
 
 
Anne Chwat
$500,000
 100% 
$600,000
 
 
Richard O’Leary
$250,000
 100% 
$300,000
 
 
______
(1)Represents prorated amount received by Ms. Cornell based on her hire date.
2017.

       

 

PRSU Election

  

 

RSU Election

 
   2017 Unadjusted
ECP Award
  

 

Percent

  Election  

    Adjusted  
Value
  Percent
  Election  
  Adjusted
Value
 
Adjustment Factor    120%    100%  
Andreas Fibig $2,000,000   50%  $1,200,000   50%  $1,000,000  
Richard O’Leary $400,000   100%  $ 480,000      —  
Nicolas Mirzayantz $600,000   100%  $ 720,000      —  
Matthias Haeni $500,000     $   100%  $500,000  
Anne Chwat $475,000   100%  $ 570,000      —  

The actual equity award grants to each NEO, based on the above elections, are identified in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Information on prior ECP awards that were exercised or vested in 20152017 can be found in the Options Exercised and Stock Vested Table.

Indirect Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan

As part of our compensation program, we offer U.S.-based executives and other senior employees an opportunity to participate in our DCP. Pursuant to the terms of the DCP, we provide the same level of matching contributions to our executive officersexecutives that are available to other employees under our 401(k) savings plan. We also use the DCP to encourage executives to acquire deferred shares of our common stock that are economically equivalent to ownership of our common stock but on atax-deferred basis. We do this to encourage executives to be long-term owners of a significant equity stake in theour Company and to enhance the alignment between the interests of executives and those of our shareholders.


46


Our costs in offering the DCP consist of the time-value of money costs, the cost of the matching contribution that supplements the 401(k) savings plan, administrative costs and a 25% premium for cashamounts deferred into the IFF Stock Fund in an executive’s DCP accountaccount. The premium on amounts deferred into the IFF Stock Fund typically do not vest until approximately two years after the deferral is made, as the premium is contingent on the executive remaining employed by the Companyus (other than for retirement) for the full calendar year following the year when such deferral is made. If notional investments within the DCP increase in value, the amount of our payment obligation will increase. The time-value of money cost results from the delay in the time at which we can take tax deductions for compensation payable to a participating executive.

Additional information about the DCP and supplemental matching contributions and premiums on cash deferrals under the DCP made for NEOs may be found below under “2015 “2017Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”

Perquisite Program
Our NEO perquisites program offers non-monetary benefits that are competitive and consistent with the marketplace as determined through a market study conducted by our independent compensation consultant. Under the perquisites program, our NEOs are eligible to receive certain benefits including:
Company car or car allowance;
Annual physical exam;
Financial planning and tax preparation (up to approximately $10,000 per year);
Estate planning (up to $4,000 over a three-year period); and
Health club membership (up to $3,000 annually).
As part of the terms of his employment, Mr. Haeni is also entitled to certain transitional assistance associated with his tax, housing and retirement savings for a limited period with such benefits declining annually.
The Committee believes that the total value of our perquisites program is reasonable. Additional details concerning perquisites are included in the footnotes to the All Other Compensation Table.

Executive Severance Policy

The ESP provides severance and other benefits to executives, including NEOs, whose employment is terminated not forby the Company without cause or in the event of a termination by the executive for good reason in connection with a change in control of the Company and, in the case of the NEOs (other than Mr. O’Leary), for good reason not in connection with a change in control.certain circumstances. This policy helps us in competing with other companies in recruiting and retaining qualified executives. When recruiting an executive from another company, the executive in most cases will seek contract terms that provide compensation if his or her employment is terminated by us in

54IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

cases in which the executive has not engaged in misconduct. The level of severance pay under the ESP is based on a tier system and each executive’s assigned tier is based on the executive’s grade level. All of our NEOs are in Tier I other than Mr. O’Leary, who is in Tier II. The specific severance pay by tier was developed with the assistance of our independent compensation consultant and determined by the Committee.I. We believe that the ESP provides a level of severance pay and benefits that is within a range of competitive practice ofwith our peer group companies.

A discussion of our ESP and the payments that each of our NEOs would have been eligible to receive had a covered termination occurred as of December 31, 20152017 is set forth below under “Potential Payments upon Termination andor Change in Control.”

Executive Death Benefit Plan

Additional Benefits

Perquisite Program

Our Executive Death Benefit Plan provides participants, including eachNEO perquisite program offersnon-monetary benefits that are within the range of market practice as determined through a market study conducted by our independent compensation consultant. The Committee reviews our perquisite program on abi-annual basis with its independent compensation consultant. Based on the committee’s last review, the Committee determined that the total value of our perquisite program is within the range of market practice. Additional details concerning perquisites are included in the footnotes to the All Other Compensation Table.

Under the perquisite program, our NEOs are generally eligible to receive certain benefits including:

Company car;

Annual physical exam;

Financial planning and tax preparation (up to $10,000 per year);

Estate planning (up to $4,000 over a three-year period); and

Fitness dues or membership (up to $3,000 annually).

We may provide additional or modified perquisites to our NEOs in connection with their employment arrangements. Through October 2017, as part of the NEOs (other thanterms of his employment, Mr. O’Leary),Haeni was entitled to certain transitional assistance associated with his tax, housing and retirement savings arising from his relocation to New York. Effective November 1, 2017, Mr. Haeni relocated to Hilversum, Netherlands, and receives certain benefits as required by local law. In addition, Mr. Fibig is provided a pre-retirement death benefit equal to twice the participant’sCompany car and a Company driver, and an annual base salary less $50,000 (the death benefit provided by our basic group term life insurance plan for employeesfinancial planning and retirees). The plan also provides a death benefit post-retirement, or pre-retirement after attaining age 70, equal to the participant’s base salary for the year in which the participant retires or reaches the agetax preparation allowance of 70, assuming the participant was an executive officer, less $12,500 of group coverage for retired participants and less $50,000 for senior participants (those who have attained the age of 70 and remain employed with the Company).


47


$25,000.

Supplemental Long Term Disability

We offer our U.S.-based employees Long Term Disability (“LTD”) coverage at Company expense, which provides a benefit, calculated as a percentage of base salary, in the case of full disability. Under our group plan, the maximum base salary is $300,000, and the maximum monthly benefit is $15,000. We also offer Supplemental LTD insurance to provide a maximum monthly benefit of $25,000 for U.S.-based employees, including our NEOs, who earn a base salary plus bonus in excess of the maximum base salary of $300,000 under our group plan. The Supplemental LTD insurance premium, like our basic group LTD policy, is fully paid by the Companyus and is taxable income to employees upon receipt of the benefit.

Clawback Policy

Executive Death Benefit Plan

Our Executive Death Benefit Plan provides participants, including each of the NEOs, with apre-retirement death benefit equal to twice the participant’s annual base salary less $50,000 (the death benefit provided by our basic group term life insurance plan for employees and retirees). The triggersplan also provides a death benefit post-retirement, orpre-retirement after attaining age 70, equal to the

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  55


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

participant’s base salary for recoverythe year in which the participant retires or reaches the age of 70, assuming the participant was an executive officer, less $12,500 of group coverage for retired participants and less $50,000 for senior participants (those who have attained the age of 70 and remain employed with us).

Compensation Setting Process

Roles and Responsibilities

Compensation Committee

The Committee is responsible for overseeing the determination, implementation and administration of executive compensation (including equity awards, benefits and perquisites). The Committee recommends CEO compensation to the independent directors of the Board for their approval and approves the compensation of all other NEOs.

Compensation Consultant

Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) is engaged as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. Since August 2015, FW Cook has worked with the Committee to provide it with analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. FW Cook is engaged exclusively by the Committee on executive andnon-employee director compensation matters and does not have other consulting arrangements with us. The Committee considers the independence of FW Cook on an annual basis, and in 2017 it determined FW Cook was independent and that no conflicts of interest existed.

Management

Our CEO evaluates individual performance and, with input from the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the CEO and CHRO evaluate the competitive pay positioning for senior management members that report directly to the CEO, including our NEOs, and make recommendations to the Committee concerning each such executive’s target compensation. Our CEO follows the same process with regard to the target compensation for our CHRO, without her input, and the Committee follows the same process with regard to the target compensation for our CEO, without his input.

Shareholder Advisory Vote

As part of its compensation undersetting process, the Committee also considers the results of the prior year’s shareholder advisory vote on our executive compensation. The Committee believes these voting results provide useful insight as to whether shareholders agree that the Committee is achieving its goal of designing and administering an executive compensation recoupmentprogram that promotes the best interests of our Company and clawback policies include accounting restatements,our shareholders by providing its executives with appropriate compensation and meaningful incentives to deliver strong financial restatementsperformance and misstatements (without regardincrease shareholder value. As part of

56IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

its 2017 compensation setting process, the Committee reviewed the results of the 2016 shareholder advisory vote, in which 95.2% of the votes cast were voted in favor of our executive compensation program.

Peer Group and Benchmarking

On an annual basis, the Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our NEOs. We use a global grading structure for our NEOs, with compensation ranges for each grade. Our NEOs are placed in a particular grade based on internal factors (including scope of responsibilities and job complexity) and an external market evaluation. The external market evaluation is based on published third-party general survey information and a review of similar positions within our selected peer groups described below. This process is referred to fault),as “market benchmarking.”

Market Benchmarking

The Committee reviews its external market benchmarking and peer group data annually. The Committee’s goals are to position (1) target total cash compensation at median or slightly above and (2) target total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation) between the median to 75th percentile of relevant market benchmarks. This philosophy reflects the Committee’s approach to setting stretch goals that require above median performance to generate target payouts. In August 2016, the Committee reviewed peer group data with our independent compensation consultant for purposes of determining the appropriate peer group for setting 2017 compensation levels and opportunities.

The Committee’s independent compensation consultant provides the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile “market reference” data for each executive position based on the average of the three relevant compensation benchmarks, as further explained below. This data is used to analyze the external competitiveness of each NEO’s base salary, target total cash compensation and target total direct compensation. This analysis is reviewed with the Committee and, in the case of the compensation of NEOs other than the CEO, with the CEO as well. In determining target total direct compensation for each executive in 2017, the Committee considered the consultant’s market reference analysis. In addition, the Committee considered a number of other important factors, including each executive’s:

individual experience and performance;

scope of responsibilities;

relative responsibilities compared with other senior Company executives;

contribution relative to overall Company performance;

compensation relative to his or her peers within the organization; and

long-term potential.

The Committee uses the market reference range in order to establish a starting point for the compensation levels that the Committee believes would provide our NEOs with competitive compensation. However, the actual target total direct compensation approved by the Committee may be above or below the market reference range based on the Committee’s review of market compensation levels, its desire to create internal pay equity among our executives and the individual factors set forth above.

For 2017, the Committee awarded target total direct compensation to our NEOs that was generally within the competitive range of the targeted median to 75th percentile or at the 75th percentile. The total actual compensation paid for the year, as compared to target compensation approved at the beginning of the year, may differ depending on Company and individual performance. Consequently, the actual compensation received by an employee’s willful misconductNEO may be higher or violationlower than his or her market reference range.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  57


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

For 2017 compensation decisions regarding our NEOs, the Committee benchmarked compensation of our NEOs (other than our General Counsel) against our Peer Group and a size appropriate cut of the 2016 Towers Watson General Industry Survey and the compensation of our General Counsel against a size appropriate cut of the 2016 Towers Watson General Industry Survey and the 2016 Towers Watson Consumer Products / Food & Beverage Select Cut. Information about these benchmarking groups is set forth below.

Peer GroupSelection Criteria

Ø     U.S. publicly traded companies of comparable size with manufacturing operations (generally based on revenue of 0.4x to 2.5x and market capitalization of 0.25x to 4x compared to our company)

Ø     Strongin-house R&D activities

Ø     Global scope with significant international presence (international operations generally accounting for at least 25% of total revenues)

Ø     Growth orientation, with positive sales and earnings growth over the three years prior to the review and selection of the peer group

Ø     Companies that are included in the peer groups of at least 3 of the 16 companies that are within our current compensation peer group (“peers of current peers”)

Ø     Companies that include us in their compensation peer group

Component Companies

Ø     Church & Dwight Co, Inc.

Ø     The Clorox Company

Ø     Coty, Inc.

Ø     Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.

Ø     Edgewell Personal Care

Ø     The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

Ø     The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.

Ø     Herbalife Ltd.

Ø     The Hershey Company

Ø     McCormick & Company, Inc.

Ø     Mead Johnson Nutrition Company

Ø     Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.

Ø     Revlon, Inc.

Ø     Sensient Technologies Corporation

Ø     Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

Ø     Tupperware Brands Corporation

Position in Group

Ø     Between the 25th percentile and median for revenue and at the 50th percentile of market capitalization as of 12/31/16

Size Appropriate Cut of the Towers

Watson

General Industry Survey

Selection Criteria

Ø     up to 157 companies (depending on the position)

Ø     $1 billion to $6 billion in reported revenues

Ø     Revenues interpolated to our 2016 trailing four-quarter revenue size:

•   $3.1 billion for corporate positions

•   $1.6 billion for Fragrances

•   $1.5 billion for Flavors

Towers

Watson

Consumer Products / Food & Beverage

Select Cut

Selection Criteria

Ø     22 companies (including four companies that are also part of the 2016 Peer Group)

Ø     $1 billion to $7 billion in reported revenues, with median revenues of $3 billion

58IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Changes to 2018 Peer Group

In August 2017, the Committee reviewed its Peer Group with its independent compensation consultant for purposes of its upcoming 2018 target compensation setting process. The Committee determined not to make any change to the peer group for 2018, as it allows for the use of a Company policylargely consistent peer group that is materially detrimental tostatistically reliable, provides familiar market information and facilitates managing the Company and an employee's violation of non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality and similar covenants. compensation program on a multi-year basis.

Clawback Policy

All compensation under our 2010 Stock Award and Incentive Plan and our 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, including AIP, LTIP, ECP and other cash and equity awards, is subject to clawback, as well as payments made under our ESP.ESP, are subject to clawback.

The triggers for recovery of compensation under our compensation recoupment and clawback policies include:

accounting restatements;

financial misstatements (without regard to fault);

an employee’s willful misconduct;

violation of a Company policy that is materially detrimental to our Company; or

an employee’s violation ofnon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality and similar covenants.

Tax Deductibility

We

For our 2017 compensation decisions, we generally attemptattempted to structure executive compensation to be tax deductible. However the Committee also believes that under some circumstances, such as to attract or to retain key executives, to recognize outstanding performance or to take into account the external business environment, it may be important to compensate one or more key executives above tax deductible limits.

2016 In December 2017, the U.S. tax code was amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”), restricting the availability of tax deductibility for executive compensation paid to our NEOs. The Committee is continuing to assess the impact of the Tax Act on our compensation programs.

2018 Compensation Actions

In December 2015,early 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a changechanges to our LTIP program effectiveAIP applicable to our NEOs to adjust the weightings of certain components to align corporate and business unit metrics. Effective with the 2016-2018 grant cycle. Going forward,fiscal 2018 AIP, (1) for NEOs evaluated solely on corporate performance, the TSRcurrency neutral sales growth component will be eliminated for eachreduced to 30% of the three annual performance segments,weighting and the three-year TSRworking capital component will continueincrease to be used as20% of the sole measureweighting and (2) for NEOs evaluated on a combination of Companybusiness unit and corporate performance, for the three-year cumulative performance segment. The three-year TSRcorporate components will continue to have a 62.5% overallconstitute 20% of the weighting for(with the corporate currency neutral sales growth and working capital components each award consistent with prior years.

weighted at 5% and the corporate operating profit component weighted at 10%) and the business unit components will constitute 80% of the weighting (with the business unit currency neutral sales growth and operating profit components each weighted at 25% and the business unit gross margin and working capital components each weighted at 15%).

Non-GAAP Reconciliation

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis includes the followingnon-GAAP financial measures: local currency neutral sales, adjusted operating profit and adjusted earnings per share. Please see Exhibit A of this proxy statement for a reconciliation of such metrics.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  59



48

 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement. Based on those reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated by reference into the Company’sour Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017.

Compensation Committee

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. (Chair)

Michael Ducker

Christina Gold

Katherine M. Hudson

Dale F. Morrison

60IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


Compensation Committee
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. (Chair)
Marcello V. Bottoli
Michael Ducker
Christina Gold

49

LOGO


VIII. PROPOSAL III — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (known as the “Dodd- Frank“Dodd-Frank Act”) requires us to provide our shareholders with the opportunity to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, often referred to as “Say on Pay.”
As discussed in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the compensation tables and narratives that follow, the compensation program for our NEOs is designed (i) to attract, retain and motivate our executives who are critical to our success, (ii) to reward achievement

The core of both annual and long-term performance goals and (iii) to align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. Pursuant to our compensation program, an average of 76% of our NEOs’ 2015 target total direct compensation is considered “variable” and tied to our Company’s performance based on a number of financial goals and Company stock price performance and dividend return (TSR).

We believe that our executive compensation program strikes the appropriate balance between utilizing responsible, measured pay practices and rewarding thephilosophy is that our executives’ compensation should be linked to achievement of financial and operationaloperating performance metrics that build shareholder value. This balance value over both the short- and long-term. We have designed our compensation program to focus on elements that we believe will contribute to these shareholder value drivers. As such, our compensation program:

includes a significant equity component,

is evidenced by the following:variable and tied to multiple value-creating performance metrics,

Our AIP reflects each executive’s position, role, responsibility and experience, and

rewards the achievement ofindividual performance and contributions toward our annual performance objectives by providing awards based on the attainment of (1) four financial performance metrics: (i) local currency sales growth, (ii) operating profit, (iii) gross margin and (iv) working capital and (2) individual objectivesobjectives.

In 2017, 95.2% of the votes cast on oursay-on-pay proposal relating to leadership, succession, planning and people development.

Our LTIP rewards solid Company performance by providing awards based2016 executive compensation voted for the proposal. In deciding how to cast your vote on (i) EP and (ii) TSR performance relative tothis proposal, the S&P 500. In addition,Board requests that you consider the LTIP aligns our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by paying 50%structure of the earned award in shares of our common stock.
Our ECP incentivizes our executives to create value for our shareholders by providing equity-based compensation and encouraging direct investment by our executives.
We require our NEOs to meet certain stock ownership guidelines under our Share Retention Policy to promote alignment of our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders and to discourage excessive risk taking for short-term gains.
For additional information on theCompany’s executive compensation program, for our NEOs, including specific information about compensation in 2015, please see the informationwhich is more fully discussed in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,Analysis. along with

This vote isnon-binding; however, we value the compensation tables and narrative descriptions that follow.

We provideopinions of our shareholders withand accordingly the opportunity to cast the Say on Pay vote on an annual basis. In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, the Say on Pay vote will be an advisory vote regarding our Company’s NEO compensation program generallyBoard and does not examine any particular compensation element individually. Because the Say on Pay vote is advisory, it is not binding on our Company, our Compensation Committee or our Board. However, the Compensation Committee intends to reviewwill consider the resultsoutcome of thethis advisory vote and will be cognizant ofin connection with future executive compensation decisions.

For reasons set forth above, the feedback received from the voting results as it completes its annual review and engages inBoard recommends that you vote for the compensation planning process.

paid to the NEOs in 2017.

Accordingly, we will ask our shareholders to vote on the following resolution at the 20162018 Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that, the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs in 2017, as disclosed in this proxy statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative disclosure, is hereby approved.”

Ö

YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NEOS IN 2017

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  61

Proposal 3 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation


The Board of Directors believes the compensation of our NEOs is appropriate and promotes the best interests of our shareholders and therefore recommends that shareholders vote FOR approval of this resolution.

50

LOGO


IX. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation for:

our current CEO;

our current CFO and former interim CFO; and

our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2015.2017.

We refer to the executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table as our NEOs. A detailed description of the plans and programs under which our NEOs received the following compensation can be found in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Name and
Principal Position
 Year 
Salary
($)(1)
 
Bonus
($)
 
Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)
  
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)(5)
 
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(6)
 
All Other
Compensation
($)(7)
 
Total
($)
Andreas Fibig 2015 1,200,000
 
 3,173,165
  1,702,478
 
 133,099
 6,208,742
Chairman and CEO 2014 400,000
 1,000,000
 2,244,414
  760,534
 
 134,027
 4,538,975
                  
Alison A. Cornell (8) 2015 271,562
 250,000
 506,228
  217,787
 
 32,996
 1,278,573
CFO                 
                  
Richard O’Leary (9) 2015 445,311
 
 541,687
  200,542
 
 78,053
 1,265,593
Former Interim CFO 2014 302,872
 
 349,635
  225,148
 
 86,897
 964,552
                  
Nicolas Mirzayantz 2015 585,000
 
 1,088,973
  506,351
 
 169,083
 2,349,407
Group President, Fragrances 2014 532,500
 
 2,998,513
  762,039
 303,665
 163,172
 4,759,889
2013 510,000
 
 946,526
  1,000,974
 (96,591) 122,110
 2,483,019
                  
Matthias Haeni 2015 490,000
 
 729,004
  375,043
 
 782,736
 2,376,783
Group President, Flavors 2014 445,653
 
 624,912
  407,888
 
 485,920
 1,964,373
                  
Anne Chwat 2015 465,000
 
 738,915
  308,330
 
 155,487
 1,667,732
General Counsel 2014 465,000
 
 708,594
  419,022
 
 562,425
 2,155,041
  2013 461,250
 
 650,471
  606,067
 
 144,650
 1,862,438
_______________________

Name and Principal Position

   Year    Salary
($)(1)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)(5)
  

 

Change in

Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(6)

  All Other
Compensation
($)(7)
     

Total

($)

 

Andreas Fibig

  2017   1,300,000    3,042,803    2,916,010    —    488,636     7,747,449  

Chairman and CEO

  2016   1,275,000    2,963,837    1,670,801    —    300,595     6,210,233  
   2015   1,200,000    3,173,165    1,702,478    —   133,099     6,208,742  
          
          

Richard O’Leary

  2017   500,000    680,887    584,579    —    130,331     1,895,797  

CFO

  2016   422,131    1,346,578    227,620    —    112,537     2,108,866  
   2015   445,311    541,687    200,542    —   78,053     1,265,593  
          
          

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  2017   600,000    907,888    741,723    195,808    126,646     2,572,065  

Group President, Fragrances

  2016   600,000    1,010,428    452,834    43,291    153,913     2,260,466  
  2015   585,000    1,088,973    506,351    —   169,083     2,349,407  
          
          

Matthias Haeni (8)

  2017   543,750    699,793    855,316    —    1,057,801     3,156,660  

Group President, Flavors

  2016   518,750    830,353    492,074    —    1,537,189     3,378,366  
  2015   490,000    729,004    375,043    —   782,736     2,376,783  
          
          

Anne Chwat

  2017   475,000    668,346    481,731    —    175,383     1,800,460  

General Counsel

  2016   472,500    761,326    293,960    —    183,826     1,711,612  
   2015   465,000    738,915    308,330    —   155,487     1,667,732  
          
                               

(1)The 20152017 amounts in this column include (i) the following amounts deferred under the DCP: Ms. Cornell -- $81,667;Mr. Fibig — $117,000; Mr. O’Leary — $85,000; Mr. Mirzayantz - $58,500;— $48,000; and Ms. Chwat - $139,500,—$237,500; and (ii) the following amounts deferred under the Retirement Investment Fund Plan (401(k)): Mr. Fibig - $24,000; Ms. Cornell - $3,000; Mr. O’Leary - $22,839;— $24,000; Mr. Mirzayantz - $24,000;— $24,000 and Ms. Chwat - $24,000.—$19,000.

(2)The amounts in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columnscolumn represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted during each respective fiscal year, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Details on and assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of RSUs, PRS, SSARs, optionsPRSUs and LTIP equity incentive compensation may be found in Note 12 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152017 included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017. The grant date fair value attributable to the 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle awards included in the Stock Awards column pertains to the 50% portion of those awards that will be payable in our common stock if the performance conditions are satisfied and is based on the probable outcome of such conditions. The

62IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT

Executive Compensation


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

value of these awards at the grant date if the maximum level of performance conditions werewas to be achieved is as follows: Mr. Fibig - $2,035,200; Ms. Cornell -- $421,541;— $2,248,000; Mr. O’Leary - $198,835;— $562,000; Mr. Mirzayantz - $508,800;— $562,000; Mr. Haeni - $508,800;— $562,000; and Ms. Chwat - $283,910.— $320,340. The actual number of shares earned by the NEOs for the completed 2013-2015 LTIP cycle, for the 2015 segment of the 2014-20162015-2017 LTIP cycle and for the 20152017 segment of each of the 2015-20172016-2018 LTIP cycle and 2017-2019 LTIP cycle can be found in the narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table under the heading “Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

51


(3)The grant date fair value attributable to PRSPRSU awards included in the Stock Awards column pertains to the value of the matching portion of the award. Not reflected in this column is the value of shares delivered or cash paid by NEOs to purchase shares in fiscal year 20152017 for the participant’s portion of the PRSPRSU award. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, participants in our ECP are permitted to satisfy the purchase price of PRSPRSU shares by tendering shares of our common stock or paying cash. The following NEOs purchased or tendered the number of shares indicated in fiscal year 2015,2017, in each case at a price per share equal to the closing stock price on the date of grant: Mr. Fibig - $1,319,886— $1,134,739 for 11,176 shares; Ms. Cornell - $299,894 for 2,6088,643 shares; Mr. O’Leary - $299,974— $453,869 for 2,5403,457 shares; Mr. Mirzayantz - $839,927— $680,870 for 7,1125,186 shares; Mr. Haeni - $479,958— $472,775 for 4,0643,601 shares; and Ms. Chwat - $599,948— $538,946 for 5,0804,105 shares.

(4)The 20152017 amounts in this column include the following amounts earned under the 20152017 AIP: Mr. Fibig - $607,680; Ms. Cornell - $91,679;— $1,709,760; Mr. O’Leary - $93,094;— $438,400; Mr. Mirzayantz - $194,320;— $440,160; Mr. Haeni - $192,800; and— $553,753; Ms. Chwat - $117,738.— $312,360.

(5)LTIP cycles have four performance segments related to each year in the three-year LTIP cycle and the cumulative results for the full three-year cycle. Any amounts earned under a performance segment are credited on behalf of the executive at the end of the relevant segment, but such credited amounts are not paid until the completion of the three-year LTIP cycle. Upon completion,one-half of any award earned for a completed LTIP cycle is paid in cash and the remaining half is paid in shares of our common stock. The cash portion of the NEOs’ credited awards is reported in this column for the year in which such amount was earned, rather than in the year in which such award is actually paid. The amounts in this column related to 20152017 include the amounts earned and credited for the 20152017 segment of the 2014-20162016-2018 and 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycles and the following amounts earned for the 20152017 and cumulative segments under the completed 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle: Mr. Fibig - $509,798; Ms. Cornell - $55,192;— $839,750; Mr. O’Leary - $56,876;— $82,042; Mr. Mirzayantz - $175,781;— $209,938; Mr. Haeni - $65,992; and— $209,938; Ms. Chwat - $108,984.— $117,145.

(6)The amounts in this column represent the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the NEO’s accumulated benefit under our U.S. Pension Plan (our qualified defined benefit plan) and our Supplemental Retirement Plan (ournon-qualified defined benefit plan). Earnings in the interest bearing account in the DCP were not above-market, and earnings in other investment choices under the DCP were not preferential, and therefore are not included.

(7)Details of the 20152017 amounts set forth in this column are included in the All Other Compensation Table.

(8)Ms. CornellOn November 1, 2017, Mr. Haeni relocated to Hilversum, Netherlands. As a result, for 2017 a portion of his salary was appointed CFO effective July 8, 2015. Thepaid in Euros and his AIP and LTIP awards are paid in Euros. For his 2017 salary, we determined the US Dollar value of Euro portion using the exchange rate of 1.19 Euros to US Dollars, which was the exchange rate in effect when he relocated. For the 2017 AIP and LTIP amounts in the SalaryNon-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan column, his awards have been or will be paid in Euros and Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation columns represent prorated amountsconverted into US Dollars based on her partial yearthe exchange rate of service. The amount in the Bonus column represents the cash bonus paid1.188 Euros to Ms. Cornell in connection with her hiring,US Dollars (the exchange rate as further described above in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation Setting Process - New Executive Officer Compensation."of December 29, 2017).
(9)The amount in the Salary column includes $50,055 of deferred salary that was received three months following the appointment of our new CFO.

52

Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the median annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO, Andreas Fibig.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  63


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

As of December 29, 2017, our employee population consisted of approximately 7,300 individuals working at our parent company and consolidated subsidiaries, of which approximately 1,500 are located in the United States and 5,800 are located outside the United States. We selected December 29, 2017, the last day of our fiscal year, as the determination date for identifying the median employee.

To identify the median employee, we calculated the amount of annual target total cash compensation (salary plus target annual incentive compensation) paid to all of our employees (other than the CEO) based on the compensation information maintained in a centralized database. Since we do not widely distribute annual equity-based awards to our employees, the value of such awards was excluded from the compensation calculation used to determine the median employee. We did not make anycost-of-living or other adjustments in identifying the median employee.

Based on this methodology, the median employee was a full-time, salaried employee in the Netherlands. We calculated the 2017 total annual compensation of such employee in accordance with the requirements of the executive compensation rules for the Summary Compensation Table (Item 402(c)(2)(x) of ContentsRegulationS-K). Under this calculation, the median employee’s annual total compensation was $61,140, based on a Euro to US Dollar exchange rate of $1.1888 (the exchange rate as of December 29, 2017).

Utilizing the same executive compensation rules, and consistent with the amount reported in the “Total” Column of our 2017 Summary Compensation Table above for the CEO, the annual total compensation of our CEO was $7,747,449. The resulting ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to the annual total compensation of the median employee was 126.7 to 1.


20152017 All Other Compensation
 
Dividends
on Stock
Awards
($)(1)
 
Company
Contributions
to
Savings and
Defined
Contribution
Plans($)(2)
 
Auto
($)(3)
 
Financial/
Estate
Planning,
Tax
Preparation
and Legal
Services($)
 
Executive
Death
Benefit
Program
($)(4)
 
Matching
Charitable
Contributions($)
 
Relocation
Expenses
($(5)
 
Tax
Equalization
/ Assistance
($)(6)
 Other ($)(7) 
Total
($)
Andreas Fibig17,502
 18,550
 61,472
 15,222
 9,105
 
 1,800
 120
 8,237
 133,098
Alison A. Cornell1,460
 3,000
 15,698
 5,450
 2,738
 
 
 
 4,650
 32,996
Richard O’Leary21,628
 18,550
 11,803
 7,500
 11,681
 2,500
 
 
 4,391
 78,053
Nicolas Mirzayantz60,025
 55,751
 16,010
 10,055
 12,455
 3,500
 
 
 11,287
 169,083
Matthias Haeni19,812
 90,305(8)
 6,746
 
 3,900
 
 145,458(8)
 507,559(8)
 8,957
 782,736
Anne Chwat42,156
 59,527
 15,462
 9,836
 11,290
 10,000
 
 
 7,216
 155,487
______________________

   Dividends
on Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Company
Contributions
to Savings
and Defined
Contribution
Plans

($)(2)
  Auto
($)(3)
  

 

Financial/
Estate
Planning,
Tax
Preparation
and Legal
Services

($)

  Executive
Death

Benefit
Program
($)(4)
  Matching
Charitable
Contributions
($)
  Cost of
Living
Allowance
($)
  Tax
Equalization/
Assistance
($)(5)
  Other
($)(6)
  Total
($)
 

Andreas Fibig

  38,197   374,644   54,593   6,950   5,313            8,939   488,636 

Richard O’Leary

  15,161   60,202   16,376   9,613   14,588   10,000         4,391   130,331 

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  34,265   57,696   12,200      12,448   1,500         8,537   126,646 

Matthias Haeni

  17,615   59,573(7)   14,099      7,046      60,000(7)   890,261(7)   9,207   1,057,801 

Anne Chwat

  26,094   102,255   13,800      11,155   10,000         12,079   175,383 

(1)The amounts in this column represent dividendsdividend equivalents paid during 20152017 on shares of PRS.PRS and PRSUs.

(2)The amounts in this column represent: (i) matching amounts paid under our Retirement Investment Fund Plan (401(k)); (ii) amounts matched or set aside by our Company under our DCP (which are matching contributions that would otherwise be made under our 401(k) plan but for limitations under U.S. tax law); (iii) the dollar value of premium shares credited to the accounts of participants in the DCP who elect to defer their cash compensation into the IFF Stock Fund; and (iv) for Mr. Haeni, $35,663$49,729 contributed to his European retirement plan in lieu of participation in the Company'sCompany’s savings plans and an additional savings allowance of $54,642.$9,844. The premium shares may be forfeited if the executive does not remain employed by our Company for the full calendar year following the year during which such shares are credited. Dividend equivalents are credited on shares (including premium shares) held in accounts of participants who defer into the IFF Stock Fund. Dividend equivalents are included in the Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year column of theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and are not included in the amounts represented in this column.

(3)The amounts in this column represent the personal use of automobiles provided by our Company. The value of such use was determined by using standard IRS vehicle value tables and multiplying that value by the percent of personal use. The value of fuel was determined by multiplying the overall fuel cost by the percent of personal use. In both cases personal use percentages were determined on a mileage basis. The amounts in this column also include the cost paid by us for a parking garage and for use of our Company driver.

64IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

(4)The amounts in this column represent costs for the corporate-owned life insurance coverage we have purchased to offset liabilities that may be incurred under our Executive Death Benefit Program. No participant in this program has or will have any direct interest in the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policy.

(5)The amounts in this column represent (i) for Mr. Fibig, expenses paid in connection with his relocation and (ii) for Mr. Haeni $1,458 of relocation expenses and an additional $144,000 of living allowance.
(6)The amounts in this column represent (i) for Mr. Fibig, the tax gross up o $1,210 on his relocation expenses, and (ii) for Mr. Haeni, a tax gross up of $1,220credit on his relocation expenses,tax equalization payment, a tax equalization payment of $96,623,$781,079, and a tax gross up of $409,716$174,182 on the tax equalization payment. The tax gross up and tax equalization payments to Mr. Haeni ended in 2017.

(7)(6)The amounts in this column represent (i) health club membership, (ii) annual physical examination and (iii) amounts paid under our Supplemental Long-Term Disability Plan.

(7)
(8)In connection with his relocation to the United States, we agreed to provide Mr. Haeni has elected to participate in an alternatealternative savings program and, certain transitional assistance for the four years following his relocation. Inin lieu of his participation in our 401(k) plan and DCP, the Company will provideprovides Mr. Haeni an annual savings allowance equal to 11% of his annual base salary as an employer contribution to the Swiss pension plan of his choosing. In addition, the Company will provideThrough October 2017, Mr. Haeni received certain transitional assistance, including (i) a monthly living allowance, during 2015 of $12,000, decreasing by $3,000 annually for each subsequent year through 2017, (ii) tax equalization payments (which will be subject(subject togross-up) during 2015 equal to 75%25% of the difference in income taxation between Singapore and New York City, decreasing by 25% for each subsequent year through 2017, and (iii) an additional savings allowance during 2015 equal to 75%25% of the difference between the annual savings allowance and his previous pension payments, decreasing by 25% for each subsequent year through 2017.payments.

53


Employment Agreements or Arrangements

Mr. Fibig

Pursuant to the terms of a letter agreement dated May 26, 2014 between our Company and Mr. Fibig, he became our CEO effective September 1, 2014 and Chairman of the Board as of December 1, 2014.

Under this agreement, Mr. Fibig’s employment is on anat-will basis until terminated by either party. Mr. Fibig is entitled to the following compensation under the agreement:

Minimum annual base salary of $1,300,000 in 2016;

A target AIP bonus of 120% of his base salary and a potential maximum annual bonus of 240% of his base salary;

An LTIP target of $2,000,000 and a maximum of up to 200% of the LTIP target; and

Participation in the ECP program.

Mr. Fibig’s salary is reviewed by the Board periodically and may be increased, but not decreased. The letter agreement provides fornon-competition,non-solicitation,non-disclosure, cooperation andnon-disparagement covenants.

Mr. Fibig’s letter agreement grants him certain rights upon termination of his employment. These rights are described in this proxy statement under the heading “Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements - Other Separation Arrangements.”

Other NEOs

The compensation of our other NEOs is approved by the Compensation Committee and is generally determined by the terms of the various compensation plans in which they are participants and which are described in this proxy statement more fully above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, in the narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and under the heading “Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.” In addition, their salary is reviewed, determined and approved on an annual basis by our Compensation Committee. Executives also may be entitled to certain compensation arrangements provided or negotiated in connection with their commencement of employment with our Company.Company, or as required by local law.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  65


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

2017 Grants ofPlan-Based Awards

The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during 2015.2017. The amounts reported in the table under “Estimated Future Payouts underNon-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” and “Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” represent the threshold, target and maximum awards under our AIP and LTIP programs. The performance conditions applicable to the AIP and LTIP are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

With regard to the AIP, the percentage of each NEO’s target award that was actually achieved for 20152017 based on satisfaction of the AIP performance conditions is discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The amount actually paid to each NEO in 20162018 based on 20152017 performance under the AIP is included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

With regard to the LTIP, the amounts of each NEO’s award that were actually achieved for 2013-20152015-2017 based on satisfaction of the performance conditions for the 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP and the 20152017 segment of each of the 2014-20162016-2018 LTIP and 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycles are set forth following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. In addition, cash amounts earned by each NEO for the cumulative and 20152017 segment of the 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle and the 20152017 segments of the 2014-20162016-2018 LTIP and 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycles are also included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. However, any cash or shares credited to a NEO based on achievement of performance conditions during a segment will not be paid until completion of the full LTIP cycle and could be forfeited if a NEO leaves the Company prior to the payment date.



54


2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Name 
Type of
Award (1)
 Grant Date (2) 
Date of
Compensation
Committee
Approval
 
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (3)
 
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (4)
 
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(5)
 
Grant
Date
Fair Value
of
Stock
Awards
($)(6)
        
 
Threshold
($)
 
 
Target
($)
 
 
Maximum
($)
 
 
Threshold
($)
 
 
Target
($)
 
 
Maximum
($)
    
Andreas Fibig AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 360,000 1,440,000
 2,880,000
          
  2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 250,000 1,000,000
 2,000,000
 250,000
 1,000,000
 2,000,000
   996,182
  PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015             11,176
 1,319,886
  RSU 5/6/2015 2/9/2015             7,620
 857,098
                       
Alison A. Cornell AIP 7/8/2015 5/19/2015 54,312 217,249
 434,498
          
  2015 LTIP 7/8/2015 5/19/2015 51,781 207,125
 414,250
 51,781
 207,125
 414,250
   206,334
  PRSU 8/17/2015 5/19/2015             2,608
 299,894
                       
Richard O’Leary AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 55,151 220,603
 441,205
          
  2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 24,425 97,698
 195,396
 24,425
 97,698
 195,396
   97,325
  RSU 1/2/2015 11/20/2014             1,487(7)
 144,388
  PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015             2,540
 299,974
                       
Nicolas Mirzayantz AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 120,000 480,000
 960,000
          
  2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 62,500 250,000
 500,000
 62,500
 250,000
 500,000
   249,046
  PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015             7,112
 839,927
                       
Matthias Haeni AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 100,000 400,000
 800,000
          
  2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 62,500 250,000
 500,000
 62,500
 250,000
 500,000
   249,046
  PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015             4,064
 479,958
                       
Anne Chwat AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 69,750 279,000
 558,000
          
  2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 34,875 139,500
 279,000
 34,875
 139,500
 279,000
   138,967
  PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015             5,080
 599,948

Name

 Type of
Award (1)
 Grant
Date (2)
  Date of
Compensation
Committee /
Board

Approval
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3)
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (4)
  

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units

(#) (5)

  

Grant Date 
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards

($) (6)

 
             Threshold  
($)
     Target   
($)
     Maximum   
($)
    Threshold  
($)
    Target  
($)
    Maximum  
($)
       
Andreas Fibig AIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   390,000   1,560,000   3,120,000       
 2017 LTIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   250,000   1,000,000   2,000,000   250,000   1,000,000   2,000,000    908,071 
  PRSU  5/3/2017   2/7/2017         8,643   1,134,739 
  RSU  5/3/2017   2/7/2017         7,203   999,993 
             
Richard O’Leary AIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   100,000   400,000   800,000       
 2017 LTIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   62,500   250,000   500,000   62,500   250,000   500,000    227,018 
  PRSU  5/3/2017   2/7/2017         3,457   453,869 
             
Nicolas Mirzayantz AIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   120,000   480,000   960,000       
 2017 LTIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   62,500   250,000   500,000   62,500   250,000   500,000    227,018 
  PRSU  5/3/2017   2/7/2017         5,186   680,870 
             
Matthias Haeni AIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   118,343   473,372   946,744       
 2017 LTIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   62,500   250,000   500,000   62,500   250,000   500,000    227,018 
  PRSU  5/3/2017   2/7/2017         3,601   472,775 
             
Anne Chwat AIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   71,250   285,000   570,000       
 2017 LTIP  2/7/2017   2/7/2017   35,625   142,500   285,000   35,625   142,500   285,000    129,400 
  PRSU  5/3/2017   2/7/2017                           4,105   538,946 

(1)AIP = 20152017 AIP
2015

2017 LTIP = 2015-20172017-2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle

RSU = Restricted Stock Unit
PRS = Purchased Restricted Stock

PRSU = Purchased Restricted Stock Unit

RSU = Restricted Stock Unit

(2)All equity, AIP and LTIP grants were made under our 2015 SAIP. The material terms of these types of awards are described in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

(3)AIP amounts in this column are the threshold, target and maximum dollar values under our 20152017 AIP. 20152017 LTIP amounts in this column are the threshold, target and maximum dollar values of the 50% portion of our 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle that would be payable in cash if the performance conditions are satisfied.

66IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

(4)20152017 LTIP amounts in this column are the threshold, target and maximum dollar values of the 50% portion of our 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle that would be payable in stock if the performance conditions are satisfied. The number of shares of our common stock for the 50% portion payable in stock was determined at the beginning of the 20152017 LTIP cycle, based on $102.14$120.31 per share, the average closing market price of a share of our common stock for the 20 trading days preceding January 1, 2015,3, 2017, the first trading day of the 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle (except for Ms. Cornell's stock portion which was based on $111.19 per share, the average closing market price for the 20 trading days preceding July 8, 2015).cycle. However, the actual value to be realized may vary depending on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the payout date of 20152017 LTIP awards.

(5)The amounts in this column represent the number of PRS shares or PRSUs and RSUs granted under the ECP in 2015 on the grant date. DividendsECP. Dividend equivalents are paid on PRS shares.PRSUs. Footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table states the dollar amount delivered by our NEOs (in tendered shares or cash) for these PRSPRSU awards. The material terms of the ECP awards are described in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion & Analysis.”

(6)The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to our NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2017, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of LTIP awards pertains to the 50% portion of those awards that will be payable in shares of our common stock if the performance conditions are satisfied, and is based on the probable outcome of such conditions.
(7)This award represents a grant of RSUs to Mr. O'Leary for acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  67


55

 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 


Long-Term Incentive Plan
2013-2015

2015-2017 LTIP Payout

The following table sets forth the total amount earned by each NEO based on achievement of the corporate performance goals for each segment under the 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle and based on each executive’s target amount (or reduced target amount for each NEO who was not employed in his or her current role for the entire three-year cycle). The amount reported in the “Total” column is the amount being paid out to the NEOs in 20152018 following completion of the 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle.

 
Segment I
(2013)
 
Segment 2
(2014)
 
Segment 3
(2015)
 
Cumulative
(2013 – 2015)
 Total
 
Cash
($)
 
Shares
(#)
 
Cash
($)
 
Shares
(#)
 
Cash
($)
 
Shares
(#)
 
Cash
($)
 
Shares
(#)
 
Cash
($)
 
Shares
(#)
Andreas Fibig (1)
 
 102,265
 1,021
 292,500
 2,921
 217,298
 2,172
 612,063
 6,114
Alison A. Cornell (2)
 
 
 
 35,458
 319
 19,734
 176
 55,192
 495
Richard O’Leary24,350
 369
 22,276
 338
 21,293
 323
 35,583
 540
 103,502
 1,570
Nicolas Mirzayantz75,263
 1,141
 68,850
 1,044
 65,813
 998
 109,969
 1,668
 319,895
 4,851
Matthias Haeni28,255
 428
 25,848
 392
 24,708
 374
 41,285
 628
 120,096
 1,822
Anne Chwat46,663
 708
 42,687
 647
 40,804
 619
 68,181
 1,032
 198,335
 3,006
____________________
(1)    Amount related to 2014 is prorated based on Mr. Fibig’s appointment as CEO in September 2014.
(2)    Amount related to 2015 is prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015.

56


2014-2016

   

 

Segment 1

(2015)

  

 

Segment 2

(2016)

  

 

Segment 3

(2017)

  

 

Cumulative

(2015 — 2017)

  Total 
   Cash
($)
  Shares
(#)
  Cash
($)
  Shares
(#)
  Cash
($)
  Shares
(#)
  Cash
($)
  Shares
(#)
  Cash
($)
   Shares 
(#)
 

Andreas Fibig

  292,500   2,864   95,875   939   407,000   3,985   432,750   4,234   1,228,125   12,022 

Richard O’Leary

  28,576   280   9,367   92   39,763   389   42,279   415   119,985   1,176 

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  73,125   716   23,969   235   101,750   996   108,188   1,059   307,032   3,006 

Matthias Haeni

  73,125   716   23,969   235   101,750   996   108,188   1,059   307,032   3,006 

Anne Chwat

  40,804   399   13,375   131   56,777   555   60,369   594   171,325   1,679 

2016-2018 LTIP Credit

Based on our achievement of the corporate performance goals for the 20152017 segment (the second segment) of the 2014-20162016-2018 LTIP cycle and the executive’s target amount, the following cash amounts and number of shares of our stock have been credited on behalf of the executive:

  
Segment 2      
(2015)      
  
Cash        
($)        
Shares    
(#)    
Andreas Fibig292,500
2,921
Alison A. Cornell (1)35,458
319
Richard O’Leary21,995
257
Nicolas Mirzayantz73,125
855
Matthias Haeni73,125
855
Anne Chwat40,804
477
____________________
(1)    Amount prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015.
2015-2017

    

 

Segment 2

(2017)

 
    Cash
($)
  Shares
(#)
 

Andreas Fibig

  $        183,250                1,536  

Richard O’Leary

  $18,325    154  

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  $45,813    384  

Matthias Haeni

  $45,813    384  

Anne Chwat

  $26,113    218  

2017-2019 LTIP Credit

Based on our achievement of the corporate performance goals for the 20152017 segment (the first segment) of the 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle and the executive’s target amount, the following cash amounts and number of shares of our stock have been credited on behalf of the executive:

   

 

Segment 1

(2017)

 

 
   Cash
        ($)        
     

Shares

        (#)        

 

Andreas Fibig

  183,250     1,523  

Richard O’Leary

  45,813     381  

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  45,813     381  

Matthias Haeni

  45,813     381  

Anne Chwat

  26,113        217  

68IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  
Segment 1      
(2015)      
  
Cash        
($)        
Shares    
(#)    
Andreas Fibig292,500
2,864
Alison A. Cornell (1)35,458
319
Richard O’Leary28,576
280
Nicolas Mirzayantz73,125
716
Matthias Haeni73,125
716
Anne Chwat40,804
399
____________________
(1)    Amount prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015.


57

 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 


Equity Compensation Plan Information

We currently grant equity awards under our 2015 SAIP only, which replaced our 2010 SAIP.Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2010 SAIP”). The following table provides information regarding our common stock which may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015.

Plan Category 
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
 
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
 
  (a) (b) (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) 843,326
(2)52.59
(3)2,547,132
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (4) 204,433
 52.59
(3)229,995
(5)
Total 1,047,759
 52.59
(3)2,777,127
 
2017.

Plan Category

 Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
      Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
      Number of
securities

remaining
available for

future issuance
under

equity
compensation

plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
     
   (a)     (b)     (c)    

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

  616,057   (2)  $64.25   (3)   2,150,570   (4) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (5)

  249,292   $64.25   (3)   200,990   (6) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

  865,349      $64.25   (3)   2,351,560     

(1)Represents the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2015 SAIP”).SAIP. The 2015 PlanSAIP replaced the Company’s 2010 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”)SAIP and provides the source for future deferrals of cash into deferred stock under the Company’s Deferred Compensation PlanDCP (with the Deferred Compensation PlanDCP being deemed a subplansub-plan under the 2010 PlanSAIP for the sole purpose of funding deferrals under the IFF ShareStock Fund).

(2)Includes options, RSUs, SSARs, the number of shares to be issued under the 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle based on actual performance, and the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2014-20162016-2018 and 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycles if the performance conditions for each of those cycles are satisfied at the maximum level. The number of SSARs that may be issued upon exercise was calculated by dividing (i) the product of (a) the excess of the closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of 20152017 over the exercise price, and (b) the number of SSARs outstanding by (ii) the closing market price on the last trading day of 2015.2017. Excludes outstanding shares of PRS under the 2010 SAIP and 2000 SAIP.

(3)Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options and SSARs. Excludes RSUs, shares credited to accounts of participants in the DCP and shares that may be issued under the 2013-20152016-2018 and 2014-20162017-2019 LTIP cycles.

(4)We currently have two equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our shareholders: (i) the DCP, which is described on page 4674 and (ii) a pool of shares that may be used for annual awards of 1,000 shares to eachnon-employee director. Although we are no longer granting these annual 1,000 share stock awards to directors, the pool of shares remains authorized.

(5)Includes 186,245157,240 shares remaining available for issuance under the DCP and 43,750 shares remaining available for issuance from a pool of shares that may be used for annual awards of 1,000 shares to eachnon-employee director.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  69


58

 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 


2017 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs at December 31, 2015.

2015 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Name Grant Date Grant Type (1) 
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
 
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(2)
Andreas Fibig 4/30/2013 RSU 1,295
(3)154,934
 
 
  9/1/2014 2014 LTIP 3,942
(4)471,657
 8,886
(5)1,063,121
  2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 2,864
(6)342,668
     14,684
(7)1,756,794
  10/15/2014 RSU 7,967
(8)953,172
 
 
  5/6/2015 RSU 7,620
(9)911,657
 
 
  5/6/2015 PRS 11,176
(9)1,337,097
 
 
             
Alison A. Cornell 7/8/2015 2014 LTIP 319
(4)38,214
     1,682
(5)201,234
  7/8/2015 2015 LTIP 319
(6)38,214
     3,180
(7)380,455
  8/17/2015 PRSU 2,608
(10)312,021
 
 
             
Richard O’Leary 4/30/2013 PRS 3,109
(11)371,961
 
 
  2/5/2014 2014 LTIP 526
(4)62,892
 878
(5)105,044
  5/13/2014 PRS 2,749
(12)328,890
 
 
  1/2/2015 RSU 1,487
(13)177,905
 
 
  2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 280
(6)33,455
      1,436
(7)171,803
  5/6/2015 PRS 2,540
(9)303,886
 
 
             
Nicolas Mirzayantz 4/30/2013 PRS 9,327
(11)1,115,882
 
 
  2/5/2014 2014 LTIP 1,750
(4)209,372
 2,924
(5)349,827
  5/13/2014 PRS 7,943
(12)950,301
 
 
  6/13/2014 RSU 20,000
(14)2,392,800
 
 
  2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 716
(6)85,667
      3,672
(7)439,318
  5/6/2015 PRS 7,112
(9)850,880
 
 
             
Matthias Haeni 4/30/2013 PRS 1,922
(11)229,948
 
 
  2/5/2014 2014 LTIP 1,750
(4)209,372
 2,924
(5)349,827
  5/13/2014 PRS 3,666
(12)438,600
 
 
  2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 716
(6)85,667
 3,672
(7)439,318
  5/6/2015 PRS 4,064
(9)486,217
 
 
             
Anne Chwat 4/30/2013 PRS 6,607
(11)790,461
 
 
  2/5/2014 2014 LTIP 976
(4)116,739
 1,630
(5)195,013
  5/13/2014 PRS 5,499
(12)657,900
 
 
  2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 399
(6)47,733
 2,050
(7)245,262
  5/6/2015 PRS 5,080
(9)607,771
 
 
_________________________
2017.

Name  

Grant

Date

  

Grant

Type (1)

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

       

Market

Value of

Shares

or Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

($)(2)

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of Unearned

Shares, Units

Or Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

   

 

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested

($)(2)

 

Andreas Fibig

  5/6/2015  RSU   7,620   (3)   1,162,888      
   5/6/2015  PRS   11,176   (3)   1,705,569      
   2/8/2016  2016 LTIP   2,340   (4)   357,135    12,576   (5)        1,919,223       
   5/2/2016  RSU   11,685   (6)   1,783,248      
   5/2/2016  PRSU   6,009   (6)   917,033      
   2/7/2017  2017 LTIP   1,523   (7)   232,452    14,546   (8)        2,219,865       
   5/3/2017  RSU   7,203   (9)   1,099,250      
   5/3/2017  PRSU   8,643   (9)   1,319,008      

Richard O’Leary

  5/6/2015  PRS   2,540   (3)   387,629      
   2/8/2016  2016 LTIP   234   (4)   35,782    1,256   (5)        191,678       
   5/2/2016  PRSU   2,754   (6)   420,288      
   11/1/2016  RSU   7,472   (10)   1,140,302      
   2/7/2017  2017 LTIP   381   (7)   58,169    3,636   (8)        554,890       
   5/3/2017  PRSU   3,457   (9)   527,573      

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  5/6/2015  PRS   7,112   (3)   1,085,362      
   2/8/2016  2016 LTIP   585   (4)   89,284    3,144   (5)        479,806       
   5/2/2016  PRSU   6,510   (6)   993,491      
   2/7/2017  2017 LTIP   381   (7)   58,169    3,636   (8)        554,890       
   5/3/2017  PRSU   5,186   (9)   791,435      

Matthias Haeni (12)

  5/6/2015  PRS   4,064   (3)   620,207      
   2/8/2016  2016 LTIP   585   (4)   89,284    3,144   (5)        479,806       
   5/2/2016  PRSU   5,007   (6)   764,118      
   2/7/2017  2017 LTIP   381   (7)   58,169    3,636   (8)        554,890       
   5/3/2017  RSU   3,601   (9)   549,549      

Anne Chwat

  5/6/2015  PRS   5,080   (3)   775,259      
   2/8/2016  2016 LTIP   333   (4)   50,776    1,794   (5)        273,782       
   5/2/2016  PRSU   5,258   (6)   802,423      
   2/7/2017  2017 LTIP   217   (7)   33,111    2,072   (8)        316,208       
   5/3/2017  PRSU   4,105   (9)   626,464           

(1)20142016 LTIP = 2014-20162016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle
2015

2017 LTIP = 2015-20172017-2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle

PRS = Purchased Restricted Stock

RSU = Restricted Stock Unit

PRSU = Purchased Restricted Stock Unit

RSU = Restricted Stock Unit

(2)The market value was determined based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2015.29, 2017. For PRS and PRSU awards, the amounts in this column do not reflect the purchase price paid by the NEO for PRS shares under the ECP as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

(3)This award was granted to Mr. Fibig as a non-employee director and vests on April 30, 2016.6, 2018.

(4)This amount represents the number of shares of stock that have been credited for the 20142016 and 2015 segment2017 segments of the 2014-20162016-2018 LTIP cycle. These shares will remain unvested until the completion of the full three-year LTIP cycle.

59


(5)This amount represents the maximum number of shares of stock that remain subject to the achievement of specified performance objectives over the remaining two open segments of the 2014-20162016-2018 LTIP cycle. Shares earned during any segment of the 2014-20162016-2018 LTIP cycle will remain unvested until the completion of the full three-year cycle.

70IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

(6)This award vests on April 2, 2019.

(6)(7)This amount represents the number of shares of stock that have been credited for the 20152017 segment of the 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle. These shares will remain unvested until the completion of the full three-year LTIP cycle.

(7)(8)This amount represents the maximum number of shares of stock that remain subject to the achievement of specified performance objectives over the remaining three open segments of the 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle. Shares earned during any segment of the 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycle will remain unvested until the completion of the full three-year cycle.

(8)This award vests on April 13, 2017.
(9)This award vests on April 6, 2018.3, 2020.

(10)This award vests on July 17, 2018.November 1, 2o20.
(11)This award vests on March 31, 2016.
(12)This award vests on April 13, 2017.
(13)This award vests on January 2, 2017.
(14)This award vests on June 13, 2016.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  71


60

 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 


Option Exercises and2017 Stock Vested

The following table provides information regarding stock vested during 20152017 for each of our NEOs. NoNone of our NEOs hold options orand no SSARs were exercised by our NEOs during 2015.

2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
  Stock Awards
Name Type of Award(1) 
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
 
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
Andreas Fibig RSU(2)1,655
 194,330
  RSU(3)1,145
 129,030
  PRS(4)(5)6,373
 745,450
  2013 LTIP(6)6,114
 731,479
       
Alison A. Cornell 2013 LTIP(6)495
 67,617
       
Richard O’Leary PRS(4)(5)7,948
 689,688
  2013 LTIP(6)1,570
 187,835
       
Nicolas Mirzayantz PRS(4)(5)19,870
 1,724,219
  2013 LTIP(6)4,851
 580,374
       
Matthias Haeni PRS(4)(5)4,912
 426,239
  2013 LTIP(6)1,822
 217,984
       
Anne Chwat RSU(7)250
 27,160
  PRS(4)(5)13,909
 1,206,953
  2013 LTIP(6)3,006
 359,638
_______________________
2017.

      Stock Awards

Name

   

 Type of Award (1)  

 Number of
 Shares Acquired    
on Vesting (#)
  

Value Realized    
     on Vesting ($)    

Andreas Fibig

  RSU (2)  7,967    1,051,166  
   2015 LTIP (3)  12,022    1,834,677  

Richard O’Leary

  PRS (2)(4)  2,749    353,711  
   RSU (5)  1,487    120,926  
   2015 LTIP (3)  1,176    179,469  

Nicolas Mirzayantz

  PRS (2)(4)  7,943    1,047,999  
   2015 LTIP (3)  3,006    458,746  

Matthias Haeni

  PRS (2)(4)  3,666    483,692  
   2015 LTIP (3)  3,006    458,746  

Anne Chwat

  PRS (2)(4)  5,499    725,538  
    2015 LTIP (3)  1,679    256,232  

(1)RSU = Restricted Stock Unit
PRS = Purchased Restricted Stock
2013 LTIP = 2013-2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle
PRS = Purchased Restricted Stock
2015 LTIP = 2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle

(2)The award represented in this row was granted in 2012 to Mr. Fibig while he was a member of2014 under the Board of DirectorsECP and vested on May 1, 2015.April 13, 2017. The value realized is based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date ($117.42)131.94).

(3)The award represented in this row is the equity portion of the 2015-2017 LTIP award, for which performance was grantedcompleted on December 31, 2017. The number of shares represents the actual number of shares that will be issued to the participant in 2014 to Mr. Fibig while he was a member ofMarch 2018, as determined by the Board of Directors and vested on May 13, 2015.in February 2018. The value realized is based on the number of shares and the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 29, 2017 ($152.61); however, the actual value realized may vary depending on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the vesting date ($112.69).payout date.

(4)The award represented in this row was granted in 2012 under the ECP and vested on April 1, 2015. The value realized is based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date ($116.97).
(5)The amounts set forth in this table as the value realized attributable to vested PRS is the product of (a) the number of vested shares of PRS and (b) the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date, less the aggregate amount paid by the executive to purchase the PRS. Without taking into account the amount paid by the respective executive for his or her PRS shares, the value realized on vesting in the Value Realized on Vesting column attributable to PRS for this executive would be: Mr. Fibig - $745,450; Mr. O’Leary - $929,678; Mr. Mirzayantz - $2,324,194; Mr. Haeni - $574,557; and Ms. Chwat - $1,626,936.date.

(6)(5)The award represented in this row is the equity portion of the 2013-2015 LTIP award, for which performance was completedgranted in 2015 to Mr. O’Leary and vested on December 31, 2015. The number of shares represents the actual number of shares that will be issued to the participant in March 2016, as determined by the Board of Directors in February 2016. The value realized is based on the number of shares and the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2015 ($119.64); however, the actual value realized may vary depending on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the payout date.
(7)This award represents a special recognition award of RSUs to Ms. Chwat in connection with the Aromor acquisition.January 3, 2017. The value realized is based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date of February 2, 2015 ($106.78)117.17).

72IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Pension Benefits

We provide a defined benefit pension plan (the “U.S. Pension Plan”) to eligible United States-based employees hired before January 1, 2006. Of our NEOs, only Mr. Mirzayantz currently participates in the U.S. Pension Plan. U.S. employees hired on or after January 1, 2006, including all of our other NEOs, are not eligible to participate in the U.S. Pension Plan. We pay the full cost of providing benefits under the U.S. Pension Plan.


61


Compensation and service earned after December 31, 2007 are not taken into account in determining an employee’s benefit under the U.S. Pension Plan except for employees whose combined age and years of service equaled or exceeded 70 as of December 31, 2007. As Mr. Mirzayantz did not satisfy this requirement, Mr. Mirzayantz had his benefit frozen as of December 31, 2007.

The monthly pension benefit is equal to the number of years of credited service as of December 31, 20152017 times the difference between (a) 1.7% times final average compensation, and (b) 1.25% times the social security amount. Final average compensation for purposes of the U.S. Pension Plan is the average of the five consecutive years of compensation during the last ten years before December 31, 2007 that produce the highest average. The term “compensation” means the basic rate of monthly salary (as of April 1 each year) plus 1/12 of any AIP cash award received for the preceding year, reduced by any compensation deferred under our DCP. The normal retirement age under the U.S. Pension Plan is age 65.

Various provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“IRC”) limit the amount of compensation used in determining benefits payable under our U.S. Pension Plan. We established anon-qualified Supplemental Retirement Plan to pay that part of the pension benefit that, because of these IRC limitations, cannot be paid under the U.S. Pension Plan to our U.S. senior executives. For purposes of the Supplemental Retirement Plan, “compensation” includes any salary and AIP amounts, including amounts deferred under our DCP.

Employees with at least 10 years of service are eligible for early retirement under the U.S. Pension Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Plan beginning at age 55. The benefit at early retirement is an unreduced benefit payable at age 62 or a reduced benefit (4% per year) if paid prior to age 62.

The following table provides information for Mr. Mirzayantz regarding our U.S. Pension Plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan. The present value of accumulated benefits payable under each of our retirement plans was determined using the following assumptions: an interest rate of 4.1%; theRP-2000 Healthy Participant Male/Female Mortality with projections of mortality improvements; 80% of participants are married with a spouse four years younger and are receiving a 50% joint and survivor annuity and 20% of participants are unmarried and are receiving a straight life annuity with a five-year guarantee. Additional information regarding the valuation method and material assumptions used to determine the accumulated benefits reported in the table is presented in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 20152017 Annual Report. The information provided in the columns other than the Payments During Last Fiscal Year column is presented as of December 31, 2015,2017, the measurement date used for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  73


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Pension Benefits

Name Plan Name 
Number
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)
 
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits
Assuming
Retirement
Age of 62
($)(1)
 
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits
Assuming
Retirement
Age of 65
($)(2)
 
Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year ($)
Nicolas Mirzayantz (3) U.S. Pension Plan 16.23
 542,078
 450,062
 
  Supplemental Retirement Plan 16.23
 863,751
 717,132
 
      1,405,829
 1,167,194
 
_____________________

Name

 

Plan Name

 Number
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)
  Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits
Assuming
Retirement
Age of 62
($)(1)
  Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits
Assuming
Retirement
Age of 65
($)(2)
  Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year ($)
 

Nicolas Mirzayantz (3)

 U.S. Pension Plan  16.23   634,273   531,657   —   
  Supplemental Retirement Plan  16.23   1,010,655   847,146   —   
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
         1,644,928   1,378,803   —   

(1)The amounts in this column assume benefit commencement at unreduced early retirement at age 62 (with at least 10 years of credited service) and otherwise were determined using interest rate, mortality and payment distribution assumptions consistent with those used in our financial statements.

(2)The amounts in this column assume benefit commencement at normal retirement at age 65 and otherwise were determined using interest rate, mortality and payment distribution assumptions consistent with those used in our financial statements.

(3)Benefits for Mr. Mirzayantz under the U.S. Pension Plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan were frozen as of December 31, 2007 because his age and service as of December 31, 2007 did not equal or exceed 70.

62


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

We offer our executive officersexecutives and other senior employees based in the United States an opportunity to defer compensation under ournon-qualified deferred compensation plan, or DCP. The DCP allows these employees to defer salary, annual and long-term incentive awards and receipt of stock under some equity awards. There is no limit on the amount of compensation that a participant may elect to defer. Subject to certain limitations on the number of installments and periods over which installments will be paid, participants in the DCP elect the timing and number of installments as to which the participant’s DCP account will be settled. Deferred cash compensation may be treated at the election of the participant as invested in (i) in:

a variety of equity and debt mutual funds offered by The Vanguard Group, which administers the DCP, or (ii)

a fund valued by reference to the value of our common stock with dividends reinvested (the “IFF Stock Fund”), or (iii)

an interest-bearing account.

Except for deferrals into the IFF Stock Fund, the participant may generally change his or her choice of funds at any time. For the interest-bearing account, our Compensation Committee establishes an interest rate each year which we intend to be equal to 120% of the applicable federal long-term interest rate. For 20152017 this interest rate was 3.25%2.69% and for 20162018 this interest rate is 3.10%3.13%.

We make matching contributions under the DCP to make up for tax limitations on our matching contributions under our Retirement Investment Fund Plan, a 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan provides for matching contributions at a rate of $1.00 for each dollar of contribution up to 4% of a participant’s salary plus $0.75 for each dollar of contribution above 4% up to 8% of a participant’s salary.

Tax rules limit the amount of the Company match under the 401(k) plan for our senior executives. The DCP matching contribution reflects the amount of the matching contribution which is limited by the tax laws. The same requirements under the 401(k) plan for matching, including vesting, apply to matching

74IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

contributions under the DCP. These matching contributions automatically vest once a participant completes three years of service with our Company.

The DCP gives participants an incentive to defer compensation into the IFF Stock Fund by granting a 25% premium, credited in additional deferred stock, on all cash compensation deferred into the stock fund contingent upon the participant remaining employed by the Company (other than for retirement) for the full calendar year following the year when such credit was made. If the participant withdraws any deferred stock within one year of a deferral, any premium shares credited will be forfeited. Vesting of the premium deferred stock accelerates upon a change in control. RSUs granted under our equity compensation plans may also be deferred upon vesting, but no premium is added.

The following table provides information for our NEOs regarding participation in our DCP.

2015

2017Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

Name 
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY ($)
 
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
 
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
FY ($)
 
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions ($)
 
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(2)
Andreas Fibig 194,330
 
 49,952
 
 754,171
Alison A. Cornell 81,667
(3)
 84
 
 81,803
Richard O’Leary 
 
 21,369
 
 129,646
Nicolas Mirzayantz 217,562
(4)37,201
 52,608
 
 1,678,204
Matthias Haeni 
 
 
 
 
Anne Chwat 210,394
(5)40,977
 155,507
 
 1,684,961
____________________

Name  

Executive

Contributions in
Last FY ($)

  

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY
($)(1)

   

Aggregate

Earnings in

Last FY
($)

   

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions
($)

   

Aggregate

 Balance at 

 Last FYE 
($)(2)

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Andreas Fibig

   1,251,120 (3)   355,793     —     —     2,957,693  

Richard O’Leary

   85,000 (4)   41,302     —     —     309,841  

Nicolas Mirzayantz

   149,291 (5)   38,796     406,223     —     2,469,915  

Matthias Haeni

   —    —     —     —     —  

Anne Chwat

   453,493 (6)   85,305     281,213     296,174     2,562,201  

(1)The amounts in this column are included in the All Other Compensation column for 20152017 in the Summary Compensation Table, and represent employer contributions credited to the participant’s account during 2015,2017, as well as certain contributions credited in the first quarter of 20162018 related to compensation earned in 2015.2017.

63


(2)If a person was a NEO in previous years’ proxy statements, this amount includes amounts that were included as compensation previously reported for that person in the Summary Compensation Table for those previous years. Of the totals in this column, the following amounts were reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2006: Mr. Mirzayantz $87,985; for 2007: Mr. Mirzayantz $160,010; for 2008: Mr. Mirzayantz $63,269; for 2009: Mr. Mirzayantz  $31,228; for 2010: Mr. Mirzayantz $243,228; for 2011: Mr. Mirzayantz $45,600; Ms. Chwat  $316,928; for 2012: Mr. Mirzayantz $516,144; Ms. Chwat $398,970; for 2013: Mr. Mirzayantz  $751,443; Ms. Chwat $509,236; and for 2014: Mr. Fibig $443,624; Mr. O'Leary –O’Leary — $161,002; Mr. Mirzayantz  $500,852; Ms. Chwat – $305,561.— $305,561; for 2015: Mr. Fibig — $631,680; Mr. O’Leary — $115,933; Mr. Mirzayantz — $255,521; Ms. Chwat — $182,715; and for 2016: Mr. Fibig — $1,251,120; Mr. O’Leary — $85,000; Mr. Mirzayantz — $149,291; Ms. Chwat — $453,493.

(3)Of this amount, $117,000 is included in the Salary column for 2017 in the Summary Compensation Table and $1,134,120 is included as a portion of his 2017 AIP award in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)(4)This amount is included in the Salary column for 20152017 in the Summary Compensation Table.

(4)(5)Of this amount, $58,500$48,000 is included in the Salary column for 20152017 in the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Mirzayantz also deferred $159,062$26,891 of the cash portion of his 2014-2016 LTIP and $74,400 which is a portion of his 2017 AIP and was included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column for 20142017 in the Summary Compensation Table.

(5)(6)Of this amount, $139,500$237,500 is included in the Salary column for 20152017 in the Summary Compensation Table. Ms. Chwat also deferred $70,894$45,015 of the cash portion of the 2014-2016 LTIP, $67,381 of the share portion of the 2014-2016 LTIP and $103,598 which is a portion of her 2017 AIP and was included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column for 20142017 in the Summary Compensation Table.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  75


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Potential Payments upon Termination and Change in Control
Arrangements

Executive Severance Policy

We currently provide

Our ESP provides severance payments and benefits to our NEOs and other senior executives in the event of a termination of their employment in certain specified circumstances. In addition, under our ESP.incentive plans, the vesting of equity awards may also be accelerated in connection with certain terminations. The level of severance pay under the ESP is based on a tier system. Each executive'sexecutive’s assigned tier is based on the executive'sexecutive’s grade level. The Compensation Committee may also agree to provide enhanced severance payments and benefits to specific executives. All our NEOs are in Tier I other thanI. Mr. O’Leary, who is in Tier II. Our ESP was last modified in March 2015 to conform to the 2015 SAIP, including to streamline the Change in Control provisions, to clarify the clawback provisions and severance rights, and to modify the non-compete provisions. Mr. Fibig'sFibig’s offer letter has modified some of the relevant definitions, amounts and other terms regarding the benefits that he is eligible to receive under the ESP. See “Other Separation Arrangements - Mr. Fibig”Arrangements” below for a discussion of Mr. Fibig’s benefits.

Our ESP provides for acceleration of equity, severance payments and continuation of benefits in connection with an executive’s termination (1) if his or her employment is terminated by us without Cause or (2) in the case that such termination occurs within two years of a Change in Control, if his or her employment is terminated without Cause or he or she terminates his or her employment for Good Reason. In addition, a Tier I executive is eligible to receive payments if he or she terminates his or her employment for Good Reason prior to or more than two years after a Change in Control.

Our ESP states that a “Change in Control” (or “CiC”) will be deemed to have occurred when any of the following has occurred:

(i)

a person or group becomes the beneficial owner of 40% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding voting securities, other than beneficial ownership by us, any of our employee benefit plans or any person organized, appointed or established pursuant to the terms of any such benefit plan;
(ii)individuals who, at March 9, 2015, constituted a majority of the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease to constitute a majority of the Board for any reason; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to March 9, 2015 whose election or nomination for election to the Board was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board shall be an Incumbent Director; or
(iii)the consummation of (A) a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction with us or in which our securities are issued, as a result of which the holders of our outstanding voting securities immediately before such event own, directly or indirectly, immediately after such event less than 60% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the parent entity resulting from, or issuing its voting securities as part of, such event; (B) our complete liquidation or dissolution; or (C) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets to any person.

64

Table of Contents40% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding voting securities, other than beneficial ownership by us, any of our employee benefit plans or any person organized, appointed or established pursuant to the terms of any such benefit plan;

the directors of the Board as of November 1, 2017 (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease to constitute a majority of the Board for any reason; provided, however, that (i) any individual becoming a director subsequent to November 1, 2017 whose election or nomination for election to the Board was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board shall be an Incumbent Director and (ii) any individual initially elected or nominated as a director as a result of an actual or threatened election contest shall not be an Incumbent Director; or

the consummation of (A) a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction with us or in which our securities are issued, as a result of which the holders of our outstanding voting securities immediately before such event own, directly or indirectly, immediately after such event less than 60% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the parent entity resulting from, or issuing its voting securities as part of, such event; (B) a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or (C) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets to any person, with certain exceptions.

76IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Severance Payments and Benefits Other than in Connection with a Change in Control

Payment for Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason.  Pursuant to our ESP, any coveredTier 1 executive that is terminated by us without Cause or by a Tier 1 executive for Good Reason prior to or more than two years after a CiC is entitled to receive the following:

A severance payment equal to (a) two times (2x) in case of our CEO, or (b) one andone-half
(i)A severance payment equal to (a) one and a half times (1.5x) in case of our Tier I executives, and (b) one times (1x) in case of our Tier II executives, the sum of the executive's annual base salary at the date of termination plus the prorated portion of the executive's times (1.5x) in case of our other Tier I executives, the sum of the executive’s annual base salary at the date of termination plus the prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs (payable to the Tier I or Tier II executive in regular installments over 18 or 12 months, respectively, following termination);
(ii)A prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable when such AIP amounts otherwise become payable;
(iii)A prorated portion of the executive’s target LTIP award for the cycles then in progress, payable when such LTIP amounts otherwise become payable;
(iv)Vesting of a prorated portion of any unvested equity award(s); and
(v)Continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 18 months years in the case of our Tier I executives and 12 months for Tier II executives or until the executive obtains new employment providing similar benefits or attains age 65.
Payment for Termination With Good Reason. Pursuant to the ESP, if aexecutive in regular installments over 24 months for our CEO, or 18 months for other Tier I employee terminates hisexecutives, following termination);

A prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable when such AIP amounts otherwise become payable;

A prorated portion of the executive’s target LTIP award for the cycles then in progress, payable when such LTIP amounts otherwise become payable;

Vesting of a prorated portion of any unvested equity award(s), settled on the applicable vesting date as if termination had not occurred; and

Continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 24 months for our CEO and 18 months for our other Tier I executives, or heruntil the executive obtains new employment for Good Reason prior toproviding similar benefits or more than two years after a CiC, than he or she is entitled to receive the same benefits as set forth above for “Termination Without Cause.”attains age 65.

Severance Payments and Benefits in Connection with a Change in Control

Upon the occurrence of a termination of any Tier 1 executive by us without Cause or by an executive for Good Reason within two years following a CiC, the executive would be entitled to the following:

(i)A severance payment equal to two times (2x)

A severance payment equal to (a) three times (3x) in case of our Tier I executives, and one and a half times (1.5x) in case of our Tier II executives, the sum of the executive’s annual base salary at the date of termination plus the higher of (x) his or her average AIP award for the three most recent years and (y) his or her target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;
(ii)A prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;
(iii)For each performance segment that ended prior to the termination, a payment equal to the LTIP award payment the executive would have been entitled to receive for such performance segment had the termination not occurred, payable in a lump sum;
(iv)For each performance segment in which the executive’s date of termination occurs, a prorated portion of the executive’s target LTIP award for each performance segment in which the termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;
(v)Vesting of any equity awards not already vested upon the CiC and, unless deferred by the executive, settlement of such equity awards;
(vi)Vesting of any benefits under our Supplemental Retirement Plan; and
(vii)Continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 18 months for our Tier I executives, and 12 months for our Tier II executives or until the executive obtains new employment providing similar benefits or attains age 65.

65

Table of Contentsour CEO, or (b) two times (2x) in case of our other Tier I executives, the sum of the executive’s annual base salary at the date of termination plus the higher of (1) his or her average AIP award for the three most recent years and (2) his or her target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;

A prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;

For each performance segment that ended prior to the termination, a payment equal to the LTIP award payment the executive would have been entitled to receive for such performance segment had the termination not occurred, payable in a lump sum;

For each performance segment in which the executive’s date of termination occurs, a prorated portion of the executive’s target LTIP award for each performance segment in which the termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;

Vesting of any equity awards not already vested upon the CiC and, unless deferred by the executive, settlement of such equity awards;

Vesting of any benefits under our Supplemental Retirement Plan; and

Continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 24 months for our CEO, and 18 months for our other Tier I executives, or until the executive obtains new employment providing similar benefits or attains age 65.

Definitions.IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  77


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Definitions.Our ESP defines Cause and Good Reason as follows:

“Cause” means:
"Cause" means (i) failure of the executive to perform his or her material duties in any material respect, which if reasonably susceptible to cure, has continued after written notice of such failure has been provided and the executive has not cured such failure within 10 days of receipt of such written notice; (ii) willful misconduct or gross negligence by the executive that has caused or is reasonably expected to result in material injury to our business, reputation, or prospects; (iii) the engagement by the executive in illegal conduct or any act of serious dishonesty which could reasonably be expected to result in material injury to our business or reputation or which adversely affects the executive’s ability to perform his or her duties; (iv) the executive being indicted or convicted of (or having pled guilty or nolo contendere to) a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, theft or financial impropriety; or (v) a material and willful violation by the executive of our rules, policies or procedures.

failure of the executive to perform his or her material duties in any material respect, which if reasonably susceptible to cure, has continued after written notice of such failure has been provided and the executive has not cured such failure within 10 days of receipt of such written notice;

willful misconduct or gross negligence by the executive that has caused or is reasonably expected to result in material injury to our business, reputation, or prospects;

the engagement by the executive in illegal conduct or any act of serious dishonesty which could reasonably be expected to result in material injury to our business or reputation or which adversely affects the executive’s ability to perform his or her duties;

the executive being indicted or convicted of (or having pled guilty or nolo contendere to) a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, theft or financial impropriety; or

a material and willful violation by the executive of our rules, policies or procedures.

“Good Reason” means any of the following: (i) a material decrease in the executive’s base salary, target bonus under an AIP, LTIP or Equity Choice Award, other than as part of an across-the-board reduction applicable to all similarly situated employees; (ii) a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities; (iii) relocation of executive’s primary work location more than 50 miles from executive’s primary work location at the time of such requested relocation; or (iv) our failure to obtain the binding agreement of any successor expressly to assume and agree to fully perform our obligations under the ESP.

a material decrease in the executive’s base salary, target bonus under an AIP, LTIP or Equity Choice Award, other than as part of anacross-the-board reduction applicable to all similarly situated employees;

a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities;

relocation of executive’s primary work location more than 50 miles from executive’s primary work location at the time of such requested relocation; or

our failure to obtain the binding agreement of any successor expressly to assume and agree to fully perform our obligations under the ESP.

However, “good reason” will only exist if the executive gives us notice within 90 days after the initial occurrence of any of the foregoing events and we fail to correct the matter within 30 days following receipt of such notice.

TaxTax Gross-Up. Executives are not entitled to receive a tax “gross-up”“gross-up” payment. Instead, their severance payments would be subject to a “modifiedcut-back” provision, where severance or other payments to that executive would be reduced if this reduction would produce a betterafter-tax result for the executive. There would be no reduction, however, if the executive (who would be responsible for any excise tax) would have a betterafter-tax result without the reduction.

Participant Obligations for the Protection of Our Business and Clawback.As a condition of the executive’s right to receive severance payments and benefits, the ESP requires that he or she (i) she:

not compete with us, (ii)

not solicit, induce, divert, employ, retain or interfere with or attempt to influence our relationship with any employee or person providing services to the Company and (iii)

78IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

not interfere with or attempt to influence our relationship with any supplier, customer or other person with whom we do business.

These restrictions apply while an executive is employed and following a termination of employment during the period of 12 months in case of non-compete obligations and 24 months in case ofnon-solicitation obligations. In addition, executives are not entitled to severance if they engage in willful misconduct or a violation of a Company policy that is materially detrimental to us while employed by the Company. The ESP also conditions severance payments and benefits on the executive signing a release and termination agreement, and meeting continuing commitments relating to confidentiality, cooperation in litigation and return of our property.

As discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Analysis—Clawback Policy,” compensation received under our ESP is subject to our clawback policy if the executive breaches the obligations noted above or if any of the other events triggering a clawback, such as a financial misstatement or restatement, occur.

Effect of IRC Section 409A.The timing of some payments and benefits may be restricted under IRC Section 409A, which regulates deferred compensation. Some amounts payable to our NEOs or other participants under the ESP upon termination may be delayed until six months after termination.

Payments in connection with death, disability or retirement.Our executives may also receive payment if their employment terminates as a result of death, disability or retirement as set forth in the terms and conditions of their award agreements with the Company and, in the case of our CEO, his letter agreement as described below under “Other Separation Arrangements - Arrangements—Mr. Fibig.” Our NEOs are also entitled to payments under our Executive Death Benefit Plan as described in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Analysis—Executive Death Benefit Plan.” In the event of disability, our NEOs would be entitled to payments under our Disability Insurance Program that applies to salaried employees generally (60% of monthly salary up to a maximum of $15,000 per month).


66


Other Separation Arrangements

Mr. Fibig

Details regarding Mr. Fibig’s letter agreement dated May 26, 2014 are included in this proxy statement under the heading “Employment Agreements or Arrangements” following the Summary Compensation Table. Under the terms of his letter agreement, Mr. Fibig is a participant in our ESP and is entitled to receive the benefits set forth for Tier I executivesabove, with the following modifications:

In connection with any termination without Cause or for Good Reason, not in connection with a CiC:

(i)In connection with any termination without Cause or for Good Reason, not in connection with a CiC:
a.Mr. Fibig’s severance payment will be a multiple of two times (2x) the sum of his annual base salary plus the average AIP bonus paid to him in the three years prior to termination, payable over 24 months; and

b.Mr. Fibig will be entitled to receive a pro-ratedprorated portion of any LTIP award that is in progress on the date of termination, based on target, in alump-sum cash payment.payment; and
(ii)Mr. Fibig’s severance payment in connection with any termination without Cause or for Good Reason that occurs within two years after a CiC will be a multiple of three times (3x) the sum of his annual base salary plus the greater of his (a) target AIP award for the year of termination and (b) the average AIP award paid to him for the three fiscal years prior to the termination, and such payments will be payable in a lump sum. In addition, all of Mr. Fibig's outstanding equity awards will vest in full at target;
(iii)Mr. Fibig will be entitled to continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 24 months in the case of termination without Cause or for Good Reason, whether or not in connection with a CiC.

In connection with any termination without Cause or for Good Reason that occurs within two years after a CiC, all of Mr. Fibig’s outstanding equity awards will vest in full at target;

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  79


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Any termination by us without cause (as described below) or by Mr. Fibig for any reason requires prior written notice of (i) six months, if the termination occurs on or after the first anniversary but before the second anniversary of his date of employment, or (ii) 90 days, if the termination occurs on or after the second anniversary of his date of employment.

days. Under Mr. Fibig’s letter agreement, “Cause” means (i) means:

willful and continued failure to perform substantially his duties with the Company (other than any such failure resulting from his incapacity due to physical or mental illness) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to him by the Board which specifically identifies the manner in which he has not substantially performed his duties, and which provides a 20 day20-day cure period; (ii)

willful engagement in conduct which is not authorized by the Board or within the normal course of his business decisions and is known by him to be materially detrimental to our best interests or the best interests of any of our subsidiaries, including any misconduct that results in material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the Federal securities laws if such noncompliance results in an accounting restatement; (iii)

willful engagement in illegal conduct or any act of serious dishonesty which adversely affects, or in the reasonable estimation of the Board, could in the future adversely affect his value, reliability or performance to our Company in a material manner (other than any act or failure to act based upon authority given by the Board or advice of counsel for the Company, which shall be presumed to be done in good faith and in the best interests of the Company); or (iv)

his being indicted for or convicted of (or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to) a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, theft or financial impropriety.

Under Mr. Fibig’s letter agreement, “Good Reason” means any of the following (i) following:

any reduction in his base salary or target AIP bonus; (ii)

an adverse change in his status or position as CEO (including as a result of a material diminution in his duties or responsibilities); (iii)

required relocation to a principal place of employment outside of the New York City metropolitan area; or (iv)

our failure to obtain an agreement from any successor to all or substantially all of our assets or business to assume and agree to perform his Employment Agreement within fifteen (15)15 days after a merger, consolidation, sale or similar transaction.

However, “Good Reason” will only exist if the CEO resigns from employment within 180 days after the occurrence, without his express written consent, of one of the events enumerated in (i) - (iv)listed above; provided he providegives written notice within 90 days after the event allegedly constituting Good Reason, and the Company will have 30 days after such notice is given to cure.


67


If Mr. Fibig’s employment terminates on account of death, disability or retirement, he (or his beneficiary or estate) is entitled to any unpaid base salary through the date of termination, any unpaid bonus earned with respect to any fiscal year ending on or preceding the date of termination, payable when bonuses are paid to other senior executives, apro-rata AIP bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, based on actual performance and payable when bonuses are paid to other senior executives, and all other payments, benefits or perquisites to which he may be entitled under the terms of the Company’s programs. Mr. Fibig will not be entitled to any payment (including any taxgross-up) respecting taxes he may owe under IRC Section 4999 (so-called(so-called “golden parachute taxes”). The separation benefits payments are subject to Mr. Fibig’s delivery to us of an executed general release, resignation from all offices, directorships and fiduciary positions with us and continued compliance with restrictive covenants regardingnon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality, cooperation andnon-disparagement. Upon a termination of Mr. Fibig’s employment for any reason, thenon-competition andnon-solicitation covenants continue to apply for two years. If Mr. Fibig’s employment terminates prior to a CiC and he fails to comply with the restrictive covenants, the clawback provisions in the ESP apply.

80IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Potential Payments and Benefits upon aTermination or Change in Control and Various Types of Terminations

The following table shows the estimated payments and value of benefits that we would provide to each of our NEOs if the triggering events described in the heading of the table had occurred on December 31, 2015.

2017.

We do not provide any additional benefits to our NEOs upon a voluntary resignation or termination for Cause. Certain assumptions made for purposes of presenting this information and certain amounts not reflected in the table are explained below or in the footnotes to the table.

For all cases, theper-share market price of our common stock is assumed to be $119.64,$152.61, the actual closing price per share on the last trading day of the year, December 31, 2015.2017. In preparing the estimates in this table, we have assumed that any CiC would also constitute a “change in ownership and control” for purposes of the golden parachute excise tax rules. All amounts included in the table are stated in the aggregate, even if the payments will be made on a monthly basis. Except as noted in footnote (7) of the table, these amounts do not include payments and benefits to the extent that they are provided on anon-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. The salary, AIP award and LTIP award otherwise payable to each NEO through December 31, 20152017 is included in the Summary Compensation Table. In addition to the amounts set forth in the table below, in the event of a CiC, the aggregate balance held in our DCP for each of our NEOs who participate in that plan will be automatically accelerated and settled within five business days of the CiC, as opposed to the participant’s original deferral election. The amounts that would have been accelerated in the event of a CiC as well as, in all other cases, the amounts each of our NEOs who participate in that plan would have received according to the participant’s original deferral election, are shown in the Aggregate Balance at FiscalYear-End column of theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  81



68



 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

   Involuntary
Termination
Not for Cause
or for Good
Reason Prior
to or More
Than 2 Years
After a CiC
  Termination
due to Death
(1)
  Separation
Due to
Retirement or
Disability
Prior to or
More Than 2
Years After a
CiC (2)
  Involuntary
Termination
Not for Cause
or for Good
Reason
Within 2
Years After a
CiC
  Separation
Due to
Retirement or
Disability
Within 2
Years After a
CiC (2)
 

Andreas Fibig

      

Salary

 $2,600,000    $—    $—    $3,900,000  (3)  $—   

AIP

  3,120,000  (4)   —     —     4,680,000  (5)   —   

LTIP (6)

  922,557     922,557     922,557     922,557     922,557   

Equity (7)

  5,877,465     10,436,387   —     10,436,387     10,436,387   

Medical Benefits (8)

  51,808     —     —     51,808     —   

Executive Death Benefit (9)

  —     2,600,000     —     —     —   

Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)

  2,373     —     —     7,798     —   

Disability Insurance (11)

  —     —     180,000     —     180,000   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $12,574,203    $13,958,944    $1,102,557    $19,998,550    $11,538,944   

Richard O’Leary

      

Salary

 $750,000    $—    $—    $1,000,000    $—   

AIP

  600,000  (4)   —     —     800,000  (5)   —   

LTIP (6)

  142,199     142,199     142,199     142,199     142,199   

Equity (7)

  2,033,655     2,656,718     —     2,656,718     2,656,718   

Medical Benefits (8)

  44,804     —     —     44,804     —   

Executive Death Benefit (9)

  —     1,000,000     —     —     —   

Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)

  9,109     —     —     18,671     —   

Disability Insurance (11)

  —     —     180,000     —     180,000   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $3,579,767    $3,798,917    $322,199    $4,662,392    $2,978,917   

Nicolas Mirzayantz

      

Salary

 $900,000    $—    $—    $1,200,000    $—   

AIP

  720,000  (4)   —     —     960,000  (5)   —   

LTIP (6)

  230,639     230,639     230,639     230,639     230,639   

Equity (7)

  2,028,575     3,164,400     —     3,164,400     3,164,400   

Medical Benefits (8)

  44,804     —     —     44,804     —   

Executive Death Benefit (9)

  —     1,200,000     —     —     —   

Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)

  5,148     —     —     10,749     —   

Disability Insurance (11)

  —     —     180,000     —     180,000   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $3,929,166    $4,595,039    $410,639    $5,610,592    $3,575,039   

Matthias Haeni (12)

      

Salary

 $887,572    $—    $—    $1,183,429    $—   

AIP

  710,057  (4)   —     —     946,743  (5)   —   

LTIP (6)

  230,639     230,639     230,639     230,639     230,639   

Equity (7)

  1,419,451     2,227,985     —     2,227,985     2,227,985   

Medical Benefits (8)

  28,850     —     —     28,850     —   

Executive Death Benefit (9)

  —     1,200,000     —     —     —   

Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)

  7,046     —     —     14,545     —   

Disability Insurance (11)

  —     —     180,000     —     180,000   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $3,283,615    $3,658,624    $410,639    $4,632,191    $2,638,624   

Anne Chwat

      

Salary

 $712,500    $—    $—    $950,000    $—   

AIP

  427,500  (4)   —     —     570,000  (5)   —   

LTIP (6)

  131,464     131,464     131,464     131,464     131,464   

Equity (7)

  1,473,457     2,371,847     —     2,371,847     2,371,847   

Medical Benefits (8)

  44,804     —     —     44,804     —   

Executive Death Benefit (9)

  —     950,000     —     —     —   

Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)

  7,295     —     —     15,043     —   

Disability Insurance (11)

  —     —     180,000     —     180,000   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $2,797,020    $3,453,311    $311,464    $4,083,158    $2,683,311   

82IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 
Involuntary
Termination
Not for
Cause or Good Reason Prior
to or More
Than 2 Years
After a CiC
 
Termination
due to Death(1)
 
Separation
Due to
Retirement
or Disability
Prior to or
More Than
2 Years
After a CiC(2)
 
Not for Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
Within 2 Years
After a CiC
 
Separation
Due to
Retirement or
Disability
Within 2
Years
After a CiC(2)
Andreas Fibig         
Salary$2,400,000
 $
 $
 $3,600,000
(3)$
AIP2,880,000
(4)
 
 4,320,000
(5)
LTIP (6)771,807
 771,807
 771,807
 771,807
 771,807
ECP Acceleration (7)2,018,851
 5,480,589
 
 5,480,589
 5,480,589
Medical Benefits (8)58,990
 
 
 58,990
 
Executive Death Benefit (9)
 2,400,000
 
 
 
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)16,471
 
 
 24,706
 
Disability Insurance (11)
 
 180,000
 
 180,000
Total$8,146,119
 $8,652,396
 $951,807
 $14,256,092
 $6,432,396
Alison A. Cornell         
Salary$840,000
 $
 $
 $1,120,000
 $
AIP325,874
(4)
 
 900,000
(5)
LTIP (6)42,626
 42,626
 42,626
 42,626
 42,626
ECP Acceleration (7)85,756
 357,932
 
 357,932
 357,932
Medical Benefits (8)13,571
 
 
 13,571
 
Executive Death Benefit (9)
 1,120,000
 
 
 
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)339
 
 
 453
 
Disability Insurance (11)
 
 180,000
 
 180,000
Total$1,308,166
 $1,520,558
 $222,626
 $2,434,582
 $580,558
Richard O’Leary         
Salary$400,000
 $
 $
 $600,000
 $
AIP220,603
(4)
 
 330,904
(5)
LTIP (6)86,870
 86,870
 86,870
 86,870
 86,870
ECP Acceleration (7)780,607
 1,296,728
 
 1,296,728
 1,296,728
Medical Benefits (8)29,495
 
 
 29,495
 
Executive Death Benefit (9)
 800,000
 
 
 
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)7,912
 
 
 11,868
 
Disability Insurance (11)
 
 180,000
 
 180,000
Total$1,525,487
 $2,183,598
 $266,870
 $2,355,865
 $1,563,598
Nicolas Mirzayantz         
Salary$900,000
 $
 $
 $1,200,000
 
AIP720,000
(4)
 
 1,120,037
(5)
LTIP (6)263,886
 263,886
 263,886
 263,886
 263,886
ECP Acceleration (7)3,904,113
 5,660,181
 
 5,660,181
 5,660,181
Medical Benefits (8)44,243
 
 
 44,243
 
Executive Death Benefit (9)
 1,200,000
 
 
 
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)8,741
 
 
 11,655
 
Disability Insurance (11)
 
 180,000
 
 180,000
Total$5,840,983
 $7,124,067
 $443,886
 $8,300,002
 $6,104,067


69


 
Involuntary
Termination
Not for
Cause Prior
to or More
Than 2 Years
After a CiC
 
Termination
due to Death(1)
 
Separation
Due to
Retirement
or Disability
Prior to or
More Than
2 Years
After a CiC(2)
 
Not For Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
Within 2 Years
After a CiC
 
Separation
Due to
Retirement or
Disability
Within 2
Years
After a CiC(2)
Matthias Haeni         
Salary$750,000
 $
 $
 $1,000,000
 $
AIP600,000
(4)
 
 800,000
(5)
LTIP (6)263,886
 263,886
 263,886
 263,886
 263,886
ECP Acceleration (7)902,800
 1,505,084
 
 1,505,084
 1,505,084
Medical Benefits (8)19,647
 
 
 19,647
 
Executive Death Benefit (9)
 1,000,000
 
 
 
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)339
 
 
 453
 
Disability Insurance (11)
   180,000
 
 180,000
Total$2,536,672
 $2,768,970
 $443,886
 $3,589,070
 $1,948,970
Anne Chwat         
Salary$697,500
 $
 $
 $930,000
 $
AIP418,500
(4)
 
 679,775
(5)
LTIP (6)147,248
 147,248
 147,248
 147,248
 147,248
ECP Acceleration (7)1,393,191
 2,251,503
 
 2,251,503
 2,251,503
Medical Benefits (8)44,243
 
 
 44,243
 
Executive Death Benefit (9)
 930,000
 
 
 
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)11,984
 
 
 17,976
 
Disability Insurance (11)
 
 180,000
 
 180,000
Total$2,712,666
 $3,328,751
 $327,248
 $4,070,745
 $2,578,751
_____________________

 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

(1)The amounts in this column represent payments made in the event of the death of the executive either prior to, within two years or more than two years after a CiC, assuming a termination date of December 31, 2015.2017. With respect to amounts shown in the AIP row, if the death of an executive occurred within two years of a CiC, this amount may change as it is the prorated amount of the executive'sexecutive’s target bonus in the year of termination.

(2)Pursuant to the terms of the ESP, an executive who elects to retire after attaining age 62 is entitled to the benefits in this column (less any disability insurance proceeds).

(3)Pursuant to the terms of our ESP, if severance payments are deemed to trigger the excise tax imposed by IRC Section 4999, the executive would receive the greater net after tax benefit of either (1) payment of the excise tax or (2) a reduction to cash severance to the "safe harbor"“safe harbor” level so as not to trigger the excise tax. In Mr. Fibig'sFibig’s case, payment of the excise tax results in the greater net after tax benefit to him.

(4)This amount represents (i) for Mr. Fibig, 2.0x the greater of the average AIP award paid for performance in the three years preceding the year of the presumed December 31, 20152017 termination (i.e., the three years ending December 31, 2014)2016) (or averaged over the lesser number of years during which the executive was eligible for AIP awards) or the executive'sexecutive’s target annual incentive under the AIP for 2015,2017, prorated for the number of active days of employment with the Company during the performance period; (ii) for Messrs. Mirzayantz, and Haeni and Mses.O’Leary and Ms. Chwat, and Cornell, 1.5x the executive'sexecutive’s target annual incentive under the AIP for 2015 prorated for the number of active days of employment with the Company during the performance period; (iii) for Mr. O'Leary, 1.0x the executive's target annual incentive under the AIP for 20152017 prorated for the number of active days of employment with the Company during the performance period. This amount does not take into account any actual AIP amounts paid for 2015,2017, which are set forth in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(5)For Mr. O'Leary, this amount represents 1.5x, for Messrs. Mirzayantz, and Haeni and Mses.O’Leary and Ms. Chwat and Cornell 2.0x, and Mr. Fibig 3.0x the greater of: (i) the average AIP award paid for performance in the three years preceding the year of the presumed December 31, 20152017 termination (i.e., the three years ending December 31, 2014)2016) (or averaged over the lesser number of years during which the executive was eligible for AIP awards); or (ii) the executive'sexecutive’s target annual incentive under the AIP for 2015.2017. This amount does not take into account any actual AIP amounts paid for 2015,2017, which are set forth in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(6)The amounts in this row are the additional LTIP amounts that would be payable as severance in cash with respect to the 2014-20162016-2018 and 2015-20172017-2019 LTIP cycles, that would be paid in cash, based on prorated target LTIP for the relevant LTIP cycles in progress. Prorated amounts are based on the number of days worked in each performance period divided by the total number of days in each performance period for each relevant LTIP cycle. This amount does not take into account the actual AIP amounts paid out under the completed 2013-20152015-2017 LTIP cycle, which are discussed in the narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Award Table under the heading "Long-Term“Long-Term Incentive Plan."

70



(7)For termination due to involuntary termination not for cause or by the executive for good reason absent a CiC, this amount represents the value of equity that would continue to vest on a prorated basis. For termination due to death or disability more than two years prior to a CiC, the amounts in this row represent the aggregate value of RSU, PRS and PRSPRSU awards which would immediately vest upon occurrence of the termination event. For termination events within two years after a CiC, the amounts in this row represent the aggregatein-the-money value of the options, SSARs, RSUs, PRS, PRSUs and other equity awards which would become vested as a direct result of the CiC before the stated vesting date specified in the applicable equity award document. The calculation of these amounts does not attribute any additional value to options based on their remaining exercise term and does not discount the value of awards based on the portion of the vesting period elapsed at the date of the CiC. These amounts also do not include any value for equity awards that, by their terms, are not accelerated and continue to vest.

(8)

Amounts in this row are the COBRA costs of medical and dental benefits for the covered period based on assumptions used for financial reporting purposes. Although our medical and dental insurance is

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  83


 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

generally available to our employees, only participants in our ESP, including our NEOs, would be entitled to have the benefits paid for by our Company.

(9)The amounts in this row are the amounts that would be payable under our Executive Death Benefit Plan upon the death of the NEO.

(10)The amounts in this row are the costs that we would incur to continue the Executive Death Benefit Plan for the NEO.

(11)The amounts in this row are the amounts that would be payable under our disability insurance program upon the NEO'sNEO’s separation from employment due to long-term disability. This program is generally available to salaried employees.

(12)Effective November 1, 2017, Mr. Haeni relocated to Hilversum, Netherlands and will be compensated in Euros. For purposes of this table, Mr. Haeni’s salary was determined by converting by his Euro salary for the full year at an exchange rate of 1.188 Euros to US Dollars (the exchange rate as of December 29, 2017). All other amounts reflect his compensation in US Dollars without converting them into Euros.

84IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


71

LOGO

TableWhat am I voting on?

At the 2018 Annual Meeting you will be asked to vote on the following proposals. Our Board recommendation for each of Contentsthese proposals is set forth below.

  Proposal

Board
Recommendation

  1. To elect eleven members of the Board of Directors, each to hold office for aone-year term expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

FOR each Director
Nominee

  2.  To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 fiscal year.

FOR

  3.  To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers in 2017, which we refer to as “Say on Pay.”

FOR

We also will consider other business that properly comes before the meeting in accordance with New York law and ourBy-Laws.

Who can vote?

Holders of our common stock at the close of business on March 7, 2018, are entitled to vote their shares at the 2018 Annual Meeting. As of March 7, 2018, there were 78,912,323 shares of common stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock issued and outstanding is entitled to one vote.

What constitutes a quorum, and why is a quorum required?

We are required to have a quorum of shareholders present to conduct business at the meeting. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the record date (39,456,162 shares) will constitute a quorum, permitting us to conduct the business of the meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares of common stock for which we have received executed proxies will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum at the meeting, regardless of how or whether such shares are voted on any specific proposal.

What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “street name” holder?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered a “shareholder of record” or a “registered shareholder” of those shares. In this case, your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) has been sent to you directly by us.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee or custodian (each, a “Broker”), including shares you may own as a participant in one of our 401(k) plans, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, which are held in “street name.” A Notice has been forwarded to you by or on behalf of your Broker, who is considered the shareholder of record of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your Broker how to vote your shares by following the instructions for voting set forth in the Notice.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  85

Information About The Meeting


 INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING 

How do I vote?

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote:

via Internet;

X. OTHER MATTERSby telephone;

by mail, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials; or

in person at the meeting.

Detailed instructions for Internet and telephone voting are set forth in the Notice, which contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement, annual report and shareholder notice online, and the printed proxy card.

If your shares are held in one of our 401(k) plans, your proxy will serve as a voting instruction for the trustee of the 401(k) plan, who will vote your shares as you instruct. To allow sufficient time for the trustee to vote, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 pm Eastern Daylight Time on May 1, 2018. If the trustee does not receive your instructions by that date, the trustee will vote the shares you hold through the 401(k) plan in the same proportion as those shares in the 401(k) plan for which voting instructions were received.

If you are a beneficial owner, you must follow the voting procedures of your Broker.

What are the requirements to elect the director nominees and to approve each of the proposals in this proxy statement?

    Proposal

Vote Required

    1.    Election of Directors

Majority of Votes Cast

    2.    Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Majority of Votes Cast

    3.    Say on Pay

Majority of Votes Cast

Under ourBy-Laws, in an uncontested election of directors, as we have this year, a majority of votes cast is required in order for a director to be elected, which means that a nominee must receive a greater number of votes “FOR” his or her election than votes “AGAINST” in order to be elected. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” a director nominee.

The votes cast “FOR” must exceed the votes cast “AGAINST” the ratification of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 fiscal year. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” this proposal.

Proposal 3 is an advisory vote. This means that while we ask shareholders to approve a resolution regarding Say on Pay, it is not an action that requires shareholder approval. If a majority of votes are cast “FOR” the Say on Pay proposal, we will consider the proposal to be approved. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

What if I am a beneficial owner and I do not give the nominee voting instructions?

If you are a beneficial owner and your shares are held in “street name,” the Broker is bound by the rules of the NYSE regarding whether or not it can exercise discretionary voting power for any particular proposal if the Broker has not received voting instructions from you. Brokers have the authority to vote shares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions on certain routine matters. A brokernon-vote occurs when a Broker returns a proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the Broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the proposal and has not received specific voting instructions

86IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING 

for the proposal from the beneficial owner of the shares. Brokernon-votes are considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but are not counted as votes cast.

The table below sets forth, for each proposal on the ballot, whether a Broker can exercise discretion and vote your shares absent your instructions and, if not, the impact of such brokernon-vote on the approval of the proposal.

    Proposal

Can Brokers
Vote Absent
  Instructions?  
Impact of
Broker
    Non-Vote    

    1.  Election of Directors

No

None

    2. Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

YesNot Applicable

    3. Say on Pay

NoNone

What if I sign and return my proxy without making any selections?

If you sign and return your proxy without making any selections, your shares will be voted “FOR” each of the director nominees and “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3. If other matters properly come before the meeting, the proxy holders will have the authority to vote on those matters for you at their discretion. If your shares are held in “street name,” see the question above on how to vote your shares.

How do I change my vote?

A shareholder of record may revoke his or her proxy by giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary before the meeting, by delivering a later-dated proxy (either in writing, by telephone or over the Internet), or by voting in person at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in “street name,” you may change your vote by following your Broker’s procedures for revoking or changing your proxy.

What shares are covered by my proxy card?

Your proxy reflects all shares owned by you at the close of business on March 7, 2018. For participants in our 401(k) plans, shares held in your account as of that date are included in your proxy.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

If you receive more than one proxy card, it means that you hold shares in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, you should sign and return each proxy card. Alternatively, if you vote by telephone or via the Internet, you will need to vote once for each proxy card and voting instruction card you receive.

Who can attend the 2018 Annual Meeting?

Only shareholders and our invited guests are permitted to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting. To gain admittance, you must bring a form of personal identification to the meeting, where your name will be verified against our record date shareholder list. If a Broker holds your shares and you plan to attend the meeting, you should bring a brokerage statement showing your ownership of the shares as of the record date or a letter from the Broker confirming such ownership, and a form of personal identification. If you wish to vote your shares that are held by a Broker at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy from your Broker and bring such proxy to the meeting.

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  87


 INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING 

If I plan to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting, should I still vote by proxy?

Yes. Casting your vote in advance does not affect your right to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting. If you send in your proxy card and also attend the meeting, you do not need to vote again at the meeting unless you want to change your vote. Written ballots will be available at the 2018 Annual Meeting for shareholders of record.

How can I listen to the live audio webcast of the 2018 Annual Meeting?

You may listen to a live audio webcast of the 2018 Annual Meeting at www.iff.com. The webcast will allow you to listen to the Annual Meeting, but shareholders accessing the 2018 Annual Meeting through the webcast will not be considered present at the 2018 Annual Meeting and will not be able to vote their shares through the webcast or ask questions. If you plan to listen to the live audio webcast, then please submit your vote prior to the 2018 Annual Meeting using one of the methods described under “How do I vote?” above. An archived copy of the webcast will be available at www.iff.com following the 2018 Annual Meeting. Registration to listen to the webcast will be required. We have included our website address for reference only. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

88IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


LOGO

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports with the SEC relating to their common stock ownership and changes in such ownership, and to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on a review of our records and certain written representations received from our executive officers and directors, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders were complied with on a timely basis, except (i) a Form 4 reporting a grant of RSUs to Richard O'Leary was not timely filed due to an administrative error, and (ii) one Form 4 for each of Angelica Cantlon, Anne Chwat, Andreas Fibig, Nicolas Mirzayantz, and Richard O’Leary reporting the grant of stock equivalent units under the Company’s deferred compensation plan was not timely filed due to an administrative error.

basis.

Proxy Solicitation Costs

We will pay the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited on our behalf by directors, officers or employees in person, by telephone, by facsimile or by electronic mail. We have retained Georgeson Inc. to assist in proxy solicitation for a fee of $8,500 plus expenses.We will reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their costs in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our common stock.

Shareholder Proposals

In order for a shareholder proposal or proposed director nomination to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting of shareholders, the Secretary of our Company must receive the written proposal no later than November 17, 2016.19, 2018. Under Article I, Section 3 of ourBy-Laws, in order for a shareholder to submit a proposal or to nominate any director at next year’s annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholder must give written notice to the Secretary of our Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of this year’s annual meeting of shareholders provided next year’s annual meeting is called for on a date that is within 30 days before or after such anniversary date. Assuming that next year’s annual meeting is held on schedule, we must receive written notice of an intention to introduce a nomination or other item of business at that meeting between January 2, 20172019 and February 1, 2017.2019. The notice must also meet all other requirements contained in ourBy-Laws, including the requirement to contain specified information about the proposed business or the director nominee and the shareholder making the proposal.

As of the date of this proxy statement, we do not know of any matters to be presented at the 20162018 Annual Meeting other than those described in this proxy statement. If any other matters should properly come before the meeting, proxies in the enclosed form will be voted on those matters in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies, unless otherwise specified.


72


Shareholder Communications

Shareholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Lead Director, thenon-management directors as a group or all directors as a group may do so by writing to the Lead Director or thenon-management directors or the Board, of Directors, in each case, c/o General Counsel and Secretary, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 521 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019. All communications should include the name, address, telephone number and email address (if any) of the person submitting the communication and indicate whether the person is a shareholder of our Company.

The Board has approved a process for handling correspondence received by our Company on behalf of the Lead Director, thenon-management directors as a group or all directors as a group. Under that process, the General Counsel reviews all such correspondence and maintains a log of, and forwards to the appropriate Board member, correspondence that is relevant to (i) the functions of the Board or

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  89

Other Matters


 OTHER MATTERS 

committees thereof or (ii) other significant matters involving our Company. The General Counsel may screen frivolous or unlawful communications and commercial advertisements. Directors may review the log maintained by the General Counsel at any time.

Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of our internal auditor and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters.

Electronic Delivery

This year we again have elected to take advantage of the SEC’s rule that allows us to furnish proxy materials to you online. We believe electronic delivery will expedite shareholders’ receipt of materials, while lowering costs and reducing the environmental impact of our 20162018 Annual Meeting by reducing printing and mailing of full sets of materials. We mailed the Notice containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and annual report online on or about March 17, 2016.19, 2018. If you would like to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, the Notice contains instructions on how to receive a paper copy.

Householding

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, shareholders of record who have the same address and last name will receive only one copy of our Notice, unless one or more of these shareholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. This procedure will reduce our printing costs and postage fees.

If you are eligible for householding, but you and other shareholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of the Notice, or if you hold stock in more than one account, and in either case you wish to receive only a single copy of the Notice for your household, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, by calling1-800-542-1061, or by forwarding a written request addressed to Broadridge Financial Solutions, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

If you participate in householding and wish to receive a separate copy of the Notice, or if you do not wish to participate in householding and prefer to receive separate copies of the Notice in the future, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions as indicated above. Beneficial shareholders can request information about householding from their nominee.

Available Information

We will furnish without charge to each person whose proxy is being solicited, upon request of any such person, a copy of the 20152017 Annual Report as filed with the SEC, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, but not the exhibits. In addition, such report is available, free of charge, through the Investor - Financials & Filings - SEC Filings link on our website at, www.iff.com.www.iff.com. A request for a copy of such report should be directed to International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 521 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10019, Attention: Investor Relations. A copy of any exhibit to the Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152017 will be forwarded following receipt of a written request to Investor Relations.

90IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT



73

LOGO


Exhibit A
International Flavors and Fragrances Inc.
GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations
(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

REVENUE GROWTH
       
 2013 2014 2015 
Total Company      
   Reported Sales Growth5% 5% -2% 
   Currency Impact0% 0% 7% 
Currency Neutral Sales Growth5% 5% 5% 
       
ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT
       
(IN THOUSANDS U.S. $)2013 2014 2015 
Total Company      
As Reported Operating Profit516,339 592,321 588,347 
   Restructuring and Other Charges7,401 6,398 7,594 
   Operational Improvement Initiative Costs3,672 2,541 1,115 
   Spanish Tax Charges13,011   
   Accelerated Contingent Consideration  7,192 
   Acquisition Related Costs  18,342 
   Spanish Capital Tax Charge Reversal  (10,530) 
Adjusted Operating Profit540,423 601,260 612,060 
ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
       
(IN U.S. $)2013 2014 2015 
Total Company      
As Reported EPS4.29 5.06 5.16 
   Restructuring and Other Charges Tax Benefit0.06 0.05 0.07 
   Operational Improvement Initiative Costs0.03 0.02 0.01 
   Spanish Tax Charges0.19 (0.05)  
   Accelerated Contingent Consideration  0.09 
   Acquisition Related Costs  0.15 
   Tax Settlement  (0.13) 
   Gain on Asset Sale(0.10)   
   Spanish Capital Tax Charge Reversal  (0.09) 
Adjusted EPS
4.461
 5.08 
5.251
 
       
1 The sum of the 2013 and 2015 adjusted EPS does not foot due to rounding.
The Company uses This proxy statement includes the followingnon-GAAP financial measures such asoperating measures: (i) currency neutral sales (which eliminates the effects that result from translating its international sales in U.S. dollars) Adjusted Operating Profit and Adjusted EPSUS Dollars), (ii) currency neutral adjusted operating profit (which excludes the impact of ouroperational improvement initiatives; acquisition related costs; integration related costs; legal charges/credits, net; tax assessment; restructuring and other charges, net; gain on sale of assets; FDA mandated product recall; and UK pension settlement charges), and (iii) currency neutral adjusted earnings per share (which excludes operational improvement initiative costs, and charges, accelerated contingent consideration, Spanish tax charge/reversal, tax settlements, andinitiatives; acquisition related costs)costs; integration related costs; legal charges/credits, net; tax assessment; restructuring and other charges, net; gain on sale of assets; CTA realization, FDA mandated product recall; UK pension settlement charges; and U.S. tax reform charges). In addition, this proxy statement includesnon-GAAP adjusted net income payout as the Company believes thata percentage of adjusted net income (which excludes operational improvement initiatives; acquisition related costs; integration related costs; legal charges/credits, net; tax assessment; restructuring and other charges, net; gain on sale of assets; CTA realization, FDA mandated product recall; UK pension settlement charges; and U.S. tax reform charges).

We have included each of thesenon-GAAP financial measures in order to provide investors with an overall perspective of the period-to-period performance ofadditional information regarding our core business.Company’s underlying operating results and comparable year-over-year performance. Such information is supplemental to information presented in accordance with GAAP and is not intended to represent a presentation in accordance with GAAP. A material limitation of thesenon-GAAP measures is that such measures do not reflect actual GAAP amounts. We compensate for such limitations by using these measures as one of several metrics, including GAAP measures. Thesenon-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Foreign Currency Reconciliation

 
   Sales  Operating
Profit
  EPS 

% Change — As Reported (GAAP)

 

   

 

            9

 

 

  

 

            2

 

 

  

 

            -26

 

 

Items Impacting Comparability

 

   

 

0

 

 

  

 

2

 

 

  

 

32

 

 

% Change — Adjusted(non-GAAP)

 

   

 

9

 

 

  

 

4

 

 

  

 

7

 

 

Currency Impact

 

   

 

0

 

 

  

 

1

 

 

  

 

2

 

 

% Change — Currency Neutral

 

   

 

9

 

 

  

 

5

 

 

  

 

9

 

 

Operating Profit Reconciliation

 

(IN THOUSANDS U.S. $)

  2017  2016 

As Reported Operating Profit (GAAP)

 

   

 

$581,443  

 

 

 

  

 

$567,356  

 

 

 

Operational Improvement Initiatives (a)

 

   

 

1,802  

 

 

 

  

 

2,402  

 

 

 

Acquisition Related Costs (b)

 

   

 

20,389  

 

 

 

  

 

12,195  

 

 

 

Integration Related Costs (c)

 

   

 

4,179  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

Legal Charges/Credits, net (d)

 

   

 

1,000  

 

 

 

  

 

48,518  

 

 

 

Tax Assessment (e)

 

   

 

5,331  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

Restructuring and Other Charges, net (f)

 

   

 

19,711  

 

 

 

  

 

322  

 

 

 

Gain on Sale of Assets (g)

 

   

 

(184)

 

   

 

  

 

(7,818)

 

   

 

FDA Mandated Product Recall (i)

 

   

 

11,000  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

UK Pension Settlement Charges (j)

   

 

2,769  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted Operating Profit (non-GAAP)

           $647,440             $622,975   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  91

ExhibitA-GAAP toNon-GAAP Reconciliations






 EXHIBIT A- GAAP TONON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS 

EPS Reconciliation

 
   2017  2016 

As Reported EPS (GAAP)

 

   

 

$3.72  

 

 

 

  

 

$5.05  

 

 

 

Operational Improvement Initiatives (a)

 

   

 

0.02  

 

 

 

  

 

0.02  

 

 

 

Acquisition Related Costs (b)

 

   

 

0.17  

 

 

 

  

 

0.10  

 

 

 

Integration Related Costs (c)

 

   

 

0.03  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

Legal Charges/Credits, net (d)

 

   

 

0.01  

 

 

 

  

 

0.39  

 

 

 

Tax Assessment (e)

 

   

 

0.04  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

Restructuring and Other Charges, net (f)

 

   

 

0.17  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

Gain on Sale of Assets (g)

 

   

 

—  

 

 

 

  

 

(0.06)

 

   

 

CTA Realization (h)

 

   

 

(0.15)

 

   

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

FDA Mandated Product Recall (i)

 

   

 

0.09  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

UK Pension Settlement Charges (j)

 

   

 

0.03  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

U.S. Tax Reform (k)

 

   

 

1.76  

 

 

 

  

 

—  

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted EPS(non-GAAP)

           $5.89             $5.51 (l) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(a)For 2017 and 2016, represents accelerated depreciation and idle labor costs in Hangzhou, China. For 2016, also includes the partial reversal of severance accruals related to prior year operational initiatives in Europe. There was approximately $0.4 million of idle labor costs in Hangzhou, China recorded during the 2016 that were not excluded from AdjustedNon-GAAP metrics.

(b)For 2017, represents the amortization of inventory“step-up” included in Cost of goods sold and transaction costs related to the acquisitions of Fragrance Resources and PowderPure within Selling and administrative expenses. For 2016, represents the amortization of inventory“step-up” included in Cost of goods sold and transaction costs related to the acquisitions of David Michael within Selling and administrative expenses.

(c)Represents costs related to the integration of the David Michael and Fragrance Resources acquisitions.

(d)Represents additional charge related to litigation settlement.

(e)Represents the reserve for payment of a tax assessment related to commercial rent for prior periods.

(f)Represents severance costs related to the 2017 Productivity Program which were partially offset by the reversal of 2015 severance charges that were no longer needed. For 2016, represents accelerated depreciation related to restructuring initiatives and severance costs related to the termination of a former executive officer and the partial reversal of restructuring accruals recorded in the prior year.

(g)Represents gains on sale of assets. For 2016, assets sold were principally in Brazil. During the first quarter of 2016, we previously recognized approximately $3 million of gains related to the sale of fixed assets. We have not retrospectively adjusted these amounts out of our AdjustedNon-GAAP metrics.

(h)Represents the release of CTA related to the liquidation of a foreign entity.

(i)Represents an estimate of the Company’s incremental direct costs and customer reimbursement obligations, in excess of the Company’s sales value of the recalled products, arising from an FDA mandated recall.

(j)Represents pension settlement charges incurred in one of the Company’s UK pension plans.

(k)Represents charges incurred related to enactment of certain U.S. tax legislation changes in December 2017. The amount includes approximately $38.6 million related to net adjustments on deferred tax assets and $100.6 million related taxes on deemed repatriation of earnings.

(l)The sum of these items does not foot due to rounding.

92IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT


 EXHIBIT A- GAAP TONON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS 

Reconciliation of

Adjusted Net Income / Adjusted Total Payout Ratio as Percentage of Adjusted Net Income

(IN MILLIONS U.S. $)

  

2013

  

2014

 

2015

  

2016

  

2017

 

As Reported Net Income

 

  

 

354

 

  

 

415

 

 

 

419

 

  

 

405

 

  

 

296

 

 

Restructuring and Other Charges

 

  

 

5

 

  

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

  

 

0

 

  

 

14

 

 

Operational Improvement Initiative Costs

 

  

 

3

 

  

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

  

 

2

 

  

 

1

 

 

Patent Litigation Settlement

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

Gain on Asset Sale

 

  

 

(9)

 

  

 

(0)

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

(5)

 

  

 

0

 

 

Accelerated Contingent Consideration

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

7

 

    

 

0

 

 

Acquisition Related Costs

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

12

 

  

 

8

 

  

 

14

 

 

Tax Settlements

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

(10)

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

Spanish Tax Settlement

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

Spanish Capital Tax Charge Reversal

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

(8)

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

Spanish Tax Charges

 

  

 

15

 

  

 

(4)

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

Integration Related Costs

 

         

 

3

 

 

Tax Assessment

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

3

 

 

FDA Mandated Product Recall

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

7

 

 

UK Pension Settlement Charges

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

2

 

 

CTA Realization

 

         

 

U.S. Tax Reform

 

  -

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

  

 

139

 

 

Legal Charges/Credits

  

 

-

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

31

 

  

 

1

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

Adjusted Net Income

      368          416    *     426          441          468    
  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

*Item does not foot due to rounding.

Adjusted Total Payout Ratio as Percentage of Adjusted Net Income

(IN MILLIONS U.S. $)

  

2013

  

2014

  

2015

  

2016

  

2017

 

Dividend Payment

 

  

 

87

 

  

 

133

 

  

 

159

 

  

 

185

 

  

 

206

 

Adjustment Due to Timing of Payment

 

  28

 

  -

 

  -

 

  -

 

  -

 

Adjusted Dividend Payment

 

  115

 

  133

 

  159

 

  185

 

  206

 

Share Repurchases

 

  51

 

  88

 

  122

 

  127

 

  58

 

Adjusted Total Payout as Percentage of Net Income

  166  221  281  312  264

 

Adjusted Net Income Payout

  

 

    45%    

  

 

    53%    

  

 

    66%    

  

 

    71%    

  

 

    56%    

IFF  |  2018 PROXY STATEMENT  93


LOGO

INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.

521 WEST 57TH STREET

NEW YORK, NY 10019

  

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the internet to transmit your voting instructions up until the date and time indicated on the reverse side. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. inIn mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive shareholder communications electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE -1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until the date and time indicated on the reverse side. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, by the date and time indicated on the reverse side.

VOTE IN PERSON

You may vote the shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:E03614-P76126           KEEP THIS PORTION  FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E37701-P03441                    KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.

   
 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all listed nominees, and FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3.

1.    

Elect eleven members of the Board of Directors for aone-year term expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Nominees:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain

1a.  

1b.

1c.

1d.

1e.

1f.

1g.

1h.

1i.

1j.

1k.

Marcello V. Bottoli

Dr. Linda Buck

Michael L. Ducker

David R. Epstein

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

John F. Ferraro

Andreas Fibig

Christina Gold

Katherine M. Hudson

Dale F. Morrison

Stephen Williamson

2.  

Ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 fiscal year.

     
  
1.   Election of Directors
    

3.

Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers in 2017.

   
Nominees:ForAgainstAbstainForAgainst
Abstain
1a.Marcello V. Bottoliooo2.To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.ooo
1b.Dr. Linda Buckooo    
   1c.Michael L. Duckerooo3.Advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers in 2015.ooo
1d.David R. Epsteinooo    
 1e.Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.ooo
1f.John F. Ferraroooo
1g.Andreas Fibigooo
1h.Christina Goldooo

NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 
   1i.Henry W. Howell, Jr.ooo
1j.Katherine M. Hudsonooo     
   1k.Dale F. Morrisonooo     
    
  

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

  o
     

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

oo

 

 

   
 YesNo 
 

Yes

No

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please add your title as such. When signing as joint tenants, all parties in the joint tenancy must sign. If signer is a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.

  
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date





ADMISSION TICKET
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MAY 2, 2016 AT 3:00 P.M. LOCAL TIME/9:00 A.M. EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.
61 RUE DE VILLIERS
NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FRANCE
ADMITS ONE SHAREHOLDER



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.
        E03615-P76126       

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]            

Date        

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date        


  
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.
THIS PROXY CARD/VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IS SOLICITED
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MAY 2, 2016
The undersigned hereby appoint(s) each of Mr. Andreas Fibig, Ms. Alison A. Cornell and Ms. Anne Chwat as the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the number of shares of stock the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. to be held at 61 rue de Villiers, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France on Monday, May 2, 2016 at 3:00 P.M. Local Time/9:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof (the “Meeting”).

IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD, THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, FOR ITEMS 2 AND 3 AND ACCORDING TO THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. VOTING INSTRUCTIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 11:59 P.M. EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME ON MAY 1, 2016.

If you are a participant in the International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Retirement Investment Fund Plans (the “401(k) Plans”), this proxy covers all shares for which the undersigned has the right to give voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, the trustee of the 401(k) Plans. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed by the undersigned on the reverse side. Shares in the 401(k) Plans for which voting instructions are not received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on April 28, 2016, or if no choice is specified, will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions are received from other participants in the applicable 401(k) Plan.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD/VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM PROMPTLY USING THE
ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.
 
  Address Changes/Comments:

ADMISSION TICKET

INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

MAY 2, 2018 AT 10:00 A.M. EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME

INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.

533 WEST 57th STREET, 9th FLOOR

NEW YORK, NY 10019

ADMITS ONE SHAREHOLDER

 
 
    

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

E37702-P03441        

INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.

THIS PROXY CARD/VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IS SOLICITED

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

MAY 2, 2018

The undersigned hereby appoint(s) each of Mr. Andreas Fibig and Ms. Anne Chwat as the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the number of shares of stock the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. to be held at the headquarters of the Company on Wednesday, May 2, 2018 at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof (the “Meeting”).

IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD, THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3 AND ACCORDING TO THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. VOTING INSTRUCTIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 11:59 P.M. EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME ON MAY 1, 2018.

If you are a participant in the International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Retirement Investment Fund Plans (the “401(k) Plans”), this proxy covers all shares for which the undersigned has the right to give voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, the trustee of the 401(k) Plans. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed by the undersigned on the reverse side. Shares in the 401(k) Plans for which voting instructions are not received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on April 27, 2018, or if no choice is specified, will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions are received from other participants in the applicable 401(k) Plan.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD/VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM PROMPTLY USING THE

ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.

 
  
Address Changes/Comments:
 
 
 (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

 
       
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE